You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 3017701


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 3017701

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 3, 2038 Glenmark Speclt RYALTRIS mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 8, 2039 Glenmark Speclt RYALTRIS mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent ES3017701: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 21, 2025

Introduction

Patent ES3017701 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered in Spain, with implications across the drug development landscape. Its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent environment influence strategic decisions by pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal practitioners. This analysis offers a detailed examination of the patent's scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape.


Patent Overview: ES3017701

ES3017701 was granted to protect a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation. The patent’s filing date, priority, and expiry define its temporal scope in the market. While the precise chemical or therapeutic focus requires access to detailed patent documents, typical pharmaceutical patents of this nature tend to encompass compositions, methods of use, and manufacturing processes.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope and Breadth

The scope of ES3017701 primarily hinges on its claims, which delineate the boundaries of patent protection. The scope is generally categorized into:

  • Compound claims: Covering a specific chemical entity or derivatives.
  • Use claims: Covering specific therapeutic applications.
  • Formulation claims: Covering specific compositions or delivery mechanisms.
  • Method claims: Covering manufacturing or administration processes.

The breadth of the patent depends on whether claims are composition-based (claiming the chemical entity itself), use-based (claiming a particular therapeutic indication), or formulation-specific. Broad claims can extend protection to structurally similar compounds or alternative formulations, while narrow claims restrict protection to explicitly described embodiments.

Claim Type and Strategy

If ES3017701 contains broad structural claims, it may inhibit the development of generic versions or close analogs, depending on the language. Conversely, narrow or purpose-specific claims may limit the patent’s enforcement but allow alternative approaches by competitors.

The strategic drafting of claims typically aims to:

  • Maximize scope: Covering as many variants as possible.
  • Ensure validity: Avoiding overly broad claims that may be challenged or invalidated on grounds of obviousness or lack of novelty.

Claim Interpretation

The interpretation of claims follows the scope dictated by the European Patent Convention (EPC) standards, emphasizing the patent’s wording, description, and drawings. The doctrine of equivalents can extend protection beyond explicit claim wording but is subject to legal constraints.


Claims Analysis

While exact claim language is inaccessible without the patent document, typical claims for pharmaceutical patents like ES3017701 include:

1. Compound Claims

These define the chemical entity or derivatives with specific stereochemistry, molecular weight, or substitution patterns.

2. Use Claims

Claiming therapeutic applications, such as treatment of specific diseases—e.g., oncology, CNS disorders, metabolic diseases.

3. Formulation Claims

Claims covering specific formulations, such as sustained-release, injectable, or topical forms.

4. Process Claims

Claims claiming synthesis routes or manufacturing methods, which help safeguard production techniques and optimize patent enforceability.


Patent Landscape in Spain and Europe

Regional and Global Context

Spain’s patent system aligns with the EPC, facilitating a harmonized approach across Europe. For pharmaceutical patents like ES3017701, the patent landscape includes:

  • European Patent Office (EPO) filings: Many patents are filed through the EPO, which can lead to unitary or bundle protections extended into Spain.
  • National phase entries: ES3017701 may represent a national phase entry following an international application, providing localized protection.
  • Patent families: The patent likely belongs to a family covering multiple jurisdictions, seeking broad regional protection.

Overlap with Other Patents

The patent landscape includes:

  • Blocking patents (e.g., related compounds, formulations, or methods), which could hinder subsequent research.
  • Design-around patents that competitors might pursue to develop similar drugs avoiding ES3017701’s claims.
  • Patent expiry considerations, which influence market exclusivity and generic entry timelines (typically 20 years from filing).

Patent Challenges and Legal Status

Potential legal challenges could involve:

  • Oppositions during grant proceedings or post-grant review.
  • Litigation regarding patent validity or infringement.
  • Patent term extensions or SPCs depending on the innovative contribution and supplementary protection mechanisms available in Spain and Europe.

Implications for Stakeholders

Innovators and Patent Holders

A robust patent like ES3017701 serves as a key asset, providing market exclusivity and a competitive moat. Clear claims delineate the boundaries of enforcement, and understanding the landscape informs licensing and collaboration strategies.

Generic Manufacturers

Inexpensive generics become viable upon patent expiration. The scope and validity of ES3017701 impact their entry timing and R&D planning. They may attempt to design around narrow claims or challenge the patent’s validity via legal proceedings.

Legal and Regulatory Environment

Continuous monitoring of patent oppositions, third-party filings, and regulatory filings is vital for strategic planning. The intersection of patent law with regulatory exclusivity periods creates a complex competitive landscape.


Conclusion

Patent ES3017701 epitomizes a strategic pharmaceutical patent designed to safeguard a novel drug entity or formulation within Spain and potentially in broader European markets. Its legal scope, articulated through carefully drafted claims, aims to preclude unauthorized copying or development of similar compounds. The patent landscape around this patent is characterized by overlapping rights, potential challenges, and the overarching goal of maintaining market exclusivity.

Understanding the specific language of claims and their scope is critical for stakeholders to assess infringement risks, freedom-to-operate, and licensing opportunities. Moreover, the evolving patent environment, including oppositions, legal disputes, and expiry dates, influences the commercial strategy for the patent holder.


Key Takeaways

  • The strength and breadth of ES3017701 hinge on claim drafting, with broad claims offering extensive protection but facing higher invalidity risks.
  • The patent landscape includes related patents, potential for extension through patent families, and strategic considerations regarding competing rights.
  • Patents like ES3017701 provide a competitive edge, but stakeholders must monitor legal statuses, expiry dates, and potential oppositions.
  • Effective patent management involves aligning claim scope with product development, navigating European harmonization, and preparing for challenges.
  • A comprehensive understanding of patent claims and landscape is essential for informed decision-making in drug development, licensing, and commercialization.

FAQs

1. What is the typical duration of a pharmaceutical patent like ES3017701 in Spain?
Pharmaceutical patents generally grant protection for 20 years from the filing date, with potential extensions via Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) for certain drugs, prolonging exclusivity up to 15 years beyond patent expiry.

2. How can generic manufacturers challenge the validity of ES3017701?
They can file oppositions or nullity actions based on prior art, lack of novelty, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure, often during the patent’s grant or renewal period.

3. What strategies can patent holders employ to extend the commercial lifespan of ES3017701?
Beyond enforcing the patent, holders typically pursue SPCs, develop new formulations or indications, or file for additional patents covering derivatives and manufacturing processes.

4. How does the scope of claims impact infringement litigation?
Broader claims increase the likelihood of infringement detection but may be more vulnerable to invalidation. Narrow claims offer specificity but may allow competitors to circumvent protections more easily.

5. Can ES3017701 be enforced outside Spain?
Yes, if filed within a patent family covering other jurisdictions (e.g., through the EPO or direct national filings), protection can be extended to European countries and beyond.


References
[1] European Patent Office (EPO) Public Patent Database.
[2] Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (OEPM).
[3] European Patent Convention (EPC).
[4] Patent prosecution and litigation reports relevant to pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.