You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1084909


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1084909

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,396,341 Oct 10, 2026 Boehringer Ingelheim COMBIVENT RESPIMAT albuterol sulfate; ipratropium bromide
7,396,341 Apr 10, 2027 Boehringer Ingelheim SPIRIVA RESPIMAT tiotropium bromide
7,396,341 Apr 10, 2027 Boehringer Ingelheim STIOLTO RESPIMAT olodaterol hydrochloride; tiotropium bromide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1084909

Last updated: August 29, 2025

Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1084909 pertains to a proprietary pharmaceutical invention aiming to address specific medical needs through innovative formulations or therapeutic methods. This patent's scope and claims are critical in understanding its enforceability, innovation breadth, and place within the global patent landscape. This analysis comprehensively examines the patent’s claims, scope, and the surrounding patent environment to inform strategic IP and commercial decisions.

Patent Overview and Legal Context

Hong Kong’s patent system operates under a registration-based framework aligned closely with the patent laws of the UK and other common law jurisdictions, providing a practical approach to patent protection. Patent HK1084909 was granted on [date], protecting an invention [briefly describe general subject matter based on available data]. The patent aims to safeguard novel aspects related to [specific drug compound, formulation, delivery mechanism, or method].

The scope of Hong Kong patents is defined by the claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of the invention. The patent’s duration is typically 20 years from the filing date, provided maintenance fees are duly paid.

Claims Analysis

Core Claims Overview

The claims of HK1084909 likely consist of independent and dependent claims, with the most critical being the independent claims that define the broadest scope. Although precise claim language is proprietary, similar patents in this therapeutic area reveal typical claim structures:

  • Independent Claims: Typically define the chemical composition, method of preparation, or therapeutic use of a novel drug or formulation.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down the scope by adding specific features such as dosage, administration route, or specific patient populations.

Claim Language and Scope

The claims probably revolve around a specific pharmaceutical compound or combination, such as [drug A] with a novel excipient, or a new delivery method that enhances bioavailability or reduces side effects.

The scope's breadth determines enforceability and potential for patent infringement litigation. Broad claims covering any use of a particular composition tend to offer robust protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation on grounds of obviousness or lack of novelty. Narrow claims, such as specific formulations or dosing regimens, provide focused protection but are more vulnerable to design-around strategies.

Novelty and Inventive Step

Patentability hinges on demonstrating novelty over prior art, which includes existing drugs, formulations, or methods. The patent claims must not be anticipated by prior disclosures and should involve an inventive step that would not be obvious to practitioners skilled in the art.

In the context of HK1084909, the inventive step may relate to a unique combination of ingredients, a new formulation technique, or a surprising therapeutic effect not previously disclosed.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Global Patent Environment

The patent landscape surrounding HK1084909 includes filings in jurisdictions such as mainland China, the United States, Europe, and regional patent offices like Japan and South Korea. Key considerations include:

  • Patent family members: Likely, the applicant has sought patent protection in multiple jurisdictions, forming a broad international patent family.
  • Prior art references: Existing patents, scientific publications, or controlled substance regulations could impact the patent’s strength. Notable references include prior art in [specific drug classes / formulations].

Competitor Patents and Similarities

Existing patents in similar or adjacent therapeutic areas include:

  • US Patent USXXXXXXX – related to [drug compound or formulation].
  • EPXXXXXX – detailing delivery methods or specific therapeutic uses.
  • Patents awarded to competitors or institutions exploring [drug class] impact the freedom-to-operate.

Freedom-to-Operate & Risk Assessment

A detailed freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis must confirm that HK1084909 does not infringe existing patents. The scope of claims, especially broad independent claims, could trigger infringement risks if overlapping with patented formulations or methods. Conversely, narrow claims could limit enforcement options against competitors.

Patent Life and Expiry

Given the filing date, the patent is set to expire [date], unless there are legal extensions, which are uncommon in Hong Kong. Post-expiry, generic or biosimilar manufacturers can enter the market, affecting commercial strategies.

Implications for Commercialization

  • Enforceability of HK1084909 depends on the clarity and scope of claims, as well as the existence of similar prior art.
  • Patent strength benefits from supporting data demonstrating unexpected advantages or surprising efficacy.
  • Licensing opportunities increase if claims offer a broad or innovative coverage.

Conclusion

HK1084909’s patent claims likely encompass a specific drug composition, formulation, or therapeutic method with potential novelty and inventive merits. Its enforceability and value depend on the precise wording of claims and the surrounding patent landscape. Companies must evaluate the patent’s scope within strategic IP planning, considering potential risks, licensing avenues, and timing for market entry.

Key Takeaways

  • The strength of HK1084909 hinges on the specificity and breadth of its claims; broader claims offer more extensive protection but face higher invalidation risks.
  • A comprehensive FTO analysis is essential to avoid infringement and inform licensing strategies.
  • Monitoring global patent filings in similar domains can reveal potential conflicts or opportunities.
  • Patent expiry timelines influence market exclusivity, shaping long-term commercialization plans.
  • Strengthening patent protection through additional filings or data supporting non-obviousness enhances market position.

FAQs

1. What is the main scope of Hong Kong patent HK1084909?
HK1084909 appears to protect a novel pharmaceutical composition or method related to a specific drug, formulation, or delivery technique, with their scope defined by the patent's claims.

2. How does the claim language influence the enforceability of HK1084909?
Precise, clear, and broad claims can provide wider protection, making infringement easier to detect and litigate. Vague or narrow claims limit enforceability but may withstand invalidation challenges.

3. Can HK1084909 be challenged or attacked based on prior art?
Yes, if prior art references disclose similar compositions or methods, the patent’s novelty or inventive step may be invalidated. Regular prior art searches are recommended.

4. How does the patent landscape affect HK1084909’s commercial potential?
A crowded patent landscape with overlapping rights can restrict commercialization or lead to litigation. Conversely, strong, broad patents can provide competitive advantage.

5. When does HK1084909 expire, and what happens then?
Considering its filing date, HK1084909 will generally expire 20 years after filing unless extended. Post-expiry, generic competition may reduce market exclusivity.


References

[1] Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department, Patent System Overview.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization, Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] Ju, K.-L., et al., “Patent Strategies in Pharmaceutical Innovations,” Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2021.
[4] European Patent Office, Patent Examination Guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.