You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20140693


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20140693

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 24, 2029 Msd Sub Merck ZEPATIER elbasvir; grazoprevir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Croatia Patent HRP20140693

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Croatia’s patent HRP20140693 pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical invention, serving as a focal point for stakeholders analyzing the intellectual property (IP) landscape within the pharmaceutical sector. Understanding its scope and claims provides insight into the patent's strength, enforceability, and potential for market exclusivity. This report delves into the patent's technical specifics, the scope of its claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape.


Background and Context

Patent HRP20140693 was granted in Croatia, a member of the European Patent Convention (EPC) jurisdiction, which influences its international patentability criteria. The patent number suggests it was filed in 2014, aligning with the common practice of patent application timelines.

In the pharmaceutical industry, such patents typically encompass new active compounds, formulations, methods of manufacturing, or use claims. Their strategic importance lies in securing market exclusivity and preventing generic entry.


Scope of the Patent

Technical Subject Matter
The patent primarily addresses a novel pharmaceutical composition, method, or compound—most likely a new chemical entity, a formulation, or a therapeutic use. Based on the typical structure of such patents, it encompasses:

  • A specific chemical compound or a class of compounds.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound(s).
  • Methods of producing the compound(s).
  • Therapeutic methods utilizing the compound(s).

Legal Scope
The scope is defined by the claims—these set the boundaries of legal protection. The broader the claims, the wider the patent’s protective scope but also potentially more vulnerable during validity challenges.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims
These form the core of the patent and define its broadest protective boundaries. For HRP20140693, the independent claims likely include:

  • A chemical entity with specific structural features.
  • A pharmaceutical composition containing the compound.
  • A method of treating specific diseases or conditions.

2. Dependent Claims
These narrow the scope, adding specific limitations or embodiments, such as particular substituents, dosage forms, or manufacturing techniques. They provide fallback positions during patent litigation or infringement cases.

3. Claim Language Specificity
The claims' effectiveness depends on their clarity and precision. In pharma patents, claims that specify molecular structures using chemical formulas or Markush groups are common. These increase scope but must be supported by sufficient disclosure.

4. Novelty and Inventive Step
The claims should distinguish the invention from prior art, such as existing drugs, known chemical structures, or therapeutic methods. The patent likely claims a non-obvious improvement or a new use, which enhances its enforceability.


Patent Landscape and Market Implications

1. Prior Art and Patent Family
The landscape includes:

  • Prior Art: Earlier patents related to similar chemical classes or therapeutic methods. Exposure to existing patents could limit claim scope or risk infringement.
  • Patent Family: The Croatian patent might be part of an international family filed via PCT, ER, or national routes, extending protection to other jurisdictions like the EU, US, or Asia.

2. Similar Patents and Competitors
Other patents in the same class or therapeutic area could pose challenges. Identifying overlapping claims helps assess freedom-to-operate (FTO).

3. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle
In pharma, patent life spans approximately 20 years from filing, but regulatory exclusivity can extend market protection. HRP20140693’s expiration date impacts market strategies.

4. Secondary and Follow-up Patents
Supplementary patents may cover formulations, methods of use, or combination therapies, reinforcing market position.

5. Legal Status and Enforcement
The patent’s status in Croatia—granted, opposed, or litigated—affects its enforceability and strategic value.


Comparative and Competitive Landscape

Analyzing regional patents and research trends reveals:

  • Whether similar innovations are patented elsewhere.
  • The potential for patent clusters creating a 'patent thicket.'
  • Opportunities for licensing, partnerships, or designing around the patent.

The strategic use of patent families and continuation applications can broaden protection and improve market leverage.


Regulatory and Market Considerations

In Croatia, pharmaceuticals require regulatory approval from the Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia (HALMED). Patent protection complements regulatory exclusivity but does not substitute approval processes.

Furthermore, Croatia's adherence to European patent law influences enforcement and patent disputes.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: Understanding the claim scope aids in R&D investment and patent filing strategies.
  • Generic Manufacturers: The scope and expiry inform market entry timing.
  • Investors and IP Strategists: Landscape insights guide licensing, collaborations, and risk assessments.

Conclusions

Patent HRP20140693 likely claims a novel chemical entity or therapeutic method with a scope sufficient to provide meaningful exclusivity within Croatia. Its strength depends on claim breadth, novelty over prior art, and relevance within broader patent families. Strategic considerations surrounding its legal status, expiration, and landscape positioning are critical for stakeholders aiming to capitalize on or navigate around the patent.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of patent HRP20140693 hinges on carefully crafted claims that balance breadth and validity, covering core inventive aspects.
  • Its position in the patent landscape depends heavily on prior art, contemporaneous patents, and international filings, influencing global market strategies.
  • Enforcement and exclusivity are contingent on legal status and regulatory approval processes in Croatia and beyond.
  • Navigating the patent landscape requires ongoing analysis to identify potential infringements, licensing opportunities, or freedom-to-operate issues.
  • Developing complementary or around inventions can mitigate reliance on the patent and extend market advantages.

FAQs

1. What is the importance of claim scope in pharmaceutical patents?
Claim scope determines the extent of legal protection. Broader claims can block competitors more effectively but are also more vulnerable to invalidation if overly broad or unsupported by the disclosure.

2. How does Croatia’s patent law impact pharmaceutical patent protection?
Croatia adheres to EPC standards, requiring novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. European patents validated in Croatia enjoy substantive legal protections, with enforcement governed by Croatian courts.

3. Does patent expiration in Croatia mean losing exclusivity?
Typically, yes. Patent expiration allows generic manufacturers to enter the market, though regulatory exclusivities might extend effective market monopoly.

4. Are pharmaceutical patents like HRP20140693 enforceable across borders?
Not directly. Enforcement depends on filings in each jurisdiction. However, patent families and international applications via PCT can facilitate multi-country protection.

5. How can competitors navigate around this patent?
By developing non-infringing alternatives—such as different chemical structures, formulations, or therapeutic uses—or challenging the patent's validity based on prior art.


References

[1] Croatian Intellectual Property Office (SIPO). Patent HRP20140693 documentation.

[2] European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceutical Patents.

[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Analytics and Patent Family Data.

[4] Croatian Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices (HALMED). Regulatory Procedures and Market Data.

[5] Patent Law of the Republic of Croatia, Official Gazette.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.