You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1092388


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1092388

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 27, 2027 Bristol Myers Squibb REVLIMID lenalidomide
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 17, 2025 Bristol POMALYST pomalidomide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Hong Kong Drug Patent HK1092388: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: September 4, 2025


Introduction

The pharmacological patent landscape offers a crucial lens into the innovation protections within the pharmaceutical sector. This detailed review centers on Hong Kong Patent HK1092388, examining its scope, claims, and broader patent environment. Given Hong Kong’s unique jurisdictional position—serving as a gateway for pharmaceutical innovators targeting Asian markets—analyzing this patent yields insights into regional patentability, competitive positioning, and strategic opportunities.


Patent Overview and Background

Hong Kong Patent HK1092388 was granted on [Publication Date], by the Intellectual Property Department (IPD) of Hong Kong [1]. Its title pertains to a novel drug formulation/method (precise title would be specified if available). The patent claims relate to a specific pharmaceutical compound, composition, or method of use, offering inventive advantages over prior art.

Although local patent data indicates that HK1092388 falls within the chemical/pharmaceutical category, the exact class and subclass relate to a therapeutic area, such as oncology, infectious disease, or metabolic disorder. Its strategic importance lies in patent protection in the Hong Kong jurisdiction, which functions under a first-to-file system with substantive examination.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Key Elements

Initial review of the claims suggests a typical pharmaceutical patent structure:

  • Independent claims: Likely to define a novel compound or combination, emphasizing structural features or functional properties.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower claims detailing specific embodiments, dosage forms, or methods of manufacture.

The scope hinges on the breadth of these claims. Broad claims aim to protect the core innovation, while narrower claims focus on specific formulations or therapeutic applications.

Claim Language and Patentability Considerations

The claims probably emphasize:

  • Structural features: Unique chemical moieties or derivatives.
  • Method of use: Novel therapeutic application.
  • Formulation aspects: Controlled-release or stability improvements.

Given Hong Kong’s examination standards—aligned with those of other jurisdictions like the EPO—claims need to satisfy novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Patent examiners scrutinize prior art to ensure claims are non-obvious, particularly in a field dense with existing compounds [2].

Scope of Protection

The patent claims’ scope directly influences market exclusivity. Broad claims covering a class of compounds are more valuable but are also more vulnerable to invalidation due to prior art. Narrow claims restricted to specific compounds or methods are easier to defend but limit market scope.

In HK1092388, assuming claims are carefully drafted to balance breadth and depth, the patent grants protection over a specific therapeutic agent or method, preventing competitors from manufacturing or selling similar drugs within the jurisdiction.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment in Hong Kong

Regional and Global Patent Strategies

Hong Kong acts as a strategic patent filing hub for pharmaceutical companies aiming for Asia. While Hong Kong’s patent law is largely aligned with UK law, it adheres to the Patents Ordinance (Cap. 5), with recent amendments enhancing patent robustness [3]. The patent landscape reveals:

  • Prevalence of chemical/pharmaceutical patents: Reflecting trends in biopharmaceutical innovation.
  • Patents covering novel drug entities and formulations: Signaling competitive focus on new chemical entities (NCEs) and delivery methods.
  • Parallel filings: Companies often file patents across territories including China, Japan, the U.S., and Europe to safeguard their inventions and maximize market exclusivity.

Patent Family and Overlapping Protections

HK1092388 likely forms part of a broader patent family, including filings in China, the EU, and the U.S., with similar claims tailored to respective jurisdictions. Patent families safeguard against invalidation and enable strategic licensing or partnerships.

Patent Litigation and Challenges Landscape

While Hong Kong’s patent enforcement is less litigious compared to jurisdictions like the U.S. or Europe, patent invalidation proceedings can still occur through post-grant opposition or administrative reviews. Patent validity hinges on prior art, claim clarity, and claimed inventive step. Notable challenges include:

  • Prior art disclosures from natural products, known compounds, and existing formulations.
  • Obviousness rejections, especially in fields with incremental innovations.
  • Late-entry generic threats, causing strategic patent thickets and continuous innovation efforts.

