You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for France Patent: 24C1013


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for France Patent: 24C1013

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,357,690 Feb 26, 2031 Daiichi Sankyo Inc VANFLYTA quizartinib dihydrochloride
8,836,218 Mar 23, 2030 Daiichi Sankyo Inc VANFLYTA quizartinib dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for France Patent FR24C1013

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

France patent FR24C1013 (hereafter "the patent") pertains to a pharmaceutical invention within the scope of medicinal compounds or formulations. While the specific legal status and detailed claim set require access to detailed patent documents (e.g., via the French patent office or EPO databases), an initial comprehensive analysis can be performed based on publicly available data. This article dissects the scope, methodology, claims, patent landscape, and strategic importance of FR24C1013 to inform industry stakeholders, R&D teams, and patent professionals.


Patent Identification and Documentation

Patent Number & Filing Details:

  • French Patent Number: FR24C1013
  • Filing Date: Assumed to be recent based on the "C" designation, indicating a patent application with a significant life span—likely filed within the last five years (specific date would depend on official documentation).

Technical Field:

  • Likely situated within pharmaceutical compositions, drug delivery systems, or targeted therapeutics, considering similar patent classifications and usual scope for France's patent classification—possibly under the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes such as A61K or A61P.

Legal Status:

  • The legal status (pending, granted, opposed, or lapsed) influences scope interpretation. For our analysis, assume the patent has been examined and issued, conferring exclusive rights in France, with potential equivalents in Europe or internationally.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Claim Set:
The claims define the legal scope of the patent’s protection. Although without access to the full claims text, a typical proprietary drug patent could encompass:

  • Compound Claims: Novel chemical entities or derivatives with specific structural features.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific formulations including the active ingredient, excipients, and delivery mechanisms.
  • Method Claims: Methods of synthesis, treatment methods, or administration techniques.
  • Use Claims: Specific therapeutic uses or indications.

2. Claim Construction:

  • The primary claims are likely narrow, centering on the specific compound or formulation invented.
  • Dependent claims refine the scope, adding specific features—such as particular substituents, purity levels, or dosing regimens.

3. Patentable Features:

  • The inventive aspect probably lies in a unique structure providing enhanced efficacy, stability, or targeted delivery.
  • Alternatively, broad claims might cover a class of compounds with a shared core structure for a new therapeutic pathway.

4. Potential Overlaps and Prior Art:

  • Similar compounds are protected under existing patents; the novelty hinges on unique structural modifications, advantageous pharmacokinetic properties, or innovative use methods.
  • The scope might avoid pre-existing patents by emphasizing novel substituents, combination therapies, or specific formulation techniques.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

1. European and International Patent Coverage:

  • France's patent system is part of the European Patent Convention. FR24C1013 may serve as a national phase entry for broader European or international filings (e.g., via PCT).
  • Analysis of similar patents indicates a competitive landscape involving major pharmaceutical players, often overlapping in the same therapeutic class.

2. Competitor Patent Activity:

  • Major pharma companies patent complementary or competing compounds within similar therapeutic targets such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases.
  • Patent landscapes reveal clusters of related patents, indicating strategic blocking or freedom-to-operate assessments.

3. Patent Families and Family Members:

  • Likely associated with international patent families, extending protection beyond France to key markets including the EU, US, Japan, and China.
  • The extent of family coverage impacts market exclusivity and licensing opportunities.

4. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle Management:

  • Assuming the patent was filed recently, patent protection extends approximately 20 years from the filing date, offering long-term strategic benefits.
  • Lifecycle management may involve securing additional patents on improved formulations or delivery systems.

5. Litigation and Enforcement Landscape:

  • Active enforcement within France or European courts can delineate the boundaries of the patent's scope, especially during litigation over infringement or validity challenges.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

1. R&D Strategies:

  • The patent's scope implications guide the R&D focus—either on developing workarounds or adjacent inventions.
  • The claims' breadth directly influence the freedom to innovate in the therapeutic class.

2. Licensing and Commercialization:

  • The patent landscape indicates potential licensing opportunities or challenges.
  • Effective positioning depends on the patent's broadness, strength, and territorial coverage.

3. Competitive Advantage:

  • A well-crafted patent with broad claims secures a market advantage against generic entrants and competitors.

Conclusion

France patent FR24C1013 appears to encompass a novel compound or formulation within a specified therapeutic class, with claims likely focusing on structural uniqueness or innovative use methods. Its strategic value hinges on the scope and strength of its claims, surrounding patent landscape, and potential for international extension. Stakeholders must conduct a detailed claim chart comparison, legal status review, and patent family analysis to fully elucidate its market and R&D implications.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of FR24C1013 primarily hinges on its claims, which likely cover a novel chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic use.
  • Broader claims increase market protection but are more susceptible to validity challenges rooted in prior art.
  • The patent landscape in France and Europe is crowded within pharmaceutical fields, emphasizing the importance of claim strength and strategic patent family expansion.
  • For effective commercialization, aligning patent protection with ongoing R&D efforts ensures competitive advantage.
  • Continuous monitoring of legal status, potential litigations, and relevant generic challengers is critical to safeguarding market share.

FAQs

Q1: How can I determine the exact scope of the claims for FR24C1013?
A: Access the full patent document via the French patent office or EPO database, and analyze the claims section to understand the scope and specific protections granted.

Q2: Does the patent cover international markets?
A: Likely not directly; however, the patent family associated with FR24C1013 may extend protection through PCT filings or European equivalents, enabling market-specific patent applications.

Q3: How does claim breadth affect patent enforceability?
A: Broader claims provide wider protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation based on prior art; narrower claims are easier to defend but limit scope.

Q4: What are the key considerations for designing around this patent?
A: Focus on structural modifications outside the scope of the claims, or develop different formulations/methods not covered by the patent, provided these do not infringe existing claims.

Q5: How does the patent landscape influence licensing strategies?
A: An active competitive landscape suggests licensing opportunities for complementary or adjacent innovations, but also potential patent thickets requiring careful freedom-to-operate assessments.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent document for FR24C1013 (searchable via Espacenet).
  2. French National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI). Official patent status.
  3. Patent landscape reports for the therapeutic category (e.g., oncology, neurology).
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent family and international application data.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.