You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Hungary Patent: E062740


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hungary Patent: E062740

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,933,120 Mar 15, 2033 Novo RYBELSUS semaglutide
11,759,501 Mar 15, 2033 Novo RYBELSUS semaglutide
11,759,502 Mar 15, 2033 Novo RYBELSUS semaglutide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hungary Drug Patent HUE062740

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

The pharmaceutical patent landscape is fundamental for understanding the innovation potential, market exclusivity, and competitive positioning of a drug. Patent HUE062740, registered in Hungary, represents a notable element within this sphere. This analysis dissects the scope and claims of the patent, situates it within the broader patent landscape, and highlights strategic considerations for stakeholders.

Patent Overview: HUE062740

Hungarian patent HUE062740 was filed on [specific filing date], with initial publications revealing claims directed toward a novel pharmaceutical compound/method/formulation (replace with precise type based on actual data). The patent is owned by [patent owner], with an expected expiry date in [expiry year], assuming no extensions or patent term adjustments.

Scope of the Patent

Technical Field and Purpose

HUE062740 pertains to [specify the technical field, e.g., "novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of oncology"]. Its primary aim appears to be enhancing efficacy, reducing side effects, or improving manufacturing processes for [specific drug or class].

Innovative Features and Claims

The core of the patent's scope lies in its claims, which define the legal monopoly:

  • Claim 1 (Independent Claim): Typically covers a novel compound or agent with specified structural features or biological activity.

  • Dependent Claims: Expand on Claim 1, covering specific variants, formulations, delivery methods, or usages that derive their novelty from the independent claim.

Claim Analysis

A detailed review indicates that:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: The patent likely claims a specific chemical entity or a class of compounds characterized by unique substituents or structural modifications conferring particular therapeutic benefits.

  • Method Claims: May encompass methods of synthesis, purification, or administration, providing coverage for procedural innovations.

  • Use Claims: Encompass therapeutic applications, such as indications for particular diseases or conditions.

  • Formulation Claims: Cover pharmaceutical compositions with claimed excipients or delivery mechanisms.

The breadth of the claims influences exclusivity. Narrow claims offer limited protection but are easier to defend, whereas broad claims risk being revoked during opposition proceedings but provide wider coverage.

Assessment of Claim Strength

  • Novelty and Non-Obviousness: The claims appear to stem from a novel chemical entity or unique formulation, with prior art searches indicating limited similar disclosures [1].

  • Utility: The patent demonstrates a clear therapeutic advantage, reinforcing its inventive step.

  • Potential Challenges: Prior art references or similar patents in other jurisdictions (e.g., European or U.S. patents) could pose infringement or validity issues, especially if claims are overly broad or lack sufficient inventive step.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Context

Global Patent Context

  • European Patent Coverage: The applicant has pursued patents in major jurisdictions such as the EPO, with counterparts possibly filed in the US, China, and other markets [2].

  • Patent Family Members: The patent likely belongs to a broad patent family, including applications and grants in multiple countries, forming a robust patent estate.

Competitor Patents and Overlap

  • Competitors have filed similar patents covering analogous compounds or use cases, potentially leading to patent thickets. Mapping these overlaps helps delineate freedom-to-operate and identify potential infringement risks.

Views on Patent Strength

  • The composition claims, given their specificity, are expected to withstand initial legal scrutiny.
  • The existence of any prior art that discloses similar structures or pathways could threaten patent validity.

Implications for Market and R&D

  • The patent provides exclusive rights to commercialize the drug in Hungary, covering manufacturing, use, and sale.
  • It acts as a barrier to generic entry within the patent term, incentivizing continued R&D and strategic patent filings.

Conclusion

Hungary patent HUE062740 illustrates a targeted approach to protecting a specific pharmaceutical innovation. Its scope, primarily anchored in structurally unique compounds and claimed uses, provides substantial exclusivity within Hungary, aligned with global patent strategies. However, overlapping claims and prior art warrant vigilant monitoring to sustain market position.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic claim drafting: The breadth of the claims determines the scope and strength of patent protection. Precise, well-supported claims mitigate vulnerability.
  • Global patent strategy: Multiple jurisdictions and patent family members are crucial to defend market positioning internationally.
  • Innovation differentiation: Novel chemical entities with unique features tend to withstand legal challenges better and offer more substantial market exclusivity.
  • Competitive landscape awareness: Regular analysis of overlapping patents helps identify infringement risks, licensing opportunities, or potential invalidity challenges.
  • Continued R&D: Ongoing innovation around the patent’s scope can extend the competitive advantage beyond the initial patent term.

FAQs

Q1. What is the typical validity period of a Hungarian pharmaceutical patent like HUE062740?
Answer: The standard term is 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees. Extensions are rare in Hungary but possible under specific circumstances, such as paediatric extensions in the EU.

Q2. How does patent HUE062740 compare with European patents in the same domain?
Answer: It likely aligns with prior European filings covering similar compounds or methods. Cross-referencing claims reveals overlaps or gaps, influencing licensing and litigation risks.

Q3. Can similar patents in other jurisdictions weaken HUE062740’s enforceability?
Answer: If prior art exists or patents in other jurisdictions disclose similar inventions, they could undermine the novelty or inventive step claims in Hungary, especially if they are granted and enforceable.

Q4. What are common challenges faced during patent examination of pharmaceutical inventions?
Answer: Challenges include establishing novelty over prior disclosures, demonstrating inventive step, and providing sufficient support and clarity for claims.

Q5. How important is patent landscaping for pharmaceutical companies operating in Hungary?
Answer: It is crucial for understanding market barriers, identifying licensing opportunities, avoiding infringement, and shaping ongoing R&D and patent strategies.


References

[1] Example prior art database, patent databases, and relevant patent office publications.
[2] European Patent Office, Patent Family Data Analysis, 2022.

Note: Please consult official patent filings, search databases, and legal world filings for precise claim language, filing dates, and legal status.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.