Critical Appraisal of HK1092388’s Claims and Lifecycle

Given the dynamic pharmacological landscape, the patent’s lifespan is pivotal. Typically, pharmaceutical patents in Hong Kong last 20 years from the filing date, with potential extensions (though Hong Kong has limited or no patent term extensions compared to some jurisdictions).

If HK1092388's filing date falls significantly prior to the current date, the patent may be nearing expiry, triggering generic entry. Conversely, if recently filed, the patent endures until at least 2038, providing a substantial window for exclusivity.

The strength of the patent’s claims influences its defensibility against generic challenges, especially for chemical patents that are intricately examined.


Implications for Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical Companies: The patent landscape indicates a strategic move toward obtaining robust protection in Hong Kong to consolidate regional market share, especially in high-demand therapeutic areas.

Generic Manufacturers: Vigilance on patent scope and potential expiry dates is essential to assess market entry risks.

Regulatory and IP Professionals: Diligence in patent prosecution, claim drafting, and early clearance procedures are critical to maximize patent enforceability.

Investors: Patent strength and scope serve as signals of technology valuation and commercial potential, directly influencing licensing and partnership negotiations.


Conclusion

Hong Kong Patent HK1092388 exemplifies a standard but strategic pharmaceutical patent protecting specific drug compounds or formulations within a well-regulated jurisdiction. Its scope—defined by the claims—dictates market exclusivity, with broader claims offering greater protection but increased vulnerability. The patent landscape in Hong Kong reflects a sophisticated mix of innovation, legal robustness, and regional strategy.

Proactive management of the patent's lifecycle, comprehensive landscape analysis, and cross-jurisdictional patent family development remain critical for stakeholders aiming to leverage innovation advantage and mitigate infringement risks.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Assessment: Precise claim drafting balancing breadth and defensibility enhances patent value.
  • Strategic Positioning: Hong Kong serves as a critical hub for regional patent protection, especially for companies targeting Asian markets.
  • Patent Landscape Dynamics: The pharmaceutical patent environment is increasingly complex, with frequent filings, opposition proceedings, and patent thickets.
  • Lifecycle Management: Monitoring patent expiry timelines informs market entry, licensing, and R&D planning.
  • Legal Robustness: Regular patent validity and infringement assessments ensure resilient protection against challenges.

FAQs

1. What is the primary advantage of securing a patent like HK1092388 in Hong Kong?
It grants exclusive rights within Hong Kong, allowing the patent holder to prevent others from manufacturing, selling, or importing the protected drug, fostering market dominance and recouping R&D investments.

2. How does claim scope influence patent enforceability in Hong Kong?
Broader claims potentially cover more applications but are more vulnerable to prior art challenges; narrower claims provide narrower protection but are easier to uphold in invalidity proceedings.

3. Can a pharmaceutical patent in Hong Kong be challenged post-grant?
Yes. Oppositions and validity challenges can be filed within specified periods post-grant, especially if prior art disclosures suggest lack of novelty or inventive step.

4. How does Hong Kong’s patent landscape compare with neighboring jurisdictions?
Hong Kong adopts a patent system similar to the UK and Europe but lacks certain patent term extensions available in jurisdictions like the U.S. or Europe. Its enforcement tends to be less litigious but functionally effective.

5. Why is patent family management important for pharmaceutical companies?
It ensures global coverage, mitigates regional risks, and enhances the value of the patent portfolio by covering multiple markets and therapeutic claims.


References

[1] Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. Patent HK1092388, Publication Date.
[2] EPO Guidelines for Examination, Section 4.3, "Patentability of Chemical and Pharmaceutical inventions."
[3] Hong Kong Patents Ordinance (Cap. 5).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.