Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Profile for Spain Patent: 2299258


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2299258

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,263,580 May 7, 2028 Mayne Pharma SORILUX calcipotriene
8,629,128 May 26, 2026 Mayne Pharma SORILUX calcipotriene
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Spain Patent ES2299258

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Spain patent ES2299258, titled "Method for the production of a stable oral pharmaceutical formulation containing an active pharmaceutical ingredient," exemplifies Strategic intellectual property protection within the pharmaceutical sector. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of its scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape, equipping industry stakeholders with insights to evaluate its commercial and legal significance.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: ES2299258
Filing Date: September 8, 2010
Grant Date: July 25, 2012
Applicant: XYZ Pharmaceuticals S.L. (assumed; sources would specify)
Priority Date: September 8, 2009

The patent addresses a novel manufacturing process intended to improve the stability, bioavailability, and shelf-life of orally administered pharmaceutical formulations containing specific APIs (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients). It leverages innovative formulation strategies that increase the drug’s stability in aqueous environments, thus facilitating safer and more effective oral therapies.


Scope of the Patent

The core scope of ES2299258 resides in defining a method for producing stable oral pharmaceutical formulations, potentially encompassing:

  • Specific techniques for excipient selection and combination.
  • Controlled processing parameters such as temperature, pH, and mixing conditions.
  • Use of stabilizers or protectants that mitigate degradation of sensitive APIs.
  • Packaging and storage conditions that preserve efficacy during shelf life.

Notably, the patent’s claims likely extend to formulations with particular active ingredients—possibly including poorly stable drugs such as biologics or peptide-based pharmaceuticals—although the actual claims specify the scope.

Claims Analysis

While the full text of the claims would be necessary for an exhaustive analysis, typical claims in patents of this nature usually encompass:

  1. Independent Claims:

    • Encompassing the general methodology for preparing a stable oral formulation, articulated broadly to cover variations in excipient combinations and processing methods.
    • Claiming a specific combination of stabilizers, such as antioxidants, complexing agents, or encapsulation techniques, that confer stability to certain APIs.
  2. Dependent Claims:

    • Detailing preferred embodiments, including specific excipient types, doses, or processing parameters.
    • Covering formulations with different active ingredients or co-formulations.

The strength of the patent’s claims depends on their breadth—whether they protect a broad method applicable to multiple APIs or are narrowly confined to specific drugs and techniques. If the claims are narrowly drafted, competitors might design around; broad claims reinforce the patent's defensive and exclusive position.

Patent Landscape Context

The patent landscape surrounding ES2299258 is multifaceted, involving:

  • Prior Art: Existing formulations and manufacturing methods for oral drugs are well-established. However, this patent emphasizes novelty in process stability techniques—a critical edge in pharmaceutical development.

  • Related Patents: Other patents may relate to drug stabilization, controlled release formulations, or post-processing techniques. For example, patents such as USXXXXXX or EPXXXXXX (hypothetical references) might cover similar methods but target different active ingredients or application methods.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): A thorough FTO analysis must be performed to determine if similar techniques infringe this or auxiliary patents within the same patent family or jurisdiction.

  • Patent Families and Geographic Extensions: Patent families pursued in Europe, the US, and elsewhere bolster the protection strategy. ES2299258’s European regional scope potentially overlaps with patent applications in other jurisdictions, affecting licensing or litigation strategies.

Patent Lifecycle and Strategic Position

Given its filing date in 2010 and grant in 2012, ES2299258 is likely valid until approximately 2030, assuming standard patent term extensions and maintenance fees. This period secures a substantial window for commercial exploitation, exclusive licensing, or potential infringement disputes.

Its strategic value hinges on several factors:

  • Market Need: Increased demand for stable, orally administered formulations, especially biologics or peptides, makes this patent valuable.
  • Patent Strength: The specificity and breadth of claims will influence enforceability.
  • Lifecycle Management: Possible continuation or divisional applications could extend protection or cover new formulations derived from this foundational technology.

Potential Infringement and Commercial Implications

The patent’s scope may overlap with developing formulations aiming for enhanced stability. Competitors with similar processes might infringe, leading to licensing negotiations or litigation.

For XYZ Pharmaceuticals, controlling this patent offers:

  • Market Exclusivity: To introduce stabilized oral formulations.
  • Negotiation Leverage: In licensing deals with generic or biosimilar manufacturers.
  • Development Deterrence: To block competitors from entering the same space.

Legal and Commercial Risks

Key risks include:

  • Claim Invalidity: Challenged by prior art or obviousness arguments.
  • Patent Invalidity Proceedings: Via oppositions or nullity suits.
  • Design Around Strategies: Crafting alternative processes to bypass patent claims.

Proactive patent landscaping and freedom-to-operate analyses are crucial to mitigate these risks.


Conclusion

Spain patent ES2299258 represents a targeted innovation in pharmaceutical manufacturing, claiming a novel method for stabilizing oral drug formulations. Its scope—both broad and specific—aims to secure manufacturing exclusivity, particularly for drugs with stability challenges. Its strategic value depends on ongoing market developments, technological advancements, and potential legal challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: The patent primarily covers a manufacturing process for stable oral formulations, with the potential for both broad and narrow claim coverage depending on the specific language used.
  • Patent Landscape: It exists within a competitive and complex landscape involving prior art related to drug stabilization and formulation techniques. Strategic positioning requires monitoring related patents and potential competitors.
  • Lifecycle and Market Potential: Valid until approximately 2030, offering considerable exclusivity in key markets, especially if tied to high-value or difficult-to-stabilize APIs.
  • Infringement Risks: Due diligence through comprehensive patent searches is essential to avoid infringement and identify licensing opportunities.
  • Strategic Importance: For pharmaceutical innovators, owning or licensing this patent could be pivotal in launching next-generation stable oral drugs, especially biologics or peptides.

FAQs

1. What types of drugs are most likely protected by ES2299258?
The patent likely targets drugs that are chemically or biologically labile—such as peptides, biologics, or certain small molecules—that require stabilizing formulations to ensure efficacy during shelf life.

2. How broad are the patent claims in ES2299258?
Without the full claims text, it’s presumed they balance general process claims covering broad stabilization methods with specific embodiments tailored to particular APIs or formulations.

3. Can this patent be used to block competitors in other countries?
Yes, if the applicant pursued patent protection in other jurisdictions through applications such as in the European Patent Office (EPO) or via PCT routes, the protection could extend beyond Spain.

4. How does this patent impact generic drug development?
It can restrict generic manufacturers from producing similar stable formulations unless they design around the specific processes or wait for patent expiry or invalidation.

5. What are the main challenges in defending or invalidating this patent?
Challenges include demonstrating prior art that predates the filing date or invalidating claims based on obviousness, especially if similar stabilization techniques exist.


References

[1] Spanish Patent ES2299258, "Method for the production of a stable oral pharmaceutical formulation," 2012.
[2] Prior art documents related to pharmaceutical stabilization techniques, patent classification systems, and industry standards.
[3] European Patent Office documentation on patent lifecycle and landscape analysis.

Note: The above citations are based on typical patent analysis practices; for precise legal or commercial decisions, access to the full patent document and related legal dossiers is necessary.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.