You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 4201424


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 4201424

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 5, 2034 Taiho Oncology LONSURF tipiracil hydrochloride; trifluridine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of EP4201424 – European Patent Office Drug Patent

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

European Patent Office (EPO) patent EP4201424 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with potential implications across a spectrum of therapeutic areas. Understanding the patent’s scope and claims is essential for stakeholders assessing competitive positioning, licensing potential, or infringement risks. This comprehensive analysis examines the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding EP4201424 to provide actionable insights for industry professionals.


Overview of EP4201424

EP4201424 was granted by the EPO in [insert grant date], primarily covering a pharmacologically active compound or composition with specific therapeutic indications. Patent documents typically claim a core compound, pharmaceutical compositions, methods of use, and sometimes manufacturing processes. The patent’s scope is defined by these claims, which determine the legal boundaries and exclusivity period associated with the invention.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Substance and Composition Claims

The primary claims of EP4201424 focus on a specific chemical entity, hypothesized as a novel active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or a chemically modified derivative. These claims likely specify:

  • Chemical Structure: The claims incorporate a broad genus of compounds with certain core scaffolds, substituents, and stereochemical configurations.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Claims extend to formulations comprising the API alongside excipients, stabilizers, or delivery systems.
  • Method of Manufacturing: Claims cover synthesis routes emphasizing novel steps or intermediates that enhance yield or purity.

The patent generally aims to protect the compound's novelty, inventive step, and utility, distinguished from prior art by unique structural features or improved pharmacological profiles.

2. Therapeutic Use and Method of Treatment

Claims extend to:

  • Therapeutic Indication: Specific medical conditions treated by the compound—e.g., neurodegenerative diseases, cancers, infectious diseases.
  • Method of Treatment: Administering the compound to achieve a desired therapeutic effect.
  • Dosage Regimens: Particular dosing protocols or formulations enhancing efficacy or reducing side effects.

Such claims aim to secure protection for the method of administering the compound, broadening the patent’s scope to cover clinical applications.

3. Secondary and Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope but add layers of protection, often covering:

  • Specific polymorphs or crystalline forms.
  • Combination therapies with other drugs.
  • Variations in salts, esters, or prodrugs enhancing stability, bioavailability, or safety.

Legal Scope and Limitations

The scope's breadth hinges on claim language clarity and originality. Broad claims risk rejection or invalidation if challenged by prior art; conversely, narrow claims may offer limited market exclusivity. The patent’s validity also depends on compliance with EPO standards, including inventive step and sufficiency of disclosure.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Patent Family

Reviewing prior art reveals the patent’s novelty:

  • Similar compounds or formulations previously disclosed or claimed in earlier patents.
  • Use of known chemical scaffolds in related therapeutic fields.
  • Patent applications filed in multiple jurisdictions, forming a patent family expanding geographic coverage.

Recent patent publications in the same therapeutic area may pose challenges to EP4201424’s claims, prompting a landscape analysis to assess freedom-to-operate and potential licensing opportunities.

2. Competitors and Key Patents

  • Competitors holding patents on related compounds, formulations, or methods.
  • Patent applications claiming broad genus claims with potential to encompass EP4201424’s invention.
  • Recent patent grants indicating active R&D in this therapeutic niche.

By analyzing these patents, stakeholders can identify overlapping claims, design-around strategies, or areas where EP4201424 enjoys strong enforceability.

3. Lifecycle and Patent Turnover

The patent’s expiry date (usually 20 years from filing, subject to adjustments) indicates the window of market exclusivity. Ongoing patent filings post-EP4201424 can extend patent life via divisions or new inventions, complicating competitive landscapes.


Implications for Business Strategy

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): A rigorous FTO analysis should incorporate this patent’s claims concerning the core compound and therapeutic use.
  • Partnering and Licensing: The patent's scope could be attractive for licensing negotiations, especially if it covers a novel therapeutic mechanism.
  • Infringement Risks: Companies developing similar compounds must scrutinize claim language to avoid infringement.
  • Research and Development: Identifying claims related to specific polymorphs or formulations can influence formulation strategies.

Summary of Key Findings

  • The scope of EP4201424 appears centered on a novel compound or class, with specific claims extending to compositions, methods of use, and manufacturing processes.
  • Its breadth likely balances broad genus claims with specific embodiments, designed to withstand validity challenges.
  • The patent landscape features overlapping patents in the same therapeutic area, necessitating detailed FTO assessments.
  • The patent provides a strategic foothold in a competitive space, contingent upon enforcement and validation of claims.

Key Takeaways

  • Thoroughly review the patent’s claims in conjunction with prior art to determine enforceability and scope.
  • Leverage the patent’s claims for licensing or collaborative R&D opportunities within the protected therapeutic niche.
  • Conduct comprehensive landscape analysis to identify potential patent encumbrances or design-around opportunities.
  • Monitor patent Family filings to anticipate extensions of exclusivity beyond EP4201424.
  • Consider preparing patent strategies around patent landscaping insights, including defensibility and innovation gaps.

FAQs

Q1: What is the likely scope of EP4201424’s claims?
A1: The claims most likely cover a specific chemical compound or class with defined structural features, along with pharmaceutical compositions and methods of use related to certain therapeutic indications.

Q2: How does EP4201424 fit into the overall patent landscape?
A2: It exists within a complex web of patents covering similar compounds or methods. Analyzing prior art and overlapping claims helps determine freedom-to-operate and licensing opportunities.

Q3: Can EP4201424's claims be challenged or invalidated?
A3: Yes, if prior art predates the filing date or if the claims lack an inventive step, challengers can seek invalidation through EPO proceedings or oppositions.

Q4: How can businesses utilize this patent strategically?
A4: Companies can use its claims for licensing, partnership, or to inform R&D directions, while also designing-around strategies to avoid infringement.

Q5: What is the duration of protection for EP4201424?
A5: Typically, European patents last 20 years from the filing date, subject to annuities and regulatory exclusivities.


References

  1. European Patent Office. EP4201424 patent document, details available through the EPO database.
  2. European Patent Convention (EPC), Rules governing patent grants and legal status.
  3. Industry reports on patent landscapes in pharmaceuticals and biotechnologies.

Note: Precise filing and grant dates, inventor information, and specific claim language are essential for detailed legal analysis; consult official patent documents for comprehensive review.


End of Analysis

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.