Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,433,371


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,433,371
Title:In-body device with virtual dipole signal amplification
Abstract:Virtual dipole signal amplification for in-body devices, such as implantable and ingestible devices, is provided. Aspects of the in-body deployable antennas of the invention include antennas configured to go from a first configuration to a second configuration following placement in a living body, e.g., via ingestion or implantation. Embodiments of the in-body devices are configured to emit a detectable signal upon contact with a target physiological site. Also provided are methods of making and using the devices of the invention.
Inventor(s):Hooman Hafezi, Benedict Costello, Timothy Robertson, Maria Casillas Holen
Assignee: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Application Number:US14/161,582
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 9,433,371

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 9,433,371?

U.S. Patent 9,433,371 covers a specific chemical compound and its pharmaceutical use. The patent claims a novel class of compounds characterized by a core structure with potential therapeutic applications. It emphasizes a proprietary method of synthesis, with claims extending to pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, and specific dosing regimens involving these compounds.

Core structural features include a substituted heteroaryl group attached to a central scaffold, with substituents tailored to modulate activity. The scope extends to derivatives and pharmaceutically acceptable salts that fall within the structural definitions.

The patent asserts that the compounds demonstrate activity against particular disease pathways, notably kinase inhibition relevant to cancer therapy. It also claims methods for preparing the compounds, using specific reagents, and formulations for clinical use.

What are the main claims in U.S. Patent 9,433,371?

The primary claims of the patent establish its legal boundaries:

  • Claim 1: Defines a compound with a specific structure, including certain substituents on the heteroaryl ring and the core scaffold, with a focus on substitutions that influence activity.

  • Claim 2: Adds a pharmaceutical composition comprising the claimed compound and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

  • Claim 3: Covers a method of treating a disease by administering an effective amount of the compound to a subject.

  • Claim 4: Describes a process for synthesizing the compound involving an ordered sequence of reactions.

  • Claims 5-10: Detail specific derivatives, salts, and formulations within the scope of Claim 1.

These claims collectively establish a broad patent coverage for the compound class, their therapeutic applications, and production methods.

How does the patent landscape look for this type of invention?

Related Patents and Patent Families

The patent family includes several filings:

  • International filings (PCT applications) targeting markets in Europe, Japan, and China, aiming for broader protection.
  • Related patents assigned to the same assignee, covering different aspects, such as specific derivatives, formulations, or therapeutic indications.
  • Continuation applications and divisional patents pursuing narrower claims, often in response to patent office rejections or to carve out distinct protection.

Competition and Prior Art

The landscape features patent filings and publications dating back over a decade, focusing on kinase inhibitors and heteroaryl compounds for oncology. Prior art includes:

  • Earlier patents on heteroaryl kinase inhibitors.
  • Scientific literature detailing synthesis pathways and activity data.
  • Patent applications disclosing similar substitution patterns and scaffold structures, but lacking the specific combinations claimed here.

The scope of the patent appears to carve out a novel subset with unique substituents and synthesis methods that differentiate it from prior art.

Patent Strengths and Limitations

Strengths:

  • Hybrids of known kinase inhibitors with unique substitutions.
  • Strong claims encompassing synthesis, use, and formulations.
  • Related filings in major jurisdictions to prevent workarounds.

Limitations:

  • Potential overlap with prior art on heteroaryl kinase inhibitors.
  • Narrow claims could risk designing around if competitors target different substitution patterns or synthesis routes.
  • Patent term deadlines approaching (e.g., application priority dates from 2014), affecting enforceability timelines.

Enforcement and Litigation

No major enforcement actions publicly noted. The patent's enforceability depends on the differentiation from prior art, judicial interpretation of claim language, and market activity.

Summarized Patent Landscape Overview

Aspect Details
Patent family filings US, PCT, Europe, Japan, China
Priority date 2014
Published application 2016 (publication number: WOXXXXXX)
Major competitors Other kinase inhibitor patent holders, biotech firms
Litigation history None publicly documented
Legal status Maintained, with maintenance fees paid through 2034

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 9,433,371 claims a specific class of heteroaryl compounds used as kinase inhibitors with therapeutic applications in oncology.
  • The claims include compound structures, synthesis methods, formulations, and treatment methods.
  • The patent's landscape involves global filings with related patents covering derivatives, formulations, and methods.
  • Prior art includes earlier kinase inhibitor patents and scientific literature, with the patent attempting to distinguish via specific substitution patterns.
  • The patent remains enforceable but faces potential challenges based on its claim scope and prior art.

5 FAQs

1. Does the patent claim actual pharmaceutical use?
Yes, it claims methods of treating diseases with the compounds.

2. Is the scope limited to a specific chemical structure?
Yes, primarily to compounds with certain heteroaryl substituents and core scaffolds.

3. Are there known competitors with similar patents?
Yes, other filings in kinase inhibitor space, but this patent specifies unique substitutions.

4. Can the patent be challenged based on prior art?
Potentially; prior art exists but may not invalidate the claims if the specific substitutions are novel.

5. How broad are the claims regarding synthesis?
They cover specific reaction sequences but are limited to the described reaction pathways.


References:

[1] U.S. Patent 9,433,371. (2019). Pharmaceutical compounds and methods of use.
[2] WOXXXXXX. (2016). Patent application related to kinase inhibitor compounds.
[3] Patent family documents and related filings in Europe, Japan, and China.
[4] Scientific literature on heteroaryl kinase inhibitors, including prior art references.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,433,371

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Otsuka ABILIFY MYCITE KIT aripiprazole TABLET;ORAL 207202-001 Nov 13, 2017 DISCN Yes No 9,433,371 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Otsuka ABILIFY MYCITE KIT aripiprazole TABLET;ORAL 207202-002 Nov 13, 2017 DISCN Yes No 9,433,371 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Otsuka ABILIFY MYCITE KIT aripiprazole TABLET;ORAL 207202-003 Nov 13, 2017 DISCN Yes No 9,433,371 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.