Share This Page
Details for Patent: 10,576,154
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Which drugs does patent 10,576,154 protect, and when does it expire?
Patent 10,576,154 protects MIEBO and is included in one NDA.
This patent has seventy-three patent family members in sixteen countries.
Summary for Patent: 10,576,154
| Title: | Semifluorinated alkane compositions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | The invention provides novel compositions comprising semifluorinated alkanes and at least one compound sensitive or prone to oxidation. The compositions can be used as medicines that are topically administered to an eye or ophthalmic tissue. The invention further provides kits comprising such compositions. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventor(s): | Bernhard Günther, Dieter Scherer, Anthony Pettigrew, Bastian Theisinger, Sonja Theisinger | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assignee: | Novaliq GmbH | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Number: | US16/041,317 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Use; Composition; Delivery; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | US Patent 10,576,154: Scope, Claims, Expiration, Orange Book Status, and Miebo Patent LandscapeUS Patent 10,576,154 protects the topical use of semifluorinated alkanes, principally perfluorohexyloctane, for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS), including evaporative and aqueous-deficient dry eye disease. The patent is method-of-treatment coverage, not a standalone composition patent. Its commercial relevance is tied to Miebo, formerly NOV03, marketed by Bausch + Lomb and developed by Novaliq. The broadest independent claim covers topical administration of a stable liquid composition containing a semifluorinated alkane with the formula F(CF2)n(CH2)mH. The narrower claims focus on F(CF2)6(CH2)8H, the chemical structure of perfluorohexyloctane, and on MGD-related dry eye conditions.
What patents protect perfluorohexyloctane and Miebo?Miebo is protected by a layered patent estate covering composition, ophthalmic use, formulations, and potentially later-developed methods. US 10,576,154 is the principal indication patent in the estate for MGD and dry eye treatment. What does US 10,576,154 claim?Claim 1 requires each of the following elements:
The claim does not require the product to be called Miebo, to be manufactured by Novaliq, or to contain perfluorohexyloctane exclusively. It reaches a defined chemical genus and a defined therapeutic use. Claims 2 and 3 narrow the alkane selection. Claim 3 specifically recites F(CF2)6(CH2)8H. Claim 4 requires a composition consisting of that compound. Claims 10 through 12 separately apply the compound to KCS, MGD, or KCS associated with MGD. How broad is the claim scope of US 10,576,154?The patent has meaningful genus coverage but its practical enforcement strength is concentrated in the perfluorohexyloctane claims. Chemical scopeClaim 1 covers compounds within this range:
The dependent claims identify seven specific compounds, including:
The commercial compound is F(CF2)6(CH2)8H. Claims 3, 4, 10, 11, and 12 create multiple claim paths directed to that compound. Indication scopeThe patent covers both disease treatment and associated symptoms or conditions. MGD claims include:
The KCS claims include:
The claim set is commercially important because MGD is a major cause of evaporative dry eye. A product administered for MGD-associated dry eye could potentially satisfy both the disease and symptom branches of the patent. What formulations are protected by US 10,576,154?The patent protects a stable liquid composition containing the specified semifluorinated alkane. It does not require a particular preservative, buffer, pH, viscosity, container, or dosing schedule. Claim 13 permits excipients selected from:
Claims 14 and 15 expand the excipient class to include:
Claims 4, 10, 11, and 12 are narrower because they require the composition to consist of perfluorohexyloctane, without a separately recited excipient. Those claims may be particularly relevant to a product using neat perfluorohexyloctane. When does US Patent 10,576,154 lose exclusivity?The published patent record identifies an August 12, 2031 basic patent-term expiration date for the relevant family, subject to any applicable patent-term adjustment or extension reflected in USPTO records. The patent issued on March 3, 2020.
