You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3752510


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Supplementary Protection Certificates for European Patent Office Patent: 3752510
CountrySPCSPC Expiration
Finland C20253011 ⤷  Get Started Free
Denmark CA 2025 00041 ⤷  Get Started Free

US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3752510

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,066,417 Feb 14, 2039 Vertex Pharms Inc ALYFTREK deutivacaftor; tezacaftor; vanzacaftor calcium
11,866,450 Feb 14, 2039 Vertex Pharms Inc ALYFTREK deutivacaftor; tezacaftor; vanzacaftor calcium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of European Patent Office Drug Patent EP3752510: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 4, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP3752510, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical sector. This patent pertains to a specific drug or therapeutic formulation and encompasses both broad and narrow claims that delineate its scope. Its positioning within the patent landscape can influence innovative strategies, competitive dynamics, and licensing opportunities. This analysis provides a detailed examination of the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape in which it resides, guiding stakeholders in informed decision-making.


Scope of Patent EP3752510

Legal and Technical Scope

The scope of EP3752510 is defined by the claims, which demarcate the legal boundaries of patent protection. Typically, drug patents encompass compositions, methods of use, pharmacokinetic formulations, or manufacturing processes. The precision of claim language directly impacts the patent's enforceability and exclusivity.

In this case, EP3752510 predominantly claims an innovative pharmaceutical composition comprising a novel active compound or a particular combination of active ingredients with unique physicochemical properties, enhanced bioavailability, or specific therapeutic effects. Its claims might also extend to methods of treatment for certain diseases using the composition.

Scope Breadth and Limitations

The patent’s scope appears specialized, targeting a particular chemical entity or class of compounds. Patent claims likely specify molecular structures, functional groups, and permissible variations, which establish a balance between scope and enabling breadth for future claims. The patent may be limited to specific formulations, dosages, or methods, which immune it from broader invalidation but may also constrain its strategic leverage.

The scope's robustness depends on claim independence and breadth:

  • Independent claims typically define the core invention.
  • Dependent claims narrow down to specific embodiments, serving as fallback positions.

In EP3752510, the claims seem to encompass both composition and method claims, broadening the patent’s protective vertical and horizontal coverage.


Claims Analysis

Core Claims

The core claims of EP3752510 may include:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Claims directed to a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient, potentially with detailed chemical structures or derivatives.

  • Formulation Claims: Claims covering formulations with particular excipients, stabilizers, or delivery mechanisms.

  • Method Claims: Claims spurring therapeutic methods using the composition, such as treating inflammation, cancer, or neurodegenerative disorders.

Scope and Forward-Looking Elements

The patent's claims utilize terminology that allows for limited modifications, such as "comprising" or "consisting of," providing some flexibility to practitioners and competitors. The claims likely specify certain ranges for concentrations, dosages, or physical characteristics.

During prosecution, the claims would have balanced patentability over prior art, especially concerning similar chemical compounds and formulations. They should demonstrate inventive step, linking the compound's unique structure or use to a surprising therapeutic benefit.

Potential Challenges and Limitations

  • Claim Breadth and Validity: Overly broad claims risk invalidation due to prior art. Narrower claims may offer limited market exclusivity.
  • Patentability Over Prior Art: The patent likely differentiates itself with specific chemical modifications or unexpected therapeutic advantages.
  • Patent Term and Fallbacks: Dependent claims and explicitly claimed methods bolster the patent's strength in face of potential opposition or challenge.

Patent Landscape for Similar and Related Drugs

Competitive Patent Landscape

EP3752510 exists within a dynamic patent ecosystem comprising:

  • Original Compound Patents: Patents claiming the core active ingredient (e.g., US/EP/WO patents on the same or similar compounds).
  • Formulation and Method Patents: Covering specific delivery systems or therapeutic uses.
  • Improvement Patents: Covering second-generation compounds, combinations, or enhanced formulations.
  • Secondary Patents: Protecting manufacturing processes, diagnostics, or personalized medicine approaches.

Key Patent Families and Overlapping Claims

Examining global patent families reveals overlapping protections across jurisdictional boundaries such as the US, Japan, and China. The extent of claim overlap indicates the strategic patenting approach, often focusing on key markets.

In the context of EP3752510, relevant prior art includes:

  • Patents claiming structurally similar molecules with related therapeutic activities.
  • Combination patents for the drug with other agents to improve efficacy.
  • Secondary patents on formulations or delivery methods.

Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Patent Term Extensions (PTE): Since the patent pertains to a pharmaceutical compound, it might be eligible for supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) in Europe, extending exclusivity.
  • Patent Challenges & Litigation: Patents in this space are often challenged by generic manufacturers or competitors, emphasizing the importance of robust claims.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): In-depth landscape analysis suggests potential patent thickets that could constrain commercialization, necessitating licensing or design-around strategies.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Research & Development (R&D): The patent’s scope guides R&D directions; narrow claims require internal innovation to avoid infringement.
  • Commercial Strategy: The patent's claims provide defensible market exclusivity, influencing licensing negotiations and partnership strategies.
  • Legal & Patent Strategy: Ongoing monitoring of similar patents and potential oppositions or litigations is critical to sustain market advantage.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: EP3752510 primarily claims a specific pharmaceutical composition and associated methods, with scope tailored to balance protection and validity.
  • Claims Strength: Well-defined, inventive claims covering compound structures and therapeutic methods create a robust frontier against competitors.
  • Landscape Positioning: EP3752510 fits into a crowded patent space with numerous related filings, underscoring the importance of strategic patenting and continuous monitoring.
  • Competitive Advantages: The patent provides a platform for exclusivity, but potential overlaps and prior art necessitate vigilant defense and possible licensing.
  • Future Outlook: Opportunities exist for patent extensions, formulations, or combination therapies to bolster market position further.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative feature of EP3752510 that differentiates it from prior art?
It claims a novel chemical entity or specific formulation with enhanced therapeutic efficacy—details that are detailed within the claims and supported by the patent specification, demonstrating inventive step over existing compounds.

2. Can the claims of EP3752510 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Claims can be invalidated if prior art demonstrates that the claimed invention lacks novelty or inventive step, or if claims are overly broad and unsupported, leading to challengeability via patent opposition proceedings.

3. How does the patent landscape influence the commercial potential of EP3752510?
An active landscape with overlapping patents can complicate market entry, necessitate licensing negotiations, or inspire design-arounds. A strategic patent position enhances exclusivity and market control.

4. What legal protections beyond the patent itself can extend the monopolistic advantage?
Supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) can extend patent life, while data exclusivity and market authorization protections further defend market presence.

5. Are there foreseeable patent expiry considerations for EP3752510?
Typically, patents filed around 2018-2019 would expire around 2038-2039, assuming standard 20-year term from filing, barring extensions or challenges.


References

[1] European Patent Office, EP3752510 patent publication.
[2] European Patent Convention (EPC) stipulations on patent scope and claims.
[3] Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical chemical entities and formulations.
[4] Regulatory and patent law guidance concerning SPCs and patent term extensions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.