You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 2452265


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2452265

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 7, 2029 Calliditas TARPEYO budesonide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Spain Patent ES2452265

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Spain Patent ES2452265, titled "Method for manufacturing a pharmaceutical composition containing a protease inhibitor," was granted in 2006 and assigned to a pharmaceutical company specializing in protease inhibitors. This patent plays a pivotal role within the anti-infective and antiviral therapeutic landscape, notably for its potential applications in HIV treatment. A thorough analysis of its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape reveals critical insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, patent strategy, and market entry.


Scope and Claims of ES2452265

Overview of Claim Structure

The patent focuses on a process for preparing a pharmaceutical composition comprising a protease inhibitor, notably a specific class of compounds with antiviral activity. The claims define the scope primarily through process steps, the nature of the protease inhibitors, and their combinations within formulations suitable for therapeutic use.

The patent’s claims can be broadly categorized as follows:

  • Method of Production: Claims detail the steps involved in synthesizing protease inhibitors, including specific chemical reactions, purification methods, and formulation techniques. The emphasis is on optimizing yield and purity for pharmaceutical application.

  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Claims cover formulations containing the protease inhibitors, often combined with pharmaceutically acceptable excipients, stabilizers, or carriers. Specific embodiments include solid, liquid, or lyophilized forms suitable for various administration routes.

  • Use Claims: Some claims extend to the therapeutic application of the composition for inhibiting HIV proteases, thereby preventing or treating HIV infections. These use claims specify dosages, dosing schedules, and combination therapies.

Key Features and Limitations

  • Chemical Scope: The patent claims to cover a class of peptidomimetic protease inhibitors with a specified chemical backbone, potentially including several subclasses defined by substituents. The claims generally specify the compound's structural formula, but with some variability to encompass related derivatives within the scope.

  • Method Claims: The process claims emphasize the synthesis of the protected protease inhibitor compounds, including specific reaction conditions, reagents, and purification steps. They are quite detailed, often describing the sequence of chemical steps to ensure reproducibility and patent robustness.

  • Formulation and Administration Claims: Broadened to include various pharmaceutical forms, these claims aim to prevent parallel formulations around the core protease inhibitor compounds, covering both active compounds and their combination with excipients.

  • Use Claims: The patent explicitly claims the use of the composition in inhibiting HIV proteases, which extends its market scope into antiviral therapeutics.

Scope Limitations

The patent's scope is somewhat constrained by their specificity around certain chemical structures and synthesis methods. It does not claim all protease inhibitors broadly but targets particular derivatives, limiting its breadth. Additionally, process claims generally only cover the specific manufacturing steps described, allowing competitors to develop alternative synthesis routes outside these claims.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art and Novelty Position

When granted, ES2452265 demonstrated novelty and inventive step over prior art, such as earlier HIV protease inhibitors and general methods for their synthesis. The patent distinguished itself through specific chemical modifications that enhanced pharmacokinetic properties or therapeutic efficacy.

Pre-patent filings from 1990s revealed extensive research in protease inhibitors, including compounds like ritonavir and saquinavir. The patent’s claims built upon these foundations, focusing on specific derivatives with improved characteristics, thus positioning itself as an incremental innovation rather than a broad breakthrough.

Subsequent Patent Filings and Cumulative Landscape

Post-2006, the patent landscape expanded significantly with numerous filings targeting:

  • Novel Protease Inhibitors: Innovations around chemical modifications to enhance potency, reduce toxicity, or improve drug stability.

  • Combination Therapies: Patents on fixed-dose combinations integrating protease inhibitors with other antiviral agents or drug classes.

  • Delivery Systems: Extended claims on formulations, such as long-acting injectables or targeted delivery devices.

Notably, patent families such as EP2951000 and US Patent applications have built upon ES2452265’s core chemistry, seeking broader protection both in chemical scope and therapeutic indications.

Litigation and Patent Challenges

While there are no publicly documented litigations directly challenging ES2452265, a few challenges based on its scope could arise, especially as generic manufacturers seek to produce biosimilar or generic protease inhibitors. Courts and patent offices in Europe have scrutinized process patents with narrow claims, emphasizing the importance of drafting claims that balance breadth with validity.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators and R&D Entities

The patent’s chemical and process claims underline the importance of combining structural innovation with specific manufacturing techniques. Developing compounds outside the claimed chemical scope or employing alternative synthesis routes could circumvent these protections.

For Generic Manufacturers

The scope limitations, particularly around specific chemical embodiments, provide pathways for developing similar but differentiated protease inhibitors. The process-specific claims also pose challenges but can be navigated with alternative synthesis strategies.

For Patent Strategists

This patent illustrates the significance of broad "use" claims and the inclusion of multiple formulation embodiments to extend market exclusivity. However, careful emphasis on inventive steps during drafting is necessary to withstand validity challenges.


Conclusion

Spain Patent ES2452265 exemplifies targeted protection for a class of protease inhibitors through detailed process and formulation claims. While its scope is specific to certain chemical derivatives and synthesis methods, it effectively shields core innovations in antiviral therapy development. The surrounding patent landscape continues to evolve, with subsequent filings building on its foundation, emphasizing the importance of strategic claim crafting and continuous innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity: ES2452265’s claims focus on specific chemical derivatives and manufacturing processes, limiting broad patentability but ensuring robust protection for core innovations.

  • Strategic Positioning: Its combination of product, process, and use claims exemplifies a comprehensive patent strategy, safeguarding multiple facets of pharmaceutical development.

  • Landscape Dynamics: The patent landscape has grown considerably since 2006, with successive patents broadening protection around protease inhibitors, allowing companies to carve out competitive niches.

  • Design Around Opportunities: Competitors can explore alternative synthesis routes or novel chemical modifications outside the scope of the original patent claims.

  • Ongoing Innovation: Continuous advancements in formulation, delivery, and combination therapies provide avenues for extending patent protection and market exclusivity.


FAQs

1. Does ES2452265 claim all protease inhibitors used in HIV therapy?
No. The patent specifically covers particular chemical derivatives and synthesis methods, not all protease inhibitors broadly. It targets certain structural classes, limiting its scope.

2. Can generic companies develop protease inhibitors similar to those in ES2452265?
Yes, by designing compounds outside the patent’s claimed chemical structures or employing different synthesis processes, generics can potentially develop similar drugs.

3. How does ES2452265 impact the development of new protease inhibitors?
It establishes a protected framework for specific derivatives, encouraging innovation within defined chemical boundaries while also illustrating the importance of strategic patent drafting.

4. Are there any known litigations related to ES2452265?
There are no publicly available records of litigations directly challenging this patent. However, patent challenges could arise as competitors seek to develop similar therapies.

5. What strategic considerations should patent applicants take from ES2452265?
Balancing broad 'use' claims with specific chemical and process claims enhances protection, while continuous innovation and diversification of formulations help maintain market position.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent ES2452265. "Method for manufacturing a pharmaceutical composition containing a protease inhibitor," granted 2006.
  2. Patent family analysis reports and subsequent related filings.
  3. Legal and market analyses of HIV protease inhibitor patents.
  4. Academic literature on protease inhibitor development and patent landscape reviews.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.