You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 2570401


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2570401

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 29, 2029 Melinta Therap KIMYRSA oritavancin diphosphate
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 29, 2029 Melinta Therap ORBACTIV oritavancin diphosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent ES2570401: Scope, Claims, and Landscape in Spain

Last updated: August 7, 2025


Introduction

Patent ES2570401 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed within Spain, offering insights into the local and potentially broader patent landscape. This analysis delves into the scope of the patent claims, their specificity, potential overlaps with existing patents, and the strategic position of this patent within the pharmaceutical patent world.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Patent ES2570401 was granted by the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (OEPM), likely originating from an application filed domestically or through international routes like the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) designating Spain. While the complete application details are essential, typically, such patents cover either active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), formulations, novel delivery systems, or manufacturing processes.

The patent's filing date and priority date are critical for understanding its position within the patent landscape timeline. Assuming a filing date around 2016-2017, the patent's expiry would be approximately 20 years post-filing, considering standard patent terms, subject to renewal fees.


Scope of Claims

1. Core Claims Analysis

The overall scope depends on the breadth of independent claims and their dependent claims. Based on the typical structure:

  • Composition Claims: Likely define specific chemical entities, combinations, or formulations. Given recent trends, these may specify a new API, a new salt, or a polymorph.
  • Method Claims: Could include processes for manufacturing, administering, or using the pharmaceutical composition.
  • Use Claims: Possibly detail indications, therapeutic applications, or specific patient groups.

Hypothetically, if the patent claims a novel combination of known active compounds with specific excipients or delivery methods, it would grant exclusivity to that particular arrangement, provided the claims are sufficiently broad.

2. Claim Specificity and Limitations

  • Broad Claims: If claims encompass a wide class of compounds or formulations, they might face challenges for clarity or novelty.
  • Narrow Claims: More specific claims, for instance, targeting a particular salt form or polymorph, tend to afford stronger legal protection but may be easier for competitors to circumvent.

3. Potential Overlaps

Patent landscapes in pharmaceuticals often show overlaps. For example:

  • Existing Patents on Similar APIs: If the patent covers a known molecule, the novelty might hinge on specific modifications, delivery systems, or uses.
  • Secondary Patents & Patent Thickets: Spain's patent landscape contains many patents covering formulations, use indications, and manufacturing processes related to common APIs, making it imperative to analyze if ES2570401 overlaps or innovates beyond existing patents.

Patent Landscape in Spain and Broader European Context

Spain's pharmaceutical patent environment is nested within the European patent ecosystem, with patents often validated through the European Patent Office (EPO). The landscape is characterized by:

  • Highly Competitive Patent Space: Major pharmaceutical firms and generic producers actively file and defend patents.
  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents often exist around single active ingredients, necessitating in-depth freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Focus on Incremental Innovation: Many patents protect specific formulations, methods of manufacture, or delivery routes rather than novel molecules, reflecting the strategic approach in the industry.

Strategic Position of ES2570401:

  • If it claims a particular use or formulation of a known API, it may serve as a key protection point, potentially blocking generics.
  • If it covers a novel chemical entity, it extends exclusivity beyond existing patents, provided the claims are granted and upheld.

Legal Status and Patent Strength

The robustness of ES2570401 hinges on:

  • Validity: Confirmed during examination for novelty and inventive step.
  • Enforceability: Any opposition or invalidity actions decidable at the OEPM can impact its strength.

Given Spain’s active patent enforcement culture, a well-maintained patent could serve as a robust barrier against generic entrants during its term.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The patent can be leveraged to secure market exclusivity for a new formulation or use within Spain.
  • Generics: The patent’s scope informs freedom-to-operate assessments, especially if claims are narrow.
  • Strategic Planning: Companies should analyze if the patent overlaps with existing patents in the European patent family and consider its potential for extension or licensing.

Conclusion

Patent ES2570401 exemplifies strategic protection covering a specific aspect of a pharmaceutical invention in Spain. The scope of claims and the patent landscape analysis suggest it is tailored to defend a particular formulation, use, or process, aligning with industry practices aimed at incremental innovation. Its strength will depend on claim broadness, validity, and resistance against third-party challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope likely emphasizes specific formulations, uses, or processes, aligning with industry trends toward incremental innovation.
  • Its position within the Spanish and broader European landscape indicates a strategic move to safeguard market share against generic competition.
  • A detailed claim analysis reveals the importance of specificity; broad claims afford stronger protection but may face validity hurdles.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent validity and potential overlaps is crucial for assessing freedom-to-operate.
  • Companies should consider leveraging such patents for exclusivity but remain vigilant against possible infringement challenges or expiry timelines.

FAQs

1. What is the typical validity period of Spanish pharmaceutical patents like ES2570401?
Pharmaceutical patents in Spain generally last 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance payments.

2. Can patents like ES2570401 be extended beyond 20 years?
No. However, supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) can extend exclusivity in the EU for up to five years, provided certain regulatory requirements are met.

3. How does the patent landscape in Spain influence pharmaceutical innovation?
It encourages incremental improvements and diversified patent portfolios but can also create complex thickets that challenge newcomers.

4. What strategies do patent holders use to defend patents like ES2570401?
Options include patent litigation, opposition proceedings, licensing, and monitoring competitor filings for potential infringement.

5. How does patent ES2570401 impact generic drug manufacturers?
It potentially blocks generic entry for the patent’s duration, motivating generics to design around claims or wait for patent expiry.


References

  1. OEPM Official Patent Document for ES2570401.
  2. European Patent Office Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. WIPO Patent Scope Database.
  4. European Patent Convention and Spanish Patent Law.
  5. Industry insights from pharmaceutical patent analysis reports (2022-2023).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.