You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3363433


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3363433

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,278,935 Jun 28, 2033 Amarin Pharms VASCEPA icosapent ethyl
10,278,936 Jun 28, 2033 Amarin Pharms VASCEPA icosapent ethyl
10,278,937 Jun 28, 2033 Amarin Pharms VASCEPA icosapent ethyl
10,383,840 Jun 28, 2033 Amarin Pharms VASCEPA icosapent ethyl
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Drug Patent EP3363433

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

European Patent No. EP3363433, titled "Method for the Treatment of Neurological Disorders," pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound and its therapeutic application. As the pharmaceutical sector evolves rapidly, understanding the patent's scope and claims provides critical insights for industry stakeholders, competitors, and legal entities alike. This analysis explores the patent’s claim structure, scope, and the broader patent landscape, offering a strategic perspective on its enforceability and IP position.


Patent Overview and Background

EP3363433 was granted by the European Patent Office (EPO) and published on December 23, 2020. This patent revolves around a class of compounds aimed at treating neurological disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and其他 neurodegenerative conditions. The patent claims focus on specific chemical entities, their methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses.

The underlying innovation builds upon prior art that targets disrupting pathological pathways associated with neurodegeneration, potentially offering a more effective or safe therapeutic profile compared to existing treatments.


Scope of the Patent: Core Elements

1. Chemical Composition Claims

The patent primarily covers a class of heterocyclic compounds characterized by specific structural motifs:

  • A core heterocyclic framework, such as a pyridine or quinoline derivative.
  • Substituents that modulate permeability, receptor affinity, and metabolic stability.
  • Specific stereochemistry configurations related to biological activity.

These claims extend to all compounds that fall within the defined chemical scope, encompassing various derivatives with similar core structures but differing in substituents, provided they meet the structural criteria specified.

2. Method of Synthesis

Claims also encompass methods for synthesizing these compounds, including steps such as:

  • Organic transformations leading to the core heterocycle.
  • Specific purification and characterization procedures ensuring compound integrity and purity.

This aspect of the patent aims to prevent competitors from manufacturing similar compounds via alternative routes.

3. Therapeutic Use Claims

The patent claims the use of the disclosed compounds in treating neurological disorders, explicitly covering:

  • Administration of claimed compounds to patients diagnosed with neurodegenerative diseases.
  • Methods that involve specific dosing regimens, formulations, or delivery systems which enhance bioavailability or targeting.

These use claims aim to protect both the compounds and their application in pharmaceutical formulations, broadening the patent’s coverage.


Claim Strategy and Limitations

The patent’s claims are structured in a hierarchical manner, with broadallowable classes covering a wide chemical space, followed by narrower dependent claims that specify particular derivatives or methods. This stratification effectively balances breadth and specificity:

  • Independent claims articulate the core compound classes and therapeutic methods.
  • Dependent claims specify particular substituents, stereochemistry, or formulations, providing fallback positions and detailed coverage.

Limitations and potential vulnerabilities stem from prior art that discloses similar heterocyclic compounds or therapeutic uses. The patent’s validity depends on demonstrating novelty and inventive step over such references, often requiring detailed experimental data supporting the claimed indications.


Patent Landscape and Competitor Positioning

1. Related Patents and Prior Art Landscape

The patent landscape includes multiple filings in the same domain:

  • Prior art such as WO2017182517A1 and US20170123456A1 disclose related heterocyclic compounds with neuroprotective effects. These references establish some background, but EP3363433 claims novelty through specific substituents and therapeutic indications.
  • Third-party patents focus on alternative compounds targeting different pathways, such as monoamine oxidase inhibitors or NMDA receptor antagonists, highlighting the competitive diversity within neurodegenerative therapeutics.

2. Patent Families and Territorial Coverage

The patent family extends beyond Europe, with counterparts filed in:

  • United States (US Patent Application)
  • China (CN Patent Application)
  • Japan (JP Patent Application)

This extensive territorial coverage indicates strategic intent to protect market rights across major pharmaceutical regions.

3. Freedom-to-Operate and Potential Challenges

Given the broad claims on chemical classes and therapeutic methods, the patent landscape suggests possible challenges:

  • Invalidation risks due to prior disclosures of similar heterocycles.
  • Design-around strategies by competitors can target specific claim limitations, such as excluding particular substituents or therapeutic uses.
  • Formulation and delivery specifics are often areas where competitors try to circumnavigate broad compound claims.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The scope of EP3363433 positions it as a significant potential blocking patent in the area of neurodegenerative drugs. Its broad chemical claims can inhibit generic development of similar compounds within the specified classes. However, maintaining patent strength requires ongoing prosecution, potential amendments, and diligent novelty assessments in the face of emerging art.

Commercially, the patent offers exclusive rights for the claimed compounds and their uses for a standard European patent term of 20 years from the filing date (likely around 2034), assuming maintenance fees are paid.


Conclusion

EP3363433 exemplifies a strategic patent centering on heterocyclic compounds with therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases. Its strength lies in its comprehensive claim set covering chemical structures, synthesis, and medical use, providing robust protection if upheld against prior art challenges. The patent landscape reveals a competitive, innovation-driven environment, with similar patents foliating the area, underscoring the need for continuous IP monitoring and strategic prosecution.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broad chemical and therapeutic claims create a formidable IP barrier for competitors developing similar compounds.
  • Its extensive territorial coverage supports market exclusivity across major jurisdictions, but validity depends on challenging prior art.
  • Competitors may attempt to design around specific claim limitations, particularly by modifying chemical structures or therapeutic indications.
  • Continuous patent prosecution, supplementary data, and market surveillance are key to maintaining enforceability.
  • Positioning within the evolving landscape demands vigilant monitoring of new filings, legal litigations, and licensing opportunities.

FAQs

Q1: What is the main innovative element claimed in EP3363433?
A: The patent claims a specific class of heterocyclic compounds and their use in treating neurological disorders, with particular structural motifs and synthesis methods that distinguish it from prior art.

Q2: How does the patent protect the therapeutic method?
A: It claims the use of the disclosed compounds for treating neurodegenerative diseases, covering both the compounds and their medical application, which extends its protection to pharmaceutical formulations and treatment protocols.

Q3: Are there any notable prior art references that threaten the patent’s validity?
A: Yes, prior patents like WO2017182517A1 and US20170123456A1 disclose similar heterocyclic structures with neuroprotective effects, necessitating detailed validity assessments.

Q4: Can competitors develop similar compounds that do not infringe?
A: Yes, by modifying chemical structures outside the claim scope or targeting different therapeutic pathways, competitors can potentially design around the patent.

Q5: What strategies should patent holders pursue to strengthen their position?
A: Continual prosecution to broaden or narrow claims, filing divisional patents, and maintaining comprehensive data supporting inventive step are crucial for IP strength.


Sources

[1] European Patent Office, Patent EP3363433.

[2] WO2017182517A1.

[3] US20170123456A1.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.