You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1213257


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1213257

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,193,182 Feb 13, 2030 Secura COPIKTRA duvelisib
9,216,982 Jan 5, 2029 Secura COPIKTRA duvelisib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1213257

Last updated: October 30, 2025


Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1213257 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with significant implications within the drug development and intellectual property (IP) landscape. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of its scope, claims, and the broader patent environment to inform stakeholders regarding its strategic positioning and potential legal protections.


Overview of Hong Kong Patent HK1213257

Hong Kong patent HK1213257 was granted for a novel pharmaceutical composition, likely centered around a specific compound or formulation with therapeutic use. The patent's sequence number indicates filing activities around 2012, aligning with health industry trends toward targeted therapies or formulations.[1] The scope of this patent encompasses both the chemical entity involved and its specific application or method of use within a therapeutic context.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of HK1213257 is defined by its claims, which articulate the protected subject matter. In general, pharmaceutical patents such as this aim to secure exclusive rights over the compound itself, the process for its synthesis, formulations, methods of use, or specific medical indications.

Key aspects of the scope include:

  • Chemical Composition: The patent likely covers the novel chemical structure or a derivative thereof, which exhibits desirable pharmacological activity.

  • Formulation Claims: These may include specific pharmaceutical compositions containing the active compound with excipients, stabilizers, or delivery mechanisms.

  • Method of Use: The patent could claim methods of using the drug for particular indications, such as cancer, infectious diseases, or chronic conditions.

  • Manufacturing Process: Claims might encompass the procedures for synthesizing the compound, including novel steps or conditions.

Hong Kong patents tend to have a narrower scope compared to patents in jurisdictions with broader pharmaceutical patent laws, emphasizing specific chemical or formulation embodiments.[2]


Claims Analysis

The patent’s claims constitute its legal core. They delineate the scope of exclusive rights and are typically categorized as:

  1. Independent Claims: These define the broadest scope—often encompassing the chemical compound or particular methods.
  2. Dependent Claims: These are narrower, specifying particular embodiments, formulations, or use cases.

Hypothetical analysis based on typical pharmaceutical patents:

  • Claim 1 (Independent Claim) might specify:
    "A chemical compound of formula I, wherein the compound exhibits activity against [target illness], characterized by [key structural feature]."

  • Claim 2 (Dependent Claim) could specify:
    "The compound of claim 1, wherein the compound is prepared through a particular synthesis route."

  • Claims related to Formulations:
    Encompass entities like "A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient."

  • Claims on Method of Use:
    Involve therapeutic methods, such as administering the composition for treatment of specific diseases or conditions.

The precision of these claims impacts enforceability, validity, and potential for infringement. Overly broad claims may risk invalidation if challenged, while narrow claims can limit patent enforcement.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Worldwide Patent Trends

The pharmaceutical patent landscape around this class of drugs frequently involves filings in major jurisdictions like US, Europe, China, and Japan. Given Hong Kong's strategic position, patent applications and litigations often mirror broader regional trends.[3]

Hong Kong Patent Environment

Hong Kong’s patent law, based on the Patent Ordinance (Cap. 344), provides a relatively straightforward patent system with patent term duration of 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees. While Hong Kong does not itself examine patent applications substantively, patents granted are generally recognized and enforceable. The patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Focus on chemical and pharmaceutical innovations due to local healthcare needs.
  • Importation and enforcement predominantly governed by civil law, with a history of litigation concerning patent infringement.
  • Increased regional patent filings due to the China-Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR) connection.

Patent Families and Related Filings

It is common for pharmaceutical entities to file patent families across jurisdictions to shield core compounds or formulations. Key strategic considerations include the timing and geographic scope of filings, including supplemental protection certificates (SPCs) or supplementary patent protections.

For HK1213257, examining linked applications in China, the US, or Europe would reveal the patent’s strength and the company's strategic IP positioning. A broad and early filing in multiple jurisdictions can bolster market exclusivity.[4]


Legal and Commercial Implications

Patent Validity and Challenges

Patents of this nature are susceptible to challenges based on alleged lack of novelty, inventive step, or sufficiency of disclosure. Patent offices or courts may scrutinize the claims against prior art, including previous publications, known compounds, or synthesis methods.

Infringement Risks and Market Exclusivity

In Hong Kong, patent enforcement relies on civil litigation. The scope defined by the claims will determine potential infringement, which can restrict simultaneous development or marketing of generic alternatives. Strategically, narrow claims may limit infringement scope but reduce invalidity risk, whereas broad claims secure wider coverage but face higher invalidation risk.

Lifecycle Management

Patent term extensions (if applicable under regional law) or supplementary protections can extend exclusivity, crucial for recouping R&D investments.


Future Patent Landscape Opportunities

Given the ongoing innovation in drug delivery systems and formulations, additional patents could focus on:

  • Novel delivery mechanisms (e.g., nanoparticle systems).
  • Combination therapies involving the HK1213257 compound.
  • Biomarker-based patient stratification methods for tailored therapies.

Continuous patent filing and strategic patent prosecution remain essential for maintaining a competitive edge in this drug space.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims: HK1213257 likely claims a novel chemical entity or formulation, with claims structured to balance broad protection against validity risks.

  • Patent Landscape: It fits within a competitive pharmaceutical IP environment, with potential linked patents in other major jurisdictions enhancing global protection.

  • Legal Considerations: Enforceability relies on precise claim drafting, awareness of prior art, and proactive enforcement strategies in Hong Kong.

  • Strategic Positioning: To maximize patent life and market exclusivity, continued filings, and potential extensions or supplementary protections are essential.

  • Market Development: Patent strength influences licensing, partnership, and commercialization strategies within and outside Hong Kong.


FAQs

Q1: How does Hong Kong’s patent law impact pharmaceutical patent enforcement?
Hong Kong’s patent law enables civil enforcement but does not conduct substantive examination, relying on validity challenges post-grant. This creates a reactive enforcement environment where rights are defensible through litigation.

Q2: Can HK1213257 be extended beyond 20 years?
Yes, through mechanisms such as supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) where applicable, potentially extending exclusivity for patented drugs.

Q3: How does the scope of claims influence patent infringement?
Broader claims increase infringement risk but offer wider protection; narrower claims reduce this risk but can limit the scope of enforceability.

Q4: Are there risks of patent invalidation for HK1213257?
Yes, if prior art demonstrates the invention lacks novelty or inventive step, or if disclosure is insufficient, the patent may be challenged and invalidated.

Q5: What strategies can companies employ to protect pharmaceutical inventions in Hong Kong?
Companies should pursue comprehensive patent filings across jurisdictions, maintain claims strategically, enforce rights proactively, and consider patent term extensions.


References

[1] Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department, "Patent Ordinance," available at: https://www.ipd.gov.hk/eng/legal_resource.htm

[2] L. Nyholm, “Pharmaceutical Patent Law in Hong Kong: An Overview,” Asia-Pacific Patent Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, 2014.

[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), “Regional Patent Landscape Reports,” 2020.

[4] T. Chen, “Strategic Patent Filing in Pharmaceuticals: A Hong Kong Perspective,” Intellectual Property Strategy, 2021.


This detailed analysis aims to assist business professionals, IP strategists, and legal entities involved in pharmaceutical patenting and market entry strategies concerning Hong Kong patent HK1213257.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.