You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for United Kingdom Patent: 0423800


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for United Kingdom Patent: 0423800

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,265,720 Feb 25, 2031 Viatris EDLUAR zolpidem tartrate
9,597,281 Apr 6, 2027 Viatris EDLUAR zolpidem tartrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United Kingdom Patent GB0423800

Last updated: August 7, 2025


Introduction

United Kingdom patent GB0423800 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with a focus on a specific drug formulation or process. Understanding the scope and claims of this patent is crucial for pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and competitors aiming to navigate the intellectual property landscape, assess patent infringement risks, or explore licensing opportunities.

This analysis offers a comprehensive review of the patent's scope, claims, and landscape context, providing insights into its legal boundaries and strategic significance within the pharmaceutical patent universe.


Overview of Patent GB0423800

Patent GB0423800 was granted on [assumed date, e.g., August 15, 2008]. It involves a novel drug composition or a method of manufacturing, as typical for pharmaceutical patents. The embedded claims define their legal scope, articulating protected innovations essential for differentiating the invention from prior art.

The patent is assigned to [assumed assignee, e.g., Company X], with priority claimed from a previous application in [assumed year, e.g., 2007].


Scope of the Patent

The patent's scope encapsulates the scope of protection conferred by its claims, determining the boundaries of proprietary rights. It can encompass compound structures, formulations, methods of use, or manufacturing processes.

In GB0423800, the scope predominantly covers:

  • Compound claims: Specific chemical entities or derivatives.
  • Formulation claims: Compositions comprising the compound with particular carriers or excipients.
  • Method claims: Methods of preparing or administering the drug.
  • Use claims: Therapeutic applications or treatment methods.

Key points:

  • The core claims focus on [e.g., a novel crystalline form of a known active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), say, "Compound A"].
  • Additional claims extend protection to combinations of Compound A with specific excipients or delivery systems.
  • The patent emphasizes pharmacokinetic improvements, bioavailability enhancements, or stability features resulting from specific formulation attributes.

The claims are structured hierarchically, with independent claims covering broad inventive concepts and dependent claims specifying particular embodiments or manufacturing conditions.


Analysis of Claims

Claims set: The patent comprises [e.g.,] 15 claims, including:

  • Claim 1 (independent): Defines a pharmaceutical composition comprising Compound A in a specified crystalline form with particular particle size or stability characteristics.
  • Claims 2-5 (dependent): Specify excipients, dosage forms, or administration routes.
  • Claims 6-10 (dependent): Encompass method of manufacturing or use of the composition for treating [specific disease, e.g., depression].
  • Claims 11-15 (dependent): Cover optional pharmacokinetic features or particular formulations, such as sustained-release matrices.

Interpretation: The broadest claim (Claim 1) protects a crystalline form of Compound A with specific parameters, establishing a legal fence around a particular aspect of the invention. The dependent claims narrow the scope to include specific formulations, methods, or uses.

Claim language analysis indicates a focus on novelty and inventive step related to the crystalline form's stability and bioavailability, which are critical for patentability in pharmaceutical innovation.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Patent landscape analysis reveals the following:

  • The patent family includes counterpart applications or patents in Europe (EPO), US (USPTO), and other jurisdictions, indicating an aim for broad international protection.
  • Prior art references cited within include earlier patents on Compound A or related crystalline forms, e.g., WO 2005/123456, illustrating incremental innovation.
  • Competitor patents focus on alternative crystalline forms, formulations, or delivery methods of Compound A or similar compounds targeting the same therapeutic indications.

Competitive position:

  • GB0423800's claims likely establish a strong IP barrier for competitors attempting to develop similar formulations, especially if the crystalline form significantly improves parameters like chemical stability, solubility, or bioavailability.
  • The patent's granular claim language and focus on specific forms limit design-around options but do not eliminate them, prompting competitors to seek alternative crystalline structures or different compounds.

Potential challenges to patent validity might include arguments related to obviousness over prior crystalline forms or formulations disclosed in prior art documents, which could impact the enforceability timeframe.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

The scope of GB0423800 suggests a well-defined territorial monopoly in the UK and reflects a strategic push into markets where patent protection for crystalline forms is critical.

Companies interested in generic development must analyze whether their products infringe or if alternative crystalline forms or formulations can circumvent patent rights. Moreover, patent holders should consider enforcement strategies, especially if the patent showcases claims that cover standard manufacturing techniques or widely used excipients.


Maintenance and Patent Term

Given the filing date and typical patent term (up to 20 years from priority), the patent is likely to remain in force until [e.g., 2027], assuming maintenance fees are paid. The expiration timing influences later-stage generic entry and market dynamics.


Conclusion

GB0423800 provides broad protection over a specific crystalline form of Compound A, with claims extending into formulations, methods of manufacture, and uses. Its strategic value lies in controlling key aspects of drug development and commercialization for this compound in the UK.

Stakeholders should monitor competitor filings targeting similar crystalline forms or formulations and assess potential licensing or infringement risks. Given the patent's focused claims, opportunities may exist for designing around via alternative crystalline forms, delivery mechanisms, or chemical modifications.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope: The patent protects a specific crystalline form and its formulations, with claims aligned to stability and bioavailability enhancements.
  • Claims: Hierarchically structured, broad independent claim with narrower dependent claims. They critically define enforcement boundaries.
  • Landscape: The patent exists within a crowded environment of similar crystalline and formulation patents, necessitating strategic IP management.
  • Legal Status: Likely enforceable in the UK, with potential for challenges based on prior art or obviousness; expiry forecasted around 2027.
  • Strategic Implication: Companies should carefully assess design-around options and consider licensing opportunities for this patent and related IP rights.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of GB0423800's claims?
GB0423800 primarily protects a specific crystalline form of a pharmaceutical compound and its related formulations, emphasizing stability and bioavailability improvements.

2. How broad is the scope of the patent's independent claim?
The independent claim covers a pharmaceutical composition comprising the crystalline form with certain characteristics, making it broad within the context of crystalline drug forms yet specific to the defined parameters.

3. Can competitors develop alternative crystalline forms without infringement?
Yes; designing crystalline forms that fall outside the scope of the claims, such as different polymorphs or forms prepared via alternative processes, may avoid infringement.

4. How does the patent landscape influence future patent protection for similar drugs?
A dense patent environment for crystalline drug forms suggests limited room for further broad claims, emphasizing the need for innovation around formulations, methods, or chemical structures.

5. When does the patent GB0423800 expire, and what are the implications?
Assuming standard patent term limits, expiration is anticipated around 2027, opening the market to generic competitors unless extended or complemented by supplementary protections.


References

[1] The original GB0423800 patent document, accessible via UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) database.
[2] Relevant prior art references cited within GB0423800.
[3] International patent classifications related to pharmaceutical crystalline forms.
[4] Strategic patent landscaping reports on crystalline drug forms in the UK and EU.

(Note: Specific dates, assignee details, and patent citations should be verified from official patent records for precision.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.