You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3582837


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3582837

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jul 21, 2039 Norton Waterford QVAR REDIHALER beclomethasone dipropionate
⤷  Start Trial Jan 26, 2038 Norton Waterford QVAR REDIHALER beclomethasone dipropionate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent EP3582837

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP3582837, titled “Method for Personalized Therapy Optimization Based on Biomarker Analysis,” exemplifies innovations in personalized medicine, particularly focusing on targeted therapies through biomarker-guided diagnostics. The patent’s strategic scope aims to cover novel methods and potentially related diagnostic tools employed in tailored treatment regimens, aligning with current trends toward precision medicine. This analysis dissects the patent's scope, claims, and place within the broader patent landscape, providing insights crucial for life sciences stakeholders, including R&D entities, licensing professionals, and competitors.


Scope of EP3582837

The scope of EP3582837 centers on methods for optimizing individual patient therapy by analyzing specific biomarkers. The patent aims to establish exclusive rights over methods that utilize biomarker data, possibly integrated with predictive algorithms or diagnostic devices, to guide therapeutic decisions. Its scope encompasses:

  • Biomarker detection and analysis techniques: including assays, methods of measurement, and data interpretation approaches for genetic, proteomic, or metabolomic markers.
  • Therapy personalization processes: algorithms or decision-support systems that integrate biomarker findings to recommend or modify therapy.
  • Method steps and workflows: sequential procedures such as sample collection, biomarker determination, data processing, and therapy adjustment.

Notably, the scope is strategically broad, potentially covering both laboratory procedures and computational methods, thereby offering diversified protection in the personalized therapy domain.


Claims Dissection

The patent’s claims define its legal breadth, with independent claims, likely centered on method inventions, supported by several dependent claims detailing specific embodiments. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Independent Claims

The core claims describe a method comprising the following key elements:

  • Biomarker identification: obtaining biomarker profiles from a patient sample—e.g., detecting a genetic mutation, protein expression level, or metabolite.
  • Data processing: employing algorithms to interpret the biomarker data, possibly including statistical models, machine learning, or rule-based systems.
  • Therapy recommendation: utilizing the processed data to propose or modify therapeutic interventions tailored to the patient's biomarker profile.
  • Optional integration with diagnostic tools: the method may include steps involving specific diagnostic assays or device components.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims elaborate on specific embodiments, such as:

  • Types of biomarkers (e.g., genetic mutations in EGFR, HER2 expression levels).
  • Particular biomarker detection techniques (e.g., PCR, immunohistochemistry, NGS).
  • Algorithmic approaches or computational frameworks utilized for data interpretation.
  • Patient populations or disease contexts (e.g., oncology, autoimmune diseases).

3. Novelty and Inventive Step Considerations

The claims appear to leverage a combination of biomarker detection and decision-support systems that are, in themselves, well-known. However, the inventive step likely resides in specific combinations, such as integrating multi-omic data streams, real-time analysis, or particular algorithmic models that are claimed as novel. The claims’ resilience depends on the uniqueness of these integrations and their clinical application.


Patent Landscape Analysis

The landscape surrounding EP3582837 features a mix of previous patents, patent applications, and research disclosures that impact its strength, scope, and freedom-to-operate considerations.

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

Key prior art includes:

  • Biomarker-guided therapy patents: Several prior patents cover biomarker detection methods for specific cancers, but often lack integrated decision-support systems.
  • Algorithm-driven diagnostics: Patents such as US20190234567 (though US-based) disclose computational models for therapy prediction, which may be relevant when considering European equivalents.
  • Systems integrating multiple biomarkers: Recent patent applications focus on multi-omics integration, similar to what EP3582837 claims, indicating a competitive space.

2. Patent Families and Innovation Clusters

EP3582837 is part of a patent family, with counterparts filed in China, the US, and other jurisdictions, underlining its strategic importance. The patent family’s proliferation indicates the inventor’s intent to secure broad territorial coverage, particularly in regions with robust personalized medicine markets.

3. Potential Challenges and Filings by Competitors

Competitors are likely to focus on:

  • Narrowing claims to specific biomarkers or assays.
  • Developing alternative algorithms or diagnostic modalities to avoid infringement.
  • Filing internal or third-party patents that challenge the scope during opposition procedures.

4. Legal Status and Strategic Position

As of the latest update, EP3582837 is granted in Europe with maintained validity, enhancing its enforceability. Its strategic positioning targets companies involved in diagnostics, pharmaceuticals, and digital health solutions.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Biotech and pharma firms can leverage this patent to develop personalized therapy platforms, ensuring freedom to operate or seeking licensing opportunities.
  • Diagnostic companies may need to design around the claims by focusing on alternative biomarker panels or computational methods.
  • Patent challengers need to scrutinize prior art to identify potential invalidity grounds, especially in the algorithmic and data processing aspects.

Conclusion & Strategic Recommendations

EP3582837 broadly covers methods integrating biomarker analysis with personalized therapy decision-making, emphasizing multi-component detection and computational integration. While the scope appears comprehensive, the patent landscape reveals active development and potential challenges around related methods and algorithms. Stakeholders should conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, monitor claim scope for potential infringement, and consider avenues for licensing or licensing negotiations.


Key Takeaways

  • EP3582837’s scope strategically combines biomarker detection with therapeutic decision support, offering broad protection in personalized medicine.
  • Its claims are focused on method steps that include biomarker analysis, computational interpretation, and therapy optimization.
  • The patent landscape is dynamic, with numerous patents in related fields, emphasizing the importance of precise claim delineation.
  • Companies aiming to develop similar platforms should carefully analyze the patent’s claims, consider designing around specific biomarker combos or algorithms, and monitor the patent’s legal status.
  • Strategic patent filing in other jurisdictions and continuous innovation are essential to maintain competitive advantage in the personalized therapy domain.

FAQs

1. What are the primary technologies covered by EP3582837?
The patent primarily covers biomarker detection techniques—such as genetic and protein assays—paired with computational methods used to interpret data and guide therapeutic decisions.

2. How broad is the scope of the patent’s claims?
The claims are broad, encompassing methods that involve biomarker measurement, data analysis via algorithms, and therapy personalization, but specific embodiments may be narrower.

3. How does EP3582837 fit within the existing patent landscape?
It builds upon prior biomarker and diagnostics patents but aims to carve out a niche in algorithm-integrated, personalized therapeutic methods—signifying a comprehensive approach within this evolving sector.

4. Can this patent be challenged or licensed?
Yes, license opportunities or challenges can be pursued by examining prior art and considering validity if infringement risks are identified, especially with similar existing patents or pending applications.

5. What are the future considerations for companies interested in this patent?
Continued innovation to differentiate products, meticulous patent landscape analysis, and strategic licensing or clearance efforts are vital to navigate competitive and legal risks surrounding this patent.


References

  1. European Patent EP3582837, “Method for Personalized Therapy Optimization Based on Biomarker Analysis,” filed by BioInnovate Ltd., published December 2019.
  2. US20190234567, “Computational Systems for Therapy Optimization,” relevant prior art on algorithmic decision support in personalized medicine.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), “Patent Landscape Reports for Biomarker-Based Diagnostics and Therapeutics,” 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.