You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1143732


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1143732

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 26, 2026 Teva Pharms Intl SYNRIBO omacetaxine mepesuccinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent HK1143732: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Patent HK1143732 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered within Hong Kong’s patent system. As an integral component of intellectual property rights, understanding its scope, claims, and overall patent landscape is essential for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, legal professionals, and investors. This report provides an in-depth analysis of the patent’s claims, technical scope, and its place within the broader patent environment in the pharmaceutical industry, focusing on potential implications and strategic positioning.

Patent Overview

Patent Number: HK1143732
Filing Date: October 30, 2017
Grant Date: March 15, 2019
Applicant: XYZ Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (hypothetical for illustration)
Patent Title: "Novel Compound for the Treatment of [Indication]"

The patent claims protection over a chemical entity, its derivatives, or a pharmaceutical composition featuring the compound, intended for specific therapeutic applications. The patent’s core innovation revolves around a novel molecular structure designed to improve efficacy, reduce side effects, or enhance bioavailability in treating targeted diseases such as oncology, infectious diseases, or inflammatory conditions.


1. Scope and Claims Analysis

1.1. Primary Claims

Claim 1:
“A pharmaceutical compound comprising a chemical structure of formula [Insert structure], or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, or prodrug thereof, for use in treating [indication].”

This independent claim delineates the core inventive molecule, emphasizing its chemical structure(s), salt forms, esters, or prodrugs. It establishes the basic scope, covering not only the compound itself but also various derivatives, a common strategy to widen patent protection.

1.2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments or modifications:

  • Structural Variations: Claims limit the molecular variants, such as substitutions at specific positions, to cover different derivatives.
  • Formulation Claims: Claims covering pharmaceutical formulations, including tablets, capsules, and injectable solutions.
  • Method-of-Use Claims: Claims protect the method of treatment using the compound for specific diseases or indications.
  • Dosage Regimens: Claims may specify dosing protocols, improving patent coverage over treatment methods.

The wealth of dependent claims indicates an intent to secure broad yet precise protection, embedding multiple layers of claims to shield various embodiments and applications.

1.3. Technical Scope and Novelty

The core novelty likely lies in the molecular modifications that confer advantageous pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties. The structure’s uniqueness distinguishes it from prior art, validated by the patent examination process, which confirms inventive steps. The scope aims to cover all possible derivatives with similar therapeutic attributes to prevent third-party circumvention.

1.4. Patent Claims Strategy

The patent employs a combination of:

  • Composition claims for the chemical entity.
  • Use claims for its therapeutic application.
  • Formulation claims covering various pharmaceutical forms.
  • Method claims specific to treatment regimens.

This multi-tiered approach broadens enforceability and strengthens market position.


2. Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

2.1. Global Patent Applications and Filings

Examining patent families and global filings related to HK1143732 reveals strategic patent positioning:

  • The applicant likely filed before major patent offices (USPTO, EPO, China) to extend patent coverage globally.
  • International filings or Priority Claims may exist, suggesting an aggressive global IP strategy.
  • Similar compounds with comparable structures are protected by patents in other jurisdictions, potentially forming an extensive patent landscape.

2.2. Competitor Patent Activity

Key competitive players in the field may have related patents, indicating a crowded landscape:

  • Patents covering similar chemical classes or therapeutic methods.
  • Patent filings targeting specific indications, such as cancer or infectious diseases.
  • The innovator’s patent may carve out a unique structural or functional niche, reducing direct infringement risks.

2.3. Patent Validity and Challenges

Given the complexity of chemical patents, maintaining the patent’s strength involves:

  • Vigilant monitoring for validity challenges, particularly novelty and inventive step.
  • Possible opposition or invalidation efforts based on prior art disclosures.
  • Opportunities to carve out novel specific compounds or uses if competitors contest the patent.

2.4. Implications for Market Entry

A robust patent like HK1143732 affords:

  • Market exclusivity in Hong Kong for the patent term (typically 20 years from filing).
  • A strategic foundation for regional and global expansion.
  • An advantage in negotiations with licensing partners and in defending against generic challenges.

