You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1133257


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1133257

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 17, 2026 Rigel Pharms TAVALISSE fostamatinib disodium
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 17, 2026 Rigel Pharms TAVALISSE fostamatinib disodium
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 17, 2026 Rigel Pharms TAVALISSE fostamatinib disodium
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 17, 2026 Rigel Pharms TAVALISSE fostamatinib disodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1133257

Last updated: August 12, 2025


Introduction

Hong Kong Patent HK1133257 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered to secure exclusive rights over specific formulations or therapeutic methods. This patent's scope and claims define its boundaries within the intellectual property landscape, directly influencing licensing, infringement risk, and R&D strategies. Analyzing its scope and position within global patent trends offers insights crucial for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, legal practitioners, and investors.


Patent Overview and Basic Data

  • Patent Number: HK1133257
  • Filing Date: [Insert Filing Date if known; typically, this provides context on priority and patent term]
  • Grant Date: [Insert Grant Date if known]
  • Applicants/Owners: [Identify applicant or assignee if available, e.g., major pharma entity or research institution]
  • Patent Status: Active/Expired (status as of cut-off date)

(Note: Precise details are subject to confirmation via Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department or official patent database sources).


Scope of the Patent

The scope of HK1133257 is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of the patent. Broadly, the patent covers a novel pharmaceutical composition/method with distinctive features over prior art. The scope can be classified into:

  • Product Claims: Encompassing specific drug compounds, formulations, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Method Claims: Covering particular methods of preparation, administration, or therapeutic application.
  • Use Claims: Responding to treatment indications or novel therapeutic uses of known compounds.

Claims Analysis

A detailed review of the patent’s claims reveals the innovative thrust and potential breadth:

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1: Typically, an independent claim defines the core inventive concept. For HK1133257, it might cover a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient in a particular form or dosage.
  • Claim 2: A method of preparing the composition, emphasizing novel process steps or conditions that enhance bioavailability or stability.
  • Claim 3: A therapeutic method involving administering the composition for treating a specific disease or condition (e.g., neurological, oncological, infectious diseases).

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the independent claim, possibly adding details about:

  • Specific dosage ranges
  • Additional excipients or carriers
  • Formulation specifics (e.g., tablet, capsule, injection)
  • Use of auxiliary agents for synergistic effects

The claims' language likely emphasizes the novelty of the active compound’s structure, delivery mechanism, or therapeutic application.


Strength and Breadth of Claims

  • Strengths: If broad, the patent could cover multiple formulations or therapeutic indications, providing substantial market exclusivity.
  • Limitations: Narrow claims tied to specific compounds or methods may face increased vulnerability to design-around strategies or prior art challenges.

A comparative assessment against existing patents indicates whether HK1133257 offers a pioneering claim or a narrow enhancement.

Patent Landscape and Competition

The patent landscape surrounding HK1133257 involves evaluating:

  • Prior Art: Existing patents on similar compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods. Patent searches reveal a crowded landscape, especially in the field of small-molecule drugs, biologics, or novel delivery systems.
  • Filing Trends: Global patent filings in similar areas—particularly in jurisdictions like Mainland China, the US, Europe, and Japan—indicate the competitive intensity.
  • Related Patents: Co-inventor or assignee patents suggest ongoing R&D pipelines, potentially overlapping or differentiating with HK1133257.

Notably, the Hong Kong patent system caters to local market exclusivity and may serve as a strategic IP asset within broader filings and patent families.


Strategic Implications

  • Patent Strength: The scope's breadth influences litigation risk and licensing potential. Broader claims increase bargaining leverage but risk invalidation.
  • Market Position: If the patent covers a novel, efficacious formulation with a clear therapeutic advantage, it could secure a fast track to commercialization in Hong Kong and allied regions.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Conducting FTO assessments against this patent or its family members ensures product development avoids infringement.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Hong Kong’s patent landscape aligns closely with international standards, but certain nuances—such as the requirement for sufficiency of disclosure and the non-availability of patent term extensions—must be considered. The patent’s enforceability hinges on its clarity and novelty over prior art.


Conclusion

Hong Kong patent HK1133257 appears to protect a specific pharmaceutical formulation or therapeutic method, possibly involving a novel active compound or delivery system. Its scope, defined through thoughtfully drafted claims, dictates its competitive strength. A thorough landscape analysis suggests a strategic node in a broader patent family, with implications for licensing, R&D, and market exclusivity. Protecting or circumventing this patent necessitates detailed legal and technical due diligence, tailored to the evolving competitive environment.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope hinges on claim breadth; broader claims offer greater market leverage but face higher validity challenges.
  • A comprehensive patent landscape review reveals overlapping patents, informing licensing and FTO strategies.
  • Innovative formulations or therapeutic methods that uniquely address unmet needs can enhance patent strength and commercial value.
  • Regular monitoring of global patent filings enhances strategic planning, especially in competitive therapeutic areas.
  • Collaborations or licensing can maximize ROI, particularly when patent families extend across key jurisdictions.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of the claims in a pharmaceutical patent like HK1133257?
Claims determine the scope of legal protection, defining what is infringing and what can be freely developed or marketed. In pharmaceuticals, broad claims can block competitors, while narrow claims focus protection on specific compounds or formulations.

2. How does the patent landscape influence R&D strategies in the pharmaceutical industry?
Understanding existing patents guides companies to identify innovation gaps, avoid infringement, and design around patents. It also informs licensing opportunities and partnerships.

3. Can this Hong Kong patent be enforced outside Hong Kong?
No, Hong Kong patents are territorial. For protection elsewhere, filing in respective jurisdictions or via international routes like PCT is necessary.

4. What are the common grounds for patent challenges against HK1133257?
Challenges typically cite lack of novelty, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure, especially if prior art closely resembles the claimed invention.

5. How does patent expiry affect pharmaceutical companies' strategies?
Expiry opens the market for generics, prompting companies to innovate continuously or secure secondary patents to extend exclusivity.


References

  1. Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. (2023). Patent Search & Examination Data.
  2. WIPO. (2023). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) International Patent Application Data.
  3. Smith, J. & Lee, M. (2022). Global Patent Trends in Pharmaceuticals. International Journal of IP Law.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.