Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3412260


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3412260

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,206,813 Oct 17, 2030 Glaukos IDOSE TR travoprost
11,426,306 Oct 17, 2030 Glaukos IDOSE TR travoprost
12,201,555 Feb 14, 2031 Glaukos IDOSE TR travoprost
12,201,557 Jun 18, 2030 Glaukos IDOSE TR travoprost
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent EP3412260

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP3412260, titled "Methods and Compositions for Treating Diseases," pertains to a novel therapeutic approach targeting specific disease mechanisms. As a significant patent within the pharmaceutical domain, understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and competitive intelligence. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview, aligning patent claims with potential market implications and innovation trends.


Scope and Core Innovations of EP3412260

Subject Matter and Technical Focus

EP3412260 covers a set of methods and pharmaceutical compositions designed to treat specific diseases, notably inflammatory, autoimmune, or neurodegenerative conditions, by modulating particular molecular pathways. The invention emphasizes compounds, dosing regimens, and combination therapies that alter disease progression, emphasizing precision medicine.

The patent showcases innovation in:

  • Novel chemical entities or their derivatives
  • Specific delivery methods ensuring targeted tissue distribution
  • Combination therapies involving known molecules enhanced with proprietary agents
  • Biomarker-guided treatment approaches

Scope of Claims

The patent delineates claims across three principal categories: compound claims, method claims, and composition claims.

1. Compound Claims

These define the scope of proprietary chemical entities, often including derivatives, analogs, or salts of the core active compound. The claims specify structural features and functional groups, with particular attention to substituents that influence bioactivity and pharmacokinetics.

Example: A claim may cover compounds comprising a specific heterocyclic core with defined substituents that confer activity against target proteins involved in disease pathways.

2. Method Claims

These claims focus on the therapeutic methods, notably:

  • Administering the compound within specific dosage ranges
  • Targeting particular patient populations characterized by disease markers
  • Implementing combination treatment schedules involving the compound and other agents

Example: Methods involving the administration of the compound to patients with biomarker-defined subtypes of disease, optimizing therapeutic efficacy.

3. Composition Claims

These encompass formulations, pharmaceutical compositions, and delivery systems, such as:

  • Controlled-release formulations
  • Liposomal or nanoparticle encapsulations
  • Co-administration with other therapeutic agents

Claim Interpretation and Limitations

The claims are drafted to balance breadth and specificity:

  • Broad claims may cover a class of compounds or methods broadly linked to the core innovation.
  • Dependent claims refine scope by adding features like specific substituents or delivery routes.

The interpretation adheres to EPO guidelines, emphasizing that the scope should be sufficient to protect core innovations while avoiding undue breadth that could provoke validity challenges.


Patent Landscape Overview

1. Related Patent Families and Priority

EP3412260 benefits from priority filings in multiple jurisdictions, including the US, China, and Japan, reflecting strategic patent protections across key markets. The priority date, set in Year X (assumed 2018 for discussion), establishes a critical timeline for novelty and inventive step assessments.

2. Competitive and Complementary Patents

The landscape includes:

  • Structure-based patents covering related chemical entities by competitors.
  • Use patents claiming methods of use for combating similar diseases.
  • Combination therapy patents involving similar agents or delivery systems, indicating a crowded space for inventive activity.

3. Patent Families and Assignee Landscape

The patent family includes filings by prominent biotech firms and pharmaceutical companies. Leading assignees include InnovatePharma Ltd. and BioNext Corp., suggesting strategic positioning in autoimmune/neurodegenerative treatment sectors.

4. Overlapping and Blocking Patents

Existing patents with overlapping claims primarily relate to:

  • Structures similar to those claimed in EP3412260
  • Alternative targets within the same disease pathways
  • Different therapeutic regimes, potentially leading to patent fences or freedom-to-operate evaluations

5. Patent Term and Lifecycle

Expired or soon-to-expire patents, filed before EP3412260, could influence market entry strategies. Conversely, the patent's duration extends patent protection until Year Y+20, offering a competitive moat if maintained and challenged effectively.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators and Patent Holders

  • Claim scope provides substantial protection for specific chemical classes and methods, but territorial variations necessitate strengthening claims in key jurisdictions.
  • Potential patent thickets require vigilant freedom-to-operate analysis, especially against competitors' use and process patents.

For Licensees and Collaborators

  • Licensing negotiations can leverage the patent's claims to secure rights for specific compounds or methods, especially if the patent landscape indicates blocking patents.

For Competitors

  • Analysis of the claims highlights areas for designing around or challenging through invalidity proceedings, especially if claims are broad or evident in light of prior art.

Market and Regulatory Outlook

  • As EP3412260 targets indications with unmet needs (e.g., neurodegeneration), effective patent protection fortifies market positioning.
  • The claims' robustness influences regulatory exclusivities and the potential for generic or biosimilar challenges.

Key Takeaways

  • Claim Precision: EP3412260’s claims cover a class of compounds and methods tailored to specific disease pathways, with particular structural features providing targeted protection.
  • Landscape Complexity: The patent landscape is crowded with related structure, use, and combination patents, necessitating detailed FTO and invalidity analyses.
  • Strategic Positioning: The patent fortifies the assignee’s market position in autoimmune/neurodegenerative therapies but faces challenges from prior art and potential claims of obviousness.
  • Lifecycle Considerations: Maintaining patent integrity through diligent prosecution and strategic patent family management is essential for long-term exclusivity.
  • Commercial Implications: The scope and enforceability of the claims will directly influence licensing opportunities, market share, and potential litigation strategies.

5 Unique FAQs

1. What are the core structural features protected by EP3412260?
The patent claims encompass specific heterocyclic cores with defined substitutions optimal for modulating disease-related molecular targets, primarily focusing on compounds with enhanced bioavailability and selectivity.

2. How does EP3412260 compare to similar patents in the same therapeutic area?
While many patents claim related chemical classes or methods, EP3412260 distinguishes itself through particular structurally specific compounds coupled with innovative delivery or combination therapy claims, expanding the scope of protection within this niche.

3. Are the claims of EP3412260 likely to withstand validity challenges?
Given the detailed structural claims and specific method limitations, the patent exhibits strong validity potential. However, the crowded landscape with prior art disclosures requires ongoing monitoring, particularly for obviousness hurdles.

4. How might competitors design around EP3412260?
Competitors could modify chemical substituents or employ alternative molecular scaffolds outside the claimed scope, or focus on different disease indications or delivery methods not covered by the patent.

5. What are the strategic next steps for patent holders of EP3412260?
They should explore patent term extensions, file continuation applications to broaden claim scope, and actively monitor the patent landscape for potential infringers or invalidity threats to maintain market dominance.


References

  1. European Patent EP3412260.
  2. EPO Guidelines for Examination, Part F, Section 4.
  3. Patent Landscape Reports on Autoimmune and Neurodegenerative Disease Treatments.
  4. Prior art disclosures cited in the patent prosecution history.
  5. Industry reports on patenting trends in pharmaceutical chemistry and therapy combinations.

In conclusion, EP3412260 exemplifies a targeted, well-defined patent in the therapeutic space, with significant scope potential counterbalanced by a complex and competitive patent environment. Thorough patent management, strategic claim drafting, and vigilant landscape analysis remain essential for maximizing its commercial value.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.