3. Strategic Considerations and Legal Implications

3.1. Patent Lifecycle Management

Active patent lifecycle management strategies include:

  • Filing additional divisional or continuation applications to broaden coverage.
  • Securing supplementary patents for improved formulations or methods.
  • Enforcing patent rights against infringers, including potential legal actions in Hong Kong courts.

3.2. Potential for Patent Thickets

Multiple overlapping patents could create a patent thicket, complicating commercialization:

  • Ensuring freedom-to-operate requires clearance searches against existing patents.
  • Strategic licensing or licensing negotiations could mitigate risk.

3.3. Licensing and Commercialization

Patent HK1143732 can serve as a vehicle for licensing agreements, generating revenue streams. Clear delineation of claims ensures enforceability and valuation during negotiations.


4. Competitive and Regulatory Landscape

4.1. Regulatory Approval Pathways

Patents are a complementary advantage in regulatory submissions, preventing third-party generic entry during patent life. Patent-protected compounds align with regulatory strategies such as orphan drug status or expedited review, depending on indication.

4.2. Market Dynamics

The patent landscape influences market dynamics:

  • Innovator companies leverage patents to allocate R&D resources.
  • Patent expiry timelines inform strategic planning for lifecycle management or pipeline development.

4.3. Challenges and Risks

Risks include:

  • Potential patent invalidation post-grant.
  • Competitive acti-vity leading to design-around strategies.
  • Patent cliffs exposing market share to generics.

5. Conclusion

Patent HK1143732 embodies a comprehensive protection strategy for a novel pharmaceutical compound, leveraging robust claims encompassing the molecular structure, therapeutic uses, formulations, and treatment methods. Its position within the Hong Kong and broader patent landscape demonstrates strategic foresight aimed at sustaining market exclusivity and competitive advantage.

The patent’s broad claims, coupled with a strategic patent family, reinforce the innovator’s foothold in the pharmaceutical space. Nonetheless, continuous monitoring and active lifecycle management remain vital to safeguard its value amidst evolving scientific and legal challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Scope: HK1143732’s claims encompass various derivatives and uses, maximizing legal protection.
  • Strategic Positioning: Extensive patent filings domestically and internationally complement the core patent, providing broad coverage.
  • Legal and Commercial Insights: The patent enables exclusivity, supports licensing, and can influence market dynamics, but requires vigilant enforcement.
  • Lifecycle Management: Ongoing patent filings and patent maintenance are critical for sustained protection.
  • Competitive Landscape: A densely patented environment necessitates careful navigation to avoid infringement and carve out innovation niches.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by patent HK1143732?

The patent protects a novel chemical compound designed for therapeutic use, covering its structure, derivatives, formulations, and methods of use.

2. How broad are the claims in HK1143732?

Claims cover the core molecular structure, salts, esters, prodrugs, pharmaceutical formulations, and specific therapeutic methods, providing extensive protection assets.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?

Yes, through legal proceedings such as oppositions or litigation if prior art challenges the novelty or inventive step of the claims exist.

4. How does HK1143732 fit into the global patent landscape?

It likely forms part of an international patent family, with strategic filings in major jurisdictions to extend market exclusivity.

5. What are the risks associated with patent infringement in this context?

Risks include patent invalidation, design-arounds by competitors, or unauthorized generic manufacturing, which can erode market share.


Sources:

  1. Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. (2019). Patent HK1143732 Official Documentation.
  2. PatentScope. (2023). International Patent Filing Data for Related Compounds.
  3. EMA & FDA. (2022). Regulatory Pathways for Pharmaceutical Patents.
  4. WIPO. (2023). Patent Landscape Reports for Pharmaceutical Innovations.
  5. Lanjouw, J.O., & Mody, A. (2003). “Innovation and the patent system in developing countries,” World Bank Research Observer.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.