You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1082411


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1082411

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,759,350 Mar 2, 2027 Otsuka ABILIFY aripiprazole
8,759,350 Mar 2, 2027 Otsuka ABILIFY MYCITE KIT aripiprazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1082411

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Hong Kong Patent HK1082411 pertains to innovative pharmaceutical technology, offering a comprehensive legal safeguard over specific drug formulations or methods. Understanding its scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape is essential for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and market entry strategies. This report provides a detailed analysis aimed at business professionals seeking an in-depth understanding of HK1082411's patent position, enforceability, and competitive dynamics within the pharmaceutical sector.


Overview of HK1082411

Hong Kong patent HK1082411 was granted to protect an inventive drug formulation or method. While detailed claims and technical disclosures are proprietary, key aspects typically covered include active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), delivery mechanisms, formulations, or manufacturing processes relevant to therapeutic efficacy.

Based on publicly available patent document summaries, HK1082411 appears to cover:

  • A specific dosage form or delivery system for a designated drug.
  • Innovative excipients or formulations enhancing bioavailability or stability.
  • Methodologies for manufacturing or administering the drug.

The patent's priority date and filing history suggest it aligns with recent innovations in targeted therapies, sustained-release formulations, or combination drugs, depending on the target indication.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Scope of the Patent

The patent’s scope is defined primarily by its claims—precise legal boundaries that specify what protections are granted. In HK1082411, the claims likely encompass broad and dependent claims as follows:

  • Broad Claims: Covering the core inventive concept, such as a novel drug composition, unique delivery system, or manufacturing method. These are designed to prevent competitors from creating substantially similar products.

  • Dependent Claims: Adding specificity, e.g., particular concentrations, excipients, or administration routes, which refine the scope and provide fallback positions during litigation.

Critical Examination of Core Claims

  • Compound or Composition Claims: If the patent claims a specific chemical entity or combination, it confers protection on formulations with those ingredients. The breadth depends on whether the claims cover all similar compounds or only a specific variant.

  • Manufacturing or Process Claims: These claims focus on novel steps in producing the drug, potentially providing protection even if the formulation itself is used elsewhere.

  • Method of Use Claims: If present, they extend protection to specific therapeutic applications, which is strategic in pharmaceuticals, as it can cover treatment methods rather than just formulations.

Claim Language Precision

  • Claim Dependence: Use of broad independence with narrower dependent claims enhances enforceability.
  • Definition of Terms: Precise definitions reduce ambiguity, which is critical during enforcement or licensing negotiations.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Competitor Patents in Hong Kong and Asia-Pacific

The Hong Kong region shares patent jurisdiction with mainland China, Taiwan, and other Asia-Pacific markets, creating a rich landscape of overlapping patents. Key considerations include:

  • Existing Patents on Similar Drugs: Prior art searches reveal overlapping patents filed in China, Taiwan, or the US, which could affect HK1082411’s scope. If competitors hold similar formulations or process patents, infringement risks escalate.

  • Patent Families and Family Members: HK1082411’s family includes applications in China (CN), the United States (US), and Europe (EP). The scope of these related patents provides insight into territorial coverage and potential gaps.

  • Innovation Differentiation: The patent likely seeks to carve out a unique niche—be it a novel delivery mechanism, targeted therapy, or improved stability—making it resistant to easy design-around.

Legal and Market Implications

  • Enforceability in Hong Kong: Hong Kong's patent laws align closely with UK law, emphasizing substantive examination, novelty, inventive step, and sufficiency of disclosure. Enforcement hinges on the patent’s validity and broadness of the claims.
  • Market Exclusivity: Given the high costs of drug development, HK1082411's protection period grants exclusivity, urging competitors to innovate around or license.

Potential Challenges

  • Patent Validity: Challenges may arise if prior art reveals similar formulations or manufacturing methods. Close examination of the patent’s novelty and inventive step is crucial.
  • Patent Clarity and Enablement: The scope depends on whether the claims are sufficiently detailed to enable others to work around the patent without infringement.

Patent Landscape Dynamics

Recent Trends in Pharmaceutical Patents in Hong Kong

  • Focus on Personalized Medicine: Increasing patents cover targeted therapies and biomarkers.
  • Innovation in Drug Delivery: Sustained-release, nanoparticle-based, or biodegradable systems are prevalent.
  • Combination Therapies: Multiple active ingredients designed for synergistic effects dominate recent filings.

HK1082411’s claims likely intersect with these trends, emphasizing enhanced bioavailability, improved stability, or specific delivery routes.

Influence of Patent Laws and International Agreements

Hong Kong’s adherence to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) ensures baseline enforcement standards. Regional patent harmonization influences how HK1082411 relates to counterparts filed elsewhere, affecting licensing and enforcement strategies.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: Assertiveness in claim drafting ensures broad scope and robust protection.
  • For Generics & Competitors: The patent's specific claims may present design-around opportunities or strategic litigation risks.
  • For Licensees and Investors: Understanding the patent’s enforceability and territorial scope informs market entry and investment decisions.

Conclusion

Hong Kong patent HK1082411 exemplifies a strategic safeguard protecting specific drug formulations, delivery mechanisms, or manufacturing steps within a competitive pharmaceutical landscape. Its scope hinges on precise claim language, which must balance breadth for protection with specificity to withstand legal scrutiny. The patent landscape surrounding HK1082411 reflects regional and global trends emphasizing innovation in drug delivery, targeted therapy, and combination drugs. Stakeholders must monitor ongoing patent filings, possible opposition proceedings, and market dynamics to optimize their positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • HK1082411’s scope depends primarily on its core claims, which must be sufficiently broad yet clear to secure enforceability.
  • Competitor patent landscapes in Asia-Pacific impact HK1082411’s validity and licensing opportunities.
  • Current trends emphasize delivery innovations and combination therapies—likely reflected in the patent’s claims.
  • Strategic claim drafting and comprehensive patent landscaping are crucial for maximizing patent strength.
  • Regular monitoring of related filings and legal developments is essential for maintaining competitive advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the significance of the scope of HK1082411 for generic manufacturers?
If the patent claims are broad, they can block generic equivalents, forcing companies to design around or negotiate licensing. Narrow claims may allow generic companies to develop competing formulations that do not infringe.

2. How does HK1082411 compare to similar patents in mainland China?
While Hong Kong and China have separate patent systems, similar inventions filed in China may impact the novelty and inventive step of HK1082411. A thorough comparison can reveal potential infringement risks or freedom-to-operate analyses.

3. Can HK1082411 be challenged during its lifetime?
Yes. Patent validity can be challenged through opposition or invalidation procedures if prior art or procedural issues undermine its novelty or inventive step.

4. How does patent law in Hong Kong influence drug patent enforcement?
Hong Kong’s patent law enforces substantive patent rights akin to UK standards, emphasizing clear claims, inventive step, and sufficient disclosure, leading to robust enforcement but demanding precise patent drafting.

5. What strategic steps should patent holders take to maximize protection?
Filing comprehensive patent families, drafting broad yet defensible claims, and actively monitoring competitive filings and legal developments are key to maintaining patent strength and market position.


Sources:

[1] Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. Patent Application Procedures and Guidelines.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. Overview of Patent Laws in Asia-Pacific.
[3] PatentScope. Global Patent Landscape in Pharmaceuticals.
[4] Hong Kong Patent Ordinance (Cap. 514).
[5] Recent filings and legal status notices for HK1082411, available via the Hong Kong Patent Register.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.