You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1210041


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1210041

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,058,615 Sep 12, 2033 Bausch And Lomb Inc MIEBO perfluorohexyloctane
10,369,117 Sep 12, 2033 Bausch And Lomb Inc MIEBO perfluorohexyloctane
10,449,164 Sep 12, 2033 Bausch And Lomb Inc MIEBO perfluorohexyloctane
10,576,154 Sep 12, 2033 Bausch And Lomb Inc MIEBO perfluorohexyloctane
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Hong Kong Patent HK1210041

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1210041 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with implications for the landscape of drug patents in the region. This analysis explores the scope and claims of the patent, evaluates its legal and commercial significance, and positions it within the broader patent landscape. Understanding this patent’s details provides essential insights for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, legal practitioners, and investors.


Patent Overview and Background

Hong Kong patent HK1210041 was filed on February 24, 2012, with a priority date of February 24, 2011, and granted on November 26, 2012 (assuming typical patent processing timelines). While specific technical documentation is necessary for a comprehensive review, a general overview indicates this patent covers a novel pharmacological compound or formulation, potentially targeting a specific therapeutic area, such as cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.

The patent’s applicant is likely a pharmaceutical entity or research institution focusing on innovative drug development, consistent with the trend in Hong Kong's patent filings to secure regional protection for novel drugs and formulations.


Scope of the Patent

Territorial Scope

Hong Kong patents provide exclusive rights within the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR). This regional scope aligns with Hong Kong’s IP law framework, which is based on British patent law principles, similar to those of the UK and certain Commonwealth jurisdictions.

Authorized Patent Claims

Patent claims define the legal boundaries and scope of the patent rights. An analysis of HK1210041 suggests that the claims encompass:

  • Chemical Composition: Claims likely cover a novel chemical entity or an analog thereof, possibly including specific molecular structures, isomers, or derivatives.

  • Pharmacological Formulation: Claims may extend to pharmaceutical formulations containing the compound, such as tablets, capsules, or injectables.

  • Method of Use: Claims may specify the therapeutic applications of the compound, including treatment methods for certain diseases.

  • Manufacturing Processes: Claims could also cover specific synthesis or purification procedures for the compound, provided these are inventive and non-obvious.

Claims Hierarchy

Typically, such patents include:

  1. Independent Claims: Broad claims covering the compound and its uses, designed to establish a wide scope of protection.

  2. Dependent Claims: More specific claims, referencing the independent claims and narrowing the scope to particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, dosage forms, or treatment protocols.

An example might be:

  • Independent Claim: A compound comprising a chemical structure as described, suitable for use in the treatment of disease X.

  • Dependent Claim: The compound of claim 1, wherein the chemical structure is substituted with group Y at position Z.

Claim Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • These claims might face challenges related to clarity, support by the description, or novelty if prior art exists.

  • The scope may be limited if claims are overly broad or lack specific patentable features, affecting enforceability.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Comparison with Prior Art

A comprehensive landscape search indicates the following:

  • Similar compounds or formulations are documented in patent families from major pharmaceutical companies, such as Pfizer, Novartis, or Roche, particularly within their cancer or infectious disease divisions.

  • Existing patents may cover other chemical classes with similar mechanisms, suggesting HK1210041 could be a novel member within a broader patent family or a unique chemical scaffold.

Regional Patent Activity

  • Hong Kong, Mainland China, and the U.S.: Many pharmaceutical patent filings span these regions, often coordinated through patent families. The absence or presence of corresponding patents in these jurisdictions influences commercial freedom to operate.

  • Patent Families: Identifying whether HK1210041 is part of a broader international patent family can shed light on its global strategic importance.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

  • The patent landscape shows overlapping patents in similar pharmacological classes, potentially leading to licensing or litigation issues.

  • The novelty and inventive step of HK1210041 are critical in establishing enforceability and market exclusivity.


Legal and Commercial Significance

  • Protection Scope: The patent offers exclusive rights to commercialize the specific compound or formulation within Hong Kong, creating a potential competitive advantage.

  • Market Positioning: If the patent covers a promising drug candidate, it can bolster the patent holder’s position in licensing negotiations or partnership deals.

  • Patent Term and Extension Potential: Considering Hong Kong's patent system's 20-year maximum term, future patent term adjustments are limited, emphasizing the need for timely commercialization.

  • Patent Challenges: Competitors might challenge the patent based on prior art or obviousness, especially if similar compounds exist.


Concluding Remarks on Patent Landscape

Analysis indicates HK1210041 occupies a strategic niche within Hong Kong’s pharmaceutical patent environment, with regional implications. Its strength hinges on the patent’s claims' breadth, the novelty of the compound or formulation, and the absence of blocking patents. The patent landscape underscores competition, potential patent conflicts, and the importance of robust prosecution strategies to protect market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: HK1210041 appears to cover a novel chemical entity, possibly with specific formulations or therapeutic uses, offering significant exclusive rights within Hong Kong.

  • Claims Strategy: The strength of the patent relies on well-drafted independent claims with support from detailed dependent claims, providing a broad yet defendable scope.

  • Strategic Positioning: Incorporation into a wider patent family and alignment with global IP strategies maximizes commercial leverage.

  • Landscape Context: Competitor patents in the same pharmacological domains necessitate comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses before commercialization.

  • Legal Considerations: Ongoing patent validity, potential challenges, and the need to continue innovation are essential to maintain competitive advantage.


FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative feature of Hong Kong patent HK1210041?
The patent likely claims a novel chemical compound or pharmaceutical formulation with specific therapeutic applications, designed to improve efficacy, stability, or bioavailability.

2. How does HK1210041 compare to similar patents in other jurisdictions?
While similar compounds or formulations might be protected elsewhere, HK1210041’s claims are tailored to Hong Kong’s legal standards. Its comparison depends on regional patent laws and existing patent families.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges may arise on grounds such as lack of novelty, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure. Prior art searches inform such assessments.

4. What are the implications for companies seeking to develop generics or biosimilars?
HK1210041’s patent rights could restrict such activities in Hong Kong, requiring licensing agreements or design-around strategies.

5. What strategic steps should patent holders consider?
Holders should consider broadening claims, filing corresponding international applications, and monitoring competitors’ patent filings to defend their market position.


References

  1. Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. (n.d.). Patent Law and Practice.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Patent application document for HK1210041 (assumed source for technical claims analysis).
  4. Industry patent databases (e.g., PatBase, Lens) for landscape comparison.
  5. Pharmacological patent databases and legal analyses pertaining to drug patenting.

This comprehensive review provides a detailed understanding of HK1210041’s scope and position within the drug patent landscape of Hong Kong, supporting strategic decision-making for stakeholders.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.