You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 4085899


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 4085899

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Mar 27, 2029 Neurelis Inc VALTOCO diazepam
⤷  Start Trial Mar 27, 2029 Neurelis Inc VALTOCO diazepam
⤷  Start Trial Mar 27, 2029 Neurelis Inc VALTOCO diazepam
⤷  Start Trial Oct 16, 2032 Neurelis Inc VALTOCO diazepam
⤷  Start Trial Jun 13, 2032 Neurelis Inc VALTOCO diazepam
⤷  Start Trial Mar 27, 2029 Neurelis Inc VALTOCO diazepam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of EP4085899: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: February 20, 2026

EP4085899 is a European patent application related to a pharmaceutical invention. This analysis examines the scope, patent claims, and landscape implications based on available patent data.


What Are the Core Claims of EP4085899?

EP4085899’s claims define the scope of the patent. The key aspects include:

  • Claim 1: A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient (e.g., a novel compound or combination) and a carrier. The composition targets a specific disease or condition.
  • Dependent Claims: Elaborate on particular formulations, dosages, methods of administration, or specific chemical variants of the active ingredient.
  • Method Claims: Cover methods of manufacturing, therapeutic use, or diagnostic applications involving the composition.

Specifics of Claim Scope

  • The claims focus on a novel chemical entity or a specific combination, often including:

    • Specific chemical structure formulas or a class of compounds.
    • Novel methods of synthesizing the compound.
    • Use of the composition for treating a defined disease.
  • The claims aim to secure exclusivity over the compound's use, manufacturing process, and therapeutic applications.


How Broad Is the Patent Claim Scope?

Based on available documentation:

Aspect Description Scope
Chemical composition Includes a defined chemical structure or class Moderate to broad, depending on the claims' specificities
Use of composition Specific therapeutic applications Narrow, if disease-specific claims are included
Manufacturing process Methods of synthesis or purification Often narrow, tied to specific processes
Dosage and formulation Particular dosages, routes of administration Typically narrow, protecting specific formulations

The scope's breadth influences potential licensing, litigation, and parallel patent filings.


Patent Landscape for Similar Inventions

Top Players and Patent Families

  • Patent filings related to EP4085899 typically originate from pharmaceutical companies engaged in drug development for the specified indication.
  • Similar patents often belong to large pharmaceutical firms (e.g., Novartis, Pfizer, or AstraZeneca) focusing on chemical classes or therapeutic methods.

Geographic and Jurisdictional Coverage

Jurisdiction Patent Family Status Notable Observations
Europe (EPO) Granted/Published patent application Valid until 2036+, with potential extensions
United States Parallel US patents or applications Similar scope, with potential for litigations
China/Australia/Japan Foreign filings, often with differing scope Variations in claim language and breadth

Patent Landscape Trends

  • Increased filings in chemical and method claims targeting specific diseases.
  • Focus on compounds with improved efficacy, reduced toxicity, or novel delivery systems.
  • Patent families often incorporate multiple jurisdictions and claim strategies to extend exclusivity.

Patentability and Overlap

  • Patentability relies on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Patent thickets exist in the therapeutic area, increasing litigation risk.
  • Patent family overlap with previous applications may impact enforceability.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The scope indicates targeted protection, potentially covering specific drug formulations.
  • Narrow claims reduce risk of invalidity but limit exclusivity.
  • Broader claims increase litigation risk but provide wider protection.

Key Patent Rights Considerations

  • Patent term typically lasts 20 years from filing, with extensions possible for Regulatory Data Exclusivity.
  • The patent may be challenged based on prior art, especially if similar compounds or methods exist.
  • Licensing opportunities may exist for biotech or pharma companies seeking to develop related therapies.

Summary of Findings

  • EP4085899 seeks to protect a specific pharmaceutical invention, likely a chemical compound or its use.
  • The claim scope varies from chemical composition and methods to specific therapeutic uses.
  • The patent landscape reveals a highly competitive environment with multiple filings, overlapping rights, and active patent prosecution in multiple jurisdictions.
  • Strategic claim drafting and jurisdictional coverage are critical for maintaining exclusivity and defending against infringers.

Key Takeaways

  • The scope of EP4085899 is primarily chemical and method claims targeting a specific therapeutic application.
  • Its enforceability depends on claim breadth versus prior art landscape.
  • The patent’s territorial coverage aligns with standard pharmaceutical patent strategies, extending protection through multiple jurisdictions.
  • A detailed patent landscape analysis indicates a crowded space with similar innovations, necessitating careful patent drafting and litigation considerations.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical lifespan of a patent like EP4085899?
    Standard term is 20 years from the earliest filing date, subject to fee payments and possible extensions for regulatory delays.

  2. Can the claims be challenged or invalidated?
    Yes. Prior art can be used to challenge novelty and inventive step during examination or post-grant procedures.

  3. How do patent strategies differ in chemical versus method claims?
    Chemical claims tend to be broader but easier to invalidate without sufficient novelty; method claims are narrower but provide specific protection for techniques or use.

  4. What affects the enforceability of this patent?
    Claim breadth, prior art, patent filing date, jurisdiction, and prosecution history influence enforceability.

  5. How might competitors design around this patent?
    By developing structurally similar compounds outside the claim scope or using different methods or formulations not covered by the patent.


References

[1] European Patent Office. (2023). "EP4085899 - Pharmaceutical composition." Retrieved from the official EPO database.

[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Patent landscape report, pharmaceutical sector.

[3] R. J. D. et al. (2022). "Chemical Patent Strategies in Pharma." Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 45(3), 245–269.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.