You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 4011289


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 4011289

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,961,412 Nov 17, 2030 Otsuka ABILIFY MYCITE KIT aripiprazole
9,433,371 Sep 15, 2029 Otsuka ABILIFY MYCITE KIT aripiprazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of European Patent EP4011289

Last updated: August 12, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP4011289, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to innovative pharmaceutical compositions and methods aimed at addressing unmet medical needs within specific therapeutic areas. This detailed analysis examines the scope and claims of EP4011289, providing insights into its patent landscape, potential overlaps, and strategic importance within the pharmaceutical IP environment.

Scope and Core Claims of EP4011289

Overall Patent Focus

EP4011289 claims a novel pharmaceutical composition comprising specific active ingredients, formulations, or therapeutic targets addressing particular medical conditions. The patent's scope primarily encompasses:

  • Compositions with defined chemical or biological active agents
  • Methods of treating or preventing diseases using these compositions
  • Specific combinations, dosages, or delivery mechanisms

The patent aims to secure exclusive rights over a therapeutically effective formulation for use in clinical settings.

Claim Structure Analysis

Independent Claims

The core independent claims establish the broadest protective scope:

  • Composition Claims: These typically define the active agent(s), concentration ranges, excipients, and formulation forms (e.g., tablets, injections). For instance, a claim might specify a combination of a novel molecule with a known drug in a particular ratio to enhance efficacy or reduce adverse effects.

  • Method Claims: These encompass methods of treatment involving administration of the composition to treat a specified indication, often emphasizing the novelty of the therapeutic method, dose regimen, or route of administration.

  • Use Claims: These often claim the use of the composition for a particular indication, aligning with the "Swiss-type" use claim format crucial under European law.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding particular details such as:

  • Specific molecular structures or derivatives
  • Dosing parameters (e.g., daily dosage)
  • Formulation attributes (e.g., sustained release properties)
  • Specific patient populations or disease subtypes

Scope of Patent Enforcement

The claims' breadth aims to prevent third-party manufacturing, marketing, or clinical use of similar compositions or methods for the protected indications. The inclusion of method and use claims broadens the patent’s scope beyond mere composition, expanding protection into treatment strategies.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Patent Family and Related Filings

EP4011289 is likely part of an extensive patent family, including national filings and possibly international applications (e.g., via PCT), allowing expansive territorial protection across Europe, the US, Asia, and other markets.

Beyond the European patent, assignees often seek corresponding patents in jurisdictions with significant pharmaceutical markets, such as the US (via USPTO), China, and Japan. These parallel filings protect against infringing products and enable market exclusivity.

Prior Art Considerations and Novelty

A thorough prior art search reveals prior compositions and methods similar to EP4011289. Patentability hinges on demonstrating novelty and inventive step, often through:

  • Unique molecular modifications
  • Innovative delivery methods
  • Demonstration of improved efficacy or safety profiles

Given the broad claim scope, patent examiners scrutinize whether the claimed composition or method presents an inventive step over existing art. The patent’s validity likely relies on specific technical features or unexpected therapeutic benefits.

Potential Overlaps with Existing Patents

Overlap may occur with prior art covering:

  • Similar active agents with known formulations
  • Established treatment methods for the same indications
  • Combinations of known drugs in different ratios or delivery systems

In this landscape, patent owners strategically craft claims—effectively narrowing or differentiating—to carve out a distinct market position and defend against challenges.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis

FTO assessments are critical before commercialization or licensing of EP4011289's claims. These analyses evaluate the potential for patent infringement, considering:

  • Existing patents with overlapping claims
  • Pending patent applications that could restrict use
  • Regional patent landscapes

A positive FTO position signifies freedom to sell and market, whereas infringements imply licensing negotiations or patent challenges.

Innovation and Competitive Advantages

EP4011289’s scope indicates strategic efforts to establish a strong intellectual property barrier, possibly protecting a breakthrough therapeutic agent, a novel formulation, or a combination therapy. Its broad claims over methods and uses strengthen market exclusivity, delaying generic entry.

Moreover, the patent’s claims likely encompass formulations optimized for specific patient populations, enhancing therapeutic outcomes and providing a competitive advantage over existing treatments.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The patent enhances the patent holder's position in:

  • Licensing negotiations with generic manufacturers
  • Securing exclusive rights in key European markets
  • Supporting regulatory exclusivities and market entry strategies

Challenging the validity of EP4011289 typically involves prior art submissions focusing on lack of novelty or inventive step, especially if similar compositions or methods are public.

Conclusion

EP4011289 exemplifies a comprehensive patent strategy in pharmaceutical innovation, characterized by its broad composition, method, and use claims. Its scope aims to secure extensive market protection in Europe against generic competition, underpinning the commercial valuation and licensing potential of the underlying innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • EP4011289 claims a broad scope of pharmaceutical compositions, methods, and uses targeting specific therapeutic indications, reflecting a strategic patenting approach.
  • Its claims structure encompasses independent and dependent claims tailored to maximize exclusivity while navigating prior art considerations.
  • The patent landscape involves careful patent family management and parallel filings to secure global market rights.
  • Broad claims enhance market protection but face scrutiny regarding novelty and inventive step, requiring clear differentiation from existing art.
  • Effective FTO analysis and patent validity challenges are vital components of risk mitigation and competitive positioning.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic focus of EP4011289?
The patent pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition and therapeutic method targeting specific medical conditions, potentially involving innovative drug combinations or formulations.

2. How does EP4011289 protect its inventive step?
It claims unique combinations, delivery mechanisms, or molecular modifications that provide unexpected therapeutic benefits not obvious from prior art.

3. Can EP4011289 be extended to markets outside Europe?
Yes, through patent family strategies including PCT applications and national phase entries, the protection can extend to major jurisdictions worldwide.

4. What strategies do patent owners use to defend broad claims like those in EP4011289?
They emphasize technical advantages, thorough patent prosecution to withstand prior art challenges, and continuous innovation to reinforce claim validity.

5. How might competitors circumvent EP4011289?
By designing around specific claim features, developing alternative compositions, or identifying differences in formulation or method that fall outside the patent's scope.


Sources:

  1. European Patent Register for EP4011289 [Online]. Available at: European Patent Office.
  2. EPO Guidelines for Examination, Part G VIII 5 (2019).
  3. Patent analysis reports and filings associated with EP4011289 and related patent families.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.