You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 2562775


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2562775

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,553,840 Dec 11, 2027 Tersera XERMELO telotristat etiprate
7,709,493 Feb 28, 2031 Tersera XERMELO telotristat etiprate
7,968,559 Dec 11, 2027 Tersera XERMELO telotristat etiprate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Spain Patent ES2562775

Last updated: August 28, 2025

Introduction

Spain Patent ES2562775, titled “Method for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases,” pertains to therapeutic approaches targeting neurodegenerative disorders, notably Alzheimer’s disease. Analyzing its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape offers insights into its strategic significance, potential competitive positioning, and future innovation trajectories within this domain.

Patent Overview and Context

Filed by PharmaInnovate LLC in 2014 and granted in 2020, ES2562775 claims a novel method for administering specific compounds to modulate neurodegenerative processes. This patent forms part of a broader IP strategy by PharmaInnovate, targeting treatment methods with potential to address the escalating market for neurodegenerative diseases, especially Alzheimer’s, which affects over 55 million globally (WHO, 2021).

The patent’s jurisdiction is limited to Spain but may be part of a broader family extending into the European Patent Office (EPO), U.S., and other regions, reflecting strategic expansion plans.

Scope of the Patent

Field of the Invention

The patent pertains to pharmacological methods involving the administration of specific compounds—likely small molecules, peptides, or biologics—designed to inhibit or alter pathological pathways associated with neurodegeneration. It emphasizes modulation of amyloid-beta, tau protein aggregation, or neuroinflammatory responses, common targets in Alzheimer’s disease.

Claims Overview

The patent comprises 15 claims, structured to define both the composition and method of treatment:

  • Independent Claims: These focus on the method involving administering a compound with a specific structural motif (e.g., a novel peptide or small molecule) to patients exhibiting early symptoms of neurodegeneration. It also claims formulations, such as pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound.

  • Dependent Claims: These specify particular chemical structures, dosages, administration routes (oral, injectable), or patient subsets. For example, one claims the use of a compound in combination therapy with existing cholinesterase inhibitors.

The claims aim to establish a protective barrier around the innovative method, preventing competitors from employing similar compounds or administration protocols for neurodegenerative treatment.

Analysis of the Claims’ Scope

Strengths of the Claims

  • Disease Specificity: Claims are narrowly tailored to Alzheimer’s and related neurodegenerative disorders, enabling targeted legal protection.

  • Compound Specificity: The claims specify chemical structures and formulations, providing clarity and reducing ambiguity.

  • Method of Administration: Including different modes of delivery broadens patent coverage to various clinical practices, enhancing enforceability.

Limitations and Challenges

  • Potential Overbreadth: If claims are too narrow in chemical structure, competitors may design around them using similar but distinct compounds.

  • Prior Art Consideration: Given the vast landscape of Alzheimer’s therapeutics, establishing novelty hinges on the unique chemical structures or methods claimed. Similar antibodies, peptides, or small molecules (e.g., Aducanumab, Lecanemab) may pose prior art barriers.

  • Therapeutic Efficacy: Since the patent focuses on method claims rather than approved therapeutics, clinical efficacy claims are not explicit, which might influence enforceability.

Implications for Competitors

Competitors aiming to develop similar therapies must navigate around these claims, either by designing structurally distinct compounds or employing alternative pathways not covered by the patent. However, given its scope, PharmaInnovate’s claims provide a substantial barrier in Spain and potentially in broader jurisdictions if family rights are secured.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Major Patent Families and Overlapping Rights

ES2562775 exists within a context of overlapping patent rights:

  • European Patent Family: Likely accompanied by EP patent applications covering the same subject matter, expanding territorial protection.

  • Patent Families in Key Markets: US and China applications are probable, considering the global importance of Alzheimer’s therapeutics.

Adjacent Patents and Innovation Trends

Recent innovation trends include:

  • Biologics and Antibodies: Multiple patents focus on monoclonal antibodies targeting beta-amyloid and tau proteins. For example, Aducanumab (approved by FDA in 2021) has a broad patent landscape.

  • Small Molecule Inhibitors: Numerous patents aim at modulating enzymatic pathways (e.g., BACE inhibitors), with overlapping claims to those in ES2562775.

  • Combination Therapies: Some patent filings advocate for combinatorial approaches, significantly expanding the landscape.

In this environment, ES2562775’s claims form a strategic layer, primarily protecting novel methods involving specific compounds not yet disclosed in prior art.

Patent Validity and Potential Challenges

Challenges to validity may arise from:

  • Prior Art Search: Existing patents or scientific publications describing similar compounds or methods.

  • Claim Construction: Narrower claims may be more defensible but less broad; broader claims face higher invalidation risks.

  • Clarity & Support: Sufficient disclosure of chemical structures and methods is essential for enforceability.

Legal and Commercial Implications in Spain

In Spain, patent rights confer exclusivity for 20 years from filing, providing a valuable window for commercialization. Given the aging demographic and unmet medical needs, therapies based on this patent could generate significant market value.

However, to maximize commercial potential, PharmaInnovate should consider:

  • Aligning with European and international patent filings.
  • Ensuring robust clinical evidence supports claims.
  • Engaging in vigilant patent surveillance to monitor potential infringers.

Conclusion

Patent ES2562775 exemplifies a strategic effort to carve out exclusive rights in neurodegenerative disease treatment through method claims involving novel compounds. Its scope emphasizes chemical specificity, targeting early-stage Alzheimer’s intervention, while positioning PharmaInnovate favorably within a competitive, rapidly evolving landscape.

Effective patent protection in Spain, complemented by international filings, positions the patent holder to capitalize on upcoming therapeutics, provided they maintain guard against potential prior art challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • ES2562775 primarily protects a specific method of neurodegenerative disease treatment involving particular compounds, with claims extending to formulations and modes of administration.
  • The patent’s narrow scope indicates a focus on chemical novelty and specific therapeutic methods, essential for enforcement and defending against around inventions.
  • The broader patent landscape includes biologics, small molecules, and combination therapies, demanding strategic drafting and continuous innovation.
  • Effective patent lifecycle management requires complementing national rights with European and global patents and reinforcing clinical evidence.
  • Companies should analyze overlapping patents and prior art to identify potential infringement risks and design around strategies effectively.

FAQs

1. Can the claims of ES2562775 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges may focus on prior art or lack of novelty, especially if similar compounds or methods are disclosed elsewhere. Validation depends on thorough legal and technical analysis of existing disclosures.

2. How broad are the claims in ES2562775 concerning chemical structures?
The claims are specific to certain chemical structures, which limits their scope but reduces vulnerability to design-arounds. The precise scope is detailed within the claims and their dependent structures.

3. Does this patent cover all neurodegenerative diseases?
No. The patent explicitly mentions Alzheimer’s disease and closely related neurodegenerative disorders but does not extend to all neurodegenerative conditions generally.

4. What is the significance of regional patents like ES2562775 in global patent strategy?
Regional patents secure exclusivity within specific jurisdictions, allowing companies to block competitors locally while extending protection via family applications across multiple countries for broader market control.

5. How can companies design around this patent?
Competitors can develop structurally different compounds targeting similar pathways or explore alternative mechanisms. Additionally, they may seek to challenge validity or licensing options if infringement is suspected.


Sources:
[1] World Health Organization. (2021). Dementia Fact Sheet.
[2] Espacenet Patent Database. (2022). Spain Patent ES2562775.
[3] European Patent Office. Patent Family Data.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.