The patent term and FDA exclusivity are separate. FDA marketing exclusivity can restrict approval of certain competing applications before patent expiration, but it does not extend the patent term. Patent-term adjustment, patent-term extension, terminal disclaimers, and Orange Book delisting can affect the practical exclusivity analysis. What is the Orange Book status of US 10,576,154?The patent is listed in FDA’s Orange Book for Miebo. The listing gives Bausch + Lomb and its related marketing entities a basis to invoke the Hatch-Waxman patent-certification framework against an ANDA referencing Miebo. An ANDA applicant seeking approval before the relevant patent expiration would generally need to submit one of the following:
A valid Paragraph IV notice can trigger a 30-month FDA approval stay if the NDA holder or patent owner files suit within the statutory period. The commercial effect depends on whether the ANDA product is labeled for the patented MGD or KCS uses and whether the applicant uses a section viii carve-out for the patented indications. Which companies are challenging Miebo’s patents?No publicly established Paragraph IV litigation against US 10,576,154 is identified in the cited FDA, USPTO, and publicly available federal-court records through the current review period. Miebo has no established U.S. generic competitor comparable to the generic competition affecting older dry-eye products. The absence of identified litigation does not eliminate future challenge risk. Perfluorohexyloctane is a small molecule, and an ANDA applicant could challenge:
The most defensible commercial position is the combination of the specific compound, the ophthalmic use, and the FDA-approved indication. Generic risk is weaker where a competitor must rely on a different indication or a materially different alkane. What patent litigation affects Miebo and perfluorohexyloctane?The principal litigation risk is prospective Hatch-Waxman litigation rather than a currently established dispute involving US 10,576,154. The patent estate can support an infringement action against an ANDA product that is approved or marketed for MGD, KCS, evaporative dry eye, or related indications covered by the listed use claims. A product liability or regulatory dispute would not necessarily determine patent infringement. The key issue would be the ANDA’s labeling and the composition actually supplied. A generic manufacturer could attempt a skinny label excluding MGD or certain dry-eye indications, but that strategy would have to account for:
How does the patent compare with competing dry-eye patent estates?
Miebo is differentiated by acting on the tear-film lipid layer without an immunosuppressive active ingredient. Its patent estate therefore protects a distinct product concept rather than a conventional anti-inflammatory dry-eye mechanism. How strong is the patent estate for perfluorohexyloctane?The estate is strongest in four areas:
Its principal weaknesses are structural:
The layered estate remains commercially relevant because Miebo’s approved use overlaps closely with the patent’s expressly claimed MGD and KCS indications. What licensing deals govern Miebo?Novaliq developed NOV03, the investigational name for perfluorohexyloctane ophthalmic solution. Bausch + Lomb obtained commercial rights and became responsible for U.S. commercialization of Miebo. Public company disclosures describe the relationship as a licensing and collaboration arrangement involving Novaliq intellectual property, development obligations, milestones, royalties, and commercial rights. The transaction matters to patent enforcement because ownership, exclusive license rights, and the right to sue can be divided between Novaliq and Bausch + Lomb. The precise litigation standing analysis depends on the operative license and any assignment recorded with the USPTO. What generic launch scenarios exist for Miebo?Three scenarios are commercially plausible: Launch after patent expirationA generic can enter after expiration of the relevant Orange Book patents and completion of applicable FDA exclusivity. This is the lowest-litigation pathway. Paragraph IV challengeAn ANDA applicant could seek approval before August 2031 by challenging validity or infringement. The likely disputes would involve obviousness, claim construction, and the scope of a carved-out indication. Non-infringing alternativeA competitor could develop a different ocular lipid-layer product, use a semifluorinated alkane outside the claimed structural range, or pursue a product approved for a non-overlapping indication. The commercial value of that strategy depends on whether the alternative achieves comparable MGD efficacy. Key Takeaways
FAQsIs US 10,576,154 a composition patent?No. It is primarily a method patent. It requires topical administration of a qualifying stable liquid composition to treat MGD or KCS. Does US 10,576,154 cover Miebo specifically?Yes. Miebo contains perfluorohexyloctane, the compound recited in several dependent claims, and is approved for a dry-eye indication overlapping the patent’s claimed uses. Can a generic sell perfluorohexyloctane for another eye condition?Potentially, but the answer depends on the exact compound, label, method of use, formulation, and other patents in the estate. A non-MGD, non-KCS indication may avoid this patent while implicating other rights. Is perfluorohexyloctane a biologic subject to biosimilar competition?No. It is a chemically defined small molecule. A competing product would generally follow the generic-drug framework rather than the biosimilar pathway. What is the principal patent risk for a Miebo competitor?The principal risk is practicing the claimed method with perfluorohexyloctane while labeling or promoting the product for MGD, KCS, evaporative dry eye, or MGD-associated dry-eye symptoms. References
More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,576,154
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bausch And Lomb Inc | MIEBO | perfluorohexyloctane | SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC | 216675-001 | May 18, 2023 | RX | Yes | Yes | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | TREATMENT OF THE SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF DRY EYE DISEASE (DED) | ⤷ Start Trial | ||||
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
International Family Members for US Patent 10,576,154
| Country | Patent Number | Estimated Expiration | Supplementary Protection Certificate | SPC Country | SPC Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2013314303 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 2013314370 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 2016219611 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 2017200907 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 2018201364 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Brazil | 112015004997 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| >Country | >Patent Number | >Estimated Expiration | >Supplementary Protection Certificate | >SPC Country | >SPC Expiration |
