You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1126477


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1126477

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,217,057 Nov 6, 2029 Pf Prism Cv XALKORI crizotinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1126477

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

Hong Kong Patent HK1126477 pertains to a specific innovation in the pharmaceutical domain. While Hong Kong's patent system is largely harmonized with international standards, including the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), it maintains unique procedural and substantive nuances. This analysis dissects the scope, claims, and underlying patent landscape, offering a comprehensive understanding for stakeholders, including patent strategists, industry players, and legal professionals.


Overview of HK1126477

HK1126477 was granted for an invention formulated within the pharmaceutical or biotechnological field. As with most patents granted in Hong Kong, the patent document delineates an invention intended to meet the criteria of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

The patent's core relates to a novel compound, a unique formulation, or a manufacturing process—each with potential implications for therapy, manufacturing efficiency, or drug delivery.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of Hong Kong Patent HK1126477 defines the boundaries of legal protection conferred by the patent. It encompasses the inventive features detailed in the claims, which set the precise conditions under which infringement occurs.

The scope includes:

  • Chemical Composition or Compound: Likely a specific molecular entity, such as an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) with defined structural features.
  • Method of Synthesis or Manufacturing: Possible processes for producing the compound with improved yield, purity, or cost-effectiveness.
  • Pharmaceutical Formulation or Delivery System: Innovations involving dosage forms, carriers, or controlled-release mechanisms.
  • Use or Application Claims: The intended therapeutic use for certain indications, such as cancer, infectious diseases, or chronic conditions.

The scope’s breadth or narrowness hinges on the language employed in the claims. Broad claims may cover various derivatives or uses, while narrow claims focus on specific compounds or methods, influencing enforcement and licensing strategies.


Analysis of the Patent Claims

1. Types of Claims

The patent likely comprises multiple claim types, including:

  • Independent Claims: Broader claims defining the essential features of the invention.
  • Dependent Claims: Specific embodiments or embodiments that further narrow or specify features.

2. Key Claim Elements

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents, key claim elements may include:

  • Structural Formula: If the patent covers a chemical compound, the claim probably specifies a molecular structure, possibly with substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Methodology: Synthesis steps, purification techniques, or formulation processes.
  • Therapeutic Use: Claims focusing on treating particular diseases using the compound or formulation.
  • Dosage and Delivery: Claims covering dosage amounts, frequency, or delivery systems.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The core of the claims rests on the unique features that distinguish the invention from prior art:

  • Novel Structural Features: The compound may have an unprecedented chemical modification enhancing efficacy or reducing toxicity.
  • Improved Pharmacokinetics: Formulations that optimize absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion.
  • Manufacturing Advantages: A streamlined or more cost-effective synthesis process.
  • Enhanced Therapeutic Effect: Demonstrating unexpected benefits over existing treatments.

4. Claim Interpretation and Scope

Hong Kong law emphasizes a "purposive" interpretation aligned with the European approach. As such, claims are construed in light of the invention's technical contribution and the description, affecting the scope's flexibility and enforceability.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

1. Patent Family and Related Applications

HK1126477 may be part of a broader patent family protecting similar innovations across jurisdictions like China, Europe, or the U.S. For example, associated PCT applications or national filings could provide insight into the patent's scope and strategic positioning.

2. Existing Patents and Literature

The patent landscape in this area is dense, with numerous patents covering:

  • Similar chemical scaffolds
  • Analogues or derivatives
  • Formulation technologies
  • Specific therapeutic uses

Infringement risks or freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses must consider patents from major pharmaceutical players, universities, or biotech firms that have filed in Hong Kong or related jurisdictions.

3. Legal and Technical Challenges

Given the sophisticated nature of pharmaceutical patents, prior art searches reveal that:

  • Many compounds are based on common core structures, with claims often challenged for lack of inventive step.
  • Patent examiners scrutinize the inventive step, especially if the modifications are considered routine or predictable.

4. Competitive Positioning

The patent's strength depends on:

  • The degree of novelty of the chemical entity
  • The unexpected therapeutic benefits
  • The breadth of claim language

Patent challengers are likely to focus on prior art that involves structurally similar compounds or formulations, potentially narrowing the patent's enforceability.


Advantages and Limitations

Advantages:

  • Exclusivity: A granted Hong Kong patent offers up to 20 years of protection, facilitating market exclusivity.
  • Regional Strategy: Hong Kong’s IP regime acts as a gateway to access/APAC markets.
  • Potential Licensing Opportunities: Broad claims or key structural features can attract licensing deals.

Limitations:

  • Narrow Claims: Overly specific claims may limit enforcement scope.
  • Existence of Prior Art: Similar compounds or formulations could challenge patent validity.
  • Patent Term Constraints: Patent life may be affected by regulatory data exclusivity or patent term adjustments.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

  • Claims Drafting: Future patents should aim for claims that balance breadth and specificity to maximize enforceability.
  • Validity Promotion: Conduct thorough prior art searches and Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)-style validity analyses before enforcement.
  • Landscape Monitoring: Keep abreast of competitors' filings and technological trends, especially in APAC and international jurisdictions.
  • Therapeutic and Formulation Claims: Broaden claims to include both composition and methods of use, expanding commercial potential.

Key Takeaways

  • HK1126477 likely covers a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation with specific structure, manufacturing, or therapeutic claims.
  • The patent’s enforceability depends on claim drafting quality and the extent of prior art.
  • The Hong Kong patent landscape is competitive, requiring detailed landscape and validity assessments.
  • Strategic patent formulation, coupled with proactive portfolio management, can maximize commercial value.
  • Protecting innovations internationally necessitates alignments with broader patent families and jurisdictions.

FAQs

1. How does the scope of Hong Kong patent HK1126477 compare with international patents?
Hong Kong patents are generally narrower, focusing on local protection, but can be part of broader international patent strategies through PCT applications, aligning claims and scope across jurisdictions.

2. What are the main challenges in defending a pharmaceutical patent like HK1126477?
The primary challenges include prior art overlaps, demonstrating inventive step, and ensuring claim broadness without overreach that could lead to invalidity.

3. Can the claims of HK1126477 be easily designed around?
Depending on claim breadth, competitors may modify key structural features or formulation parameters, especially if claims are narrowly drafted. Broader claims offer more robust protection but may face validity hurdles.

4. How can patent landscape analysis affect commercial decisions regarding this patent?
It highlights potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and FTO issues, guiding decisions on R&D, marketing, and partnership strategies.

5. What role does patent lifecycle management play for HK1126477?
Proactive management, including supplementary protective patents, patent term extensions, and enforcement, sustains commercial advantage and maximizes patent value over time.


Sources:

[1] Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. "Patents." Accessed 2023.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. "Patent Landscape Reports." 2022.
[3] European Patent Office. "Interpretation of Patent Claims." 2021.
[4] PatentScope. "Patent Family Information for Pharmaceutical Inventions." 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.