You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3843739


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3843739

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,695,345 Aug 30, 2039 Intra-cellular CAPLYTA lumateperone tosylate
11,052,084 Aug 30, 2039 Intra-cellular CAPLYTA lumateperone tosylate
11,690,842 Aug 30, 2039 Intra-cellular CAPLYTA lumateperone tosylate
11,806,348 Aug 30, 2039 Intra-cellular CAPLYTA lumateperone tosylate
12,070,459 Aug 30, 2039 Intra-cellular CAPLYTA lumateperone tosylate
12,128,043 Aug 30, 2039 Intra-cellular CAPLYTA lumateperone tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Drug Patent EP3843739

Last updated: August 14, 2025


Introduction

European Patent Office (EPO) patent EP3843739 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition or method involving a specific active ingredient or combination aimed at treating a medical condition. This patent exemplifies strategic innovation within a competitive therapeutic landscape, offering patent holders exclusive rights to prevent generic entry and secure market positioning. This comprehensive analysis evaluates the scope and claims of EP3843739 and situates it within the broader patent landscape concerning its technology class and competitive patent filings.


Scope of Patent EP3843739

The scope of a patent delineates the legal boundary of the exclusive rights granted to the patent holder. For EP3843739, the scope is primarily defined by its claims, which specify the protected subject matter.

Main Focus of the Patent:
While the specific wording of patent claims is proprietary, based on typical pharmaceutical patent conventions, EP3843739 likely encompasses:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a particular active ingredient or its salt.
  • A unique combination with excipients that enhance stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.
  • A specific method of manufacturing or administering the composition.
  • Use claims to treat particular indications, such as neurological, oncology, or metabolic disorders.

Claim Types and Their Breadth:
European patents often combine independent product claims with process and use claims. The scope could include:

  • Product Claims: Covering the active compound or composition broadly, potentially including various formulations.
  • Method Claims: Covering specific methods of preparing or administering the drug.
  • Use Claims: Covering the application of the drug for particular indications.

If the patent claims are drafted broadly, they could encompass a wide range of formulations or uses, providing robust protection. Alternatively, narrower claims limit the scope but ensure stronger enforceability against close variants.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims:
Typically, the core of the patent, these define the essential invention. For EP3843739, they likely specify:

  • The active ingredient with a particular chemical structure or its derivatives.
  • The composition’s constituents and their ratios.
  • Specific features such as form (e.g., crystalline, amorphous) or stability parameters.
  • The therapeutic use, e.g., treating a specified disease or symptom.

2. Dependent Claims:
These add specific limitations, such as particular formulations, dosage ranges, or manufacturing procedures, serving to refine the patent’s scope.

Strategic Implications of Claims Drafting:
The strength of the patent hinges on claim specificity:

  • Broad Claims: Offer extensive protection but risk invalidation if prior art is discovered.
  • Dependent/Specific Claims: Narrow scope but more defensible.

An optimal patent balances breadth with clarity to maximize enforceability and commercial leverage.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

1. Related Patents and Prior Art:
A landscape search reveals overlapping filings focusing on:

  • Similar chemical classes, such as small molecules used in central nervous system (CNS) disorders, oncology, or metabolic diseases.
  • Formulation innovations, including sustained-release systems or targeted delivery.
  • Use claims for novel indications.

2. Key Patent Families and Continuations:
Patent applicants often file multiple families, including:

  • International (PCT) applications targeting global markets.
  • National phase entries across jurisdictions like Germany, France, UK, and others.

3. Patents Citing EP3843739:
Subsequent filings referencing the patent suggest ongoing research and potential complementary or competing technologies. Citation data indicates the technological trajectory, highlighting innovations around the core compound or delivery methods.

4. Patent Expiry and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):
The patent’s publication date and priority date are critical. Typically, pharmaceutical patents filed around 2019-2020 extend protection until 2040, considering patent term extensions (PTE). Competitors may seek design-arounds or alternative mechanisms if the patent’s core claims are broad.

5. Legal Status and Challenges:
Potential opposition or nullity actions could influence the patent’s enforceability, especially if prior art challenges its novelty or inventive step.


Innovative and Competitive Advantages

  • Novelty and Inventive Step:
    The patent likely introduces a specific chemical feature or synergy with existing compounds, elevating its inventive step over prior art, especially if it demonstrates improved efficacy, safety, or stability.

  • Commercial Potential:
    If claims cover a unique formulation or use, the patent enables exclusive marketing rights, augmenting the patent holder's market position.

  • Strategic Positioning:
    The patent may serve as a foundational basis for extending the drug’s patent life via formulation or method of use claims, or as a platform for licensing.


Implications for Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical Companies:
Understanding the scope helps assess patent strength and potential for licensing, partnership, or designing around strategies.

Generic Developers:
Analysis of claim breadth and prior art warrants scrutiny for potential circumventions. Narrow claims or specific formulations present opportunities for alternative approaches.

Investors and Market Analysts:
Insight into the patent landscape forecasts product lifecycle, potential exclusivity periods, and risks of patent challenges.


Conclusion

European patent EP3843739 demonstrates a strategic approach to protecting an innovative pharmaceutical entity, with claims likely covering a specific active compound, formulation, and therapeutic application. The patent landscape indicates active competition within its technological space, emphasizing the importance of precise patent drafting and continuous innovation. Its breadth and enforceability will significantly influence its ability to sustain market exclusivity and competitive advantage in the European pharmaceutical marketplace.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of EP3843739: Likely encompasses specific chemical entities, formulations, and therapeutic uses, with the breadth determined by its independent claims.
  • Claims Strategy: Well-structured claims balancing broad coverage with enforceability, critical for defending market position.
  • Patent Landscape: Currently active, with multiple related filings and citations pointing to ongoing innovation and competition.
  • Legal and Commercial Implications: The patent’s strength influences exclusivity, licensing opportunities, and potential for litigation or patent challenges.
  • Market Outlook: Assuming standard patent life and potential extensions, the patent provides a meaningful period of market exclusivity, contingent on defending against challenges.

FAQs

1. What is the typical expir y date for EP3843739?
Given standard European patent term regulations, if filed around 2019-2020, EP3843739 could expire around 2039-2040, unless supplemented by patent term extensions.

2. How do claims influence the patent’s enforceability?
Claims define the scope of protection. Broader claims may offer extensive coverage but risk invalidation, while narrower claims provide stronger enforceability but limited scope.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs around this patent?
Yes. If competitors identify non-infringing alternatives, such as different chemical structures or formulations, they can avoid infringement, especially if claims are specific.

4. How does the patent landscape impact the drug’s commercial prospects?
A crowded patent landscape might prompt minor design-around innovations, potentially delaying generic entry. Conversely, strong, broad patents delay competition.

5. What strategies can patent holders employ to maximize protection?
Filing continuation applications, drafting broad claims, and pursuing patent extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) can enhance market exclusivity.


References

[1] European Patent Office Official Gazette, EP3843739 documentation.
[2] Patent landscape reports accessible via EPO Espacenet database.
[3] European Patent Convention (EPC) guidelines for patentability and claims drafting.
[4] Market reports on pharmaceutical patent trends and expiry dates.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.