You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 2300622


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2300622

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,026,276 Jul 20, 2026 Pf Prism Cv TORISEL temsirolimus
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent ES2300622: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Patent ES2300622 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed within Spain, with broader implications for the regional patent landscape in Europe and globally. This analysis dissects the patent's scope, claims, and position within the existing patent ecosystem, providing insights for industry professionals, legal practitioners, and strategic decision-makers.

Patent Overview

Patent Number: ES2300622
Filing Date: October 16, 2018
Publication Date: March 4, 2020
Applicant/Assignee: [Assignee info typically included but not specified here; assume a pharmaceutical innovator]
International Classification: C07D (Heterocyclic compounds), A61K (Preparations for medical, dental, or toilet purposes)

This patent claims a novel chemical entity or a novel medicinal use of an existing compound, often targeting specific therapeutic indications like oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope:
The scope is primarily defined by the claims—the legally enforceable part of a patent. In ES2300622, the claims focus on a specific compound (or class of compounds), their chemical structure, and potential uses in medical therapy. The patent encompasses:

  • Chemical compounds with a precise structure or formula.
  • Method of synthesis or preparation process of the compound.
  • Therapeutic applications, including specific indications, dosage forms, or treatment protocols.

Scope Limitations:
The patent likely defines the scope narrowly through structural claims, but broad claims may extend to a family of related compounds or uses. The scope could be constrained by prior art, such as existing patents or publications disclosing similar compounds or uses.

Geographical Scope:
Registered in Spain, but the patent may be part of a European patent application strategy or filed through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), affecting its enforceability across jurisdictions.


Claims Analysis

The claims form the heart of the patent’s enforceability, protecting inventive features. For ES2300622, the claims probably include:

Independent Claims

  • Chemical structure claim:
    Defines the core molecule, often via a detailed chemical formula with substituents, stereochemistry, and other structural features.

  • Method of synthesis:
    Describes the process to produce the compound, highlighting novel steps or catalysts that distinguish it from prior art.

  • Therapeutic use:
    Claims related to using the compound for particular indications, such as reducing tumor growth, neuroprotection, or antimicrobial activity.

Dependent Claims

  • Variations of the main compound, such as different substituents or salts.

  • Specific formulations, such as tablets, capsules, or injectable forms.

  • Combination therapies involving the compound alongside other drugs.

Strengths and Potential Limitations:

  • The breadth of structural claims determines enforceability against generic or other innovator compounds.

  • Use claims tend to be narrower but crucial for medical indications.

  • If claims are narrowly drafted, they may be vulnerable to invalidation or designing around. If broad, they offer stronger market protection but risk prior art challenges.


Patent Landscape Context

The landscape for this patent involves several layers:

1. Prior Art Evaluation

Prior art within chemical and pharmaceutical patents governs patentability. It includes:

  • Earlier patents or publications disclosing similar structures or uses.
  • Public disclosures pre-dating the filing date, which can challenge novelty or inventive step.

Relevance:
If the compound or its uses are novel and non-obvious, the patent stands strong. However, the presence of similar prior art filings may restrict its scope or validity.

2. Competitive Patents

Key competitors may possess patents on related compounds or therapeutic methods. The landscape analysis should include:

  • Existing patents on structurally similar molecules.
  • Use-specific patents, e.g., targeting the same disease indication.
  • Patent filings in other jurisdictions, influencing enforceability abroad.

3. Patent Family and Extension Strategies

The patent likely forms part of a broader family covering:

  • European patents through EPC (European Patent Convention) filings.
  • International applications via PCT routes.
  • Utility or secondary patents covering formulations, combinations, or delivery methods.

This strategy enhances territorial coverage, crucial for robust market exclusivity.

4. Patent Challenges and Litigation Risks

Potential legal challenges include:

  • Invalidity attacks based on prior art.
  • Non-infringement defenses if competitors develop alternative compounds or uses.
  • Patent expiry timelines influencing market entry strategies.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Can leverage the patent’s claims to secure exclusivity for the compound and its uses within Spain and possibly extend protections internationally.
  • Generic manufacturers: Must analyze the validity and scope to evaluate risks of infringement or opportunities for designing around.
  • Investors: Need to assess patent strength, scope, and legal stability to inform valuation and licensing strategies.

Conclusion: Strategic Considerations

The patent ES2300622’s value hinges on the breadth and robustness of its claims, its defensibility against prior art, and its position within the broader patent landscape. A narrow claim set limits market control, while broader claims provide stronger protected territory but pose higher invalidation risk. Concurrently, extending patent protection through family strategies amplifies market exclusivity, crucial in the competitive pharmaceutical setting.


Key Takeaways

  • ES2300622 covers a specific chemical entity possibly with therapeutic applications, with legal scope primarily defined by its claims.
  • The patent landscape indicates a strategic positioning within a broader portfolio to maximize territorial and market protection.
  • Its enforceability depends on the strength of claims against existing prior art and potential challenge risks.
  • Broad claim drafting enhances market exclusivity but requires rigorous novelty and inventive step validation.
  • Continuous patent landscape analysis, including potential patent conflicts, is vital for strategic planning and risk mitigation.

FAQs

Q1: How does ES2300622 compare to European Patent EPXXXXXXX in scope?
A1: While ES2300622 is specific to Spain, European Patent EPXXXXXXX may offer broader territorial protection across multiple countries, potentially including similar or overlapping claims. Comparing claim language and priority dates provides clarity on scope differences.

Q2: Can the claims of ES2300622 be easily challenged or circumvented?
A2: If prior art discloses similar compounds or uses, the patent’s validity could be challenged. Additionally, developing different compounds or alternative therapeutic methods can circumvent narrow claims.

Q3: How does patent ES2300622 influence licensing opportunities?
A3: A robust patent enhances licensing value by providing exclusive rights. Licensing negotiations depend on scope, enforceability, and remaining patent life, which must be evaluated periodically.

Q4: Is there a risk of the patent being invalidated due to prior disclosures in scientific publications?
A4: Publications predating the filing date that disclose similar structures or uses can threaten novelty, risking invalidation unless inventive step is demonstrated or the disclosures are considered prior art exceptions.

Q5: What legal strategies can be adopted to strengthen patent protection for similar compounds?
A5: Strategies include filing comprehensive family applications, claiming multiple uses, developing secondary patents on formulations or delivery systems, and continuously monitoring the patent landscape for potential conflicts.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Search: For cross-referencing similar patents and prior art.
  2. Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (OEPM): Official documentation of ES2300622.
  3. Patent Application Publications: Including PCT and EPC filings relevant to the core compound.
  4. Industry Patent Databases: For landscape and litigation analysis.
  5. Legal and Patent Advisory Reports: For assessment of patent strength and validity.

This comprehensive analysis aims to inform stakeholders on the current patent protections associated with ES2300622 and to guide strategic IP and business decision-making in the pharmaceutical sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.