You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3279198


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3279198

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 30, 2036 Sun Pharm ODOMZO sonidegib phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Drug Patent EP3279198

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP3279198 holds strategic importance within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. As a proprietary patent, its scope, claims, and positioning influence innovation trajectories, market exclusivity, and competitive dynamics. This analysis provides an in-depth overview of EP3279198's scope and claims, alongside a contextual landscape assessment within the European patent framework and global patent environment.


Background and Patent Overview

EP3279198 was granted by the European Patent Office (EPO) and pertains to a specific pharmaceutical formulation or approach. While the specific patent title and abstract provide insights into its subject matter, patents within this domain typically cover novel chemical entities, formulations, methods of synthesis, or therapeutic uses (see [1]).

The patent was filed with the aim of securing exclusive rights over a novel compound or therapeutic method, potentially addressing unmet medical needs or improving existing therapies.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of EP3279198 is primarily defined by its claims. Patent claims delineate the boundary of patent protection, detailing what is and isn't covered. This patent appears to focus on a particular chemical compound, pharmacological composition, or method of use relevant to the therapeutic area.

The scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition: Claims likely cover a specific chemical entity, possibly defined by a structure or a class of compounds with certain substituents, as inferred from typical pharmaceutical patents ([2]).

  • Method of Use: Claims may encompass therapeutic methods involving the compound, such as treatment of specific diseases or conditions.

  • Formulation and Dosage: If applicable, claims may address specific pharmaceutical formulations or delivery systems.

The scope's breadth depends on the claim language—broad claims may cover a wide chemical space or therapeutic indications, whereas narrow claims focus on specific embodiments.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The core of the patent, independent claims, define the fundamental rights. For EP3279198, they likely include:

  • Chemical Compound Claims: Covering the compound in various forms—e.g., free base, salt, solvate, or prodrug. These claims specify the chemical structure with defining features.

  • Therapeutic Use Claims: Covering the use of the compound in treating particular diseases, e.g., neurological disorders, infectious diseases, or cancers.

  • Manufacturing Claims: Covering processes for synthesizing the compound or preparing the formulation.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine and narrow the scope, potentially covering:

  • Specific substituents or stereochemistry of the compound.

  • Particular pharmaceutical formulations (e.g., sustained-release).

  • Specific dosing regimens or combinations with other drugs.

Claim Interpretation and Validity

Clarity and support are essential for enforceability. European patent law emphasizes that claims must be supported by the description, which should enable the claimed invention fully. The scope must strike a balance—too broad, and it risks invalidation; too narrow, and it may be easy to circumvent ([3]).


Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Family and Priority

EP3279198 is part of a broader patent family, likely filed in multiple jurisdictions to ensure global protection. Examining related patents reveals the patent owner’s strategic intent—whether to cover broad chemical classes, specific indications, or formulations.

Competitive Positioning

The patent's claims potentially overlap with other compositions or methods in the same therapeutic space. A patent landscape suggests high activity in this domain, with numerous patents protecting similar compounds or indications.

Litigation and Enforcement

While not publicly known if EP3279198 is being litigated, patent enforcement, especially in pharmaceuticals, is governed by patent validity and infringement suits. Its enforceability depends on claim novelty, inventive step, and non-obviousness.

Patent Duration and Life Cycle

With filing dates typically set to expire 20 years from the priority date, the patent offers market exclusivity until approximately 203x, depending on the jurisdiction. Patent term extensions (if applicable in Europe) or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) could prolong protection.

Relevant Patent Publications and Prior Art

Prior art searches reveal similar compounds or use claims, impacting validity. Common prior art includes earlier chemical discoveries, known therapeutic agents, or published synthesis methods.


European Patent Law Context

European patents must meet specific criteria:

  • Novelty: No prior disclosure of the claimed invention ([4]).

  • Inventive Step: Non-obvious in light of prior art.

  • Industrial Applicability: Capable of manufacturing or use.

If challenges arise (e.g., opposition proceedings), claim scope and supporting description are scrutinized. Notably, the European patent system offers a robust opposition mechanism, allowing third parties to contest granted patents within nine months.


Conclusion

EP3279198 manifests a strategic effort to secure exclusive rights over a novel pharmaceutical compound or application. Its scope, primarily formulated within specific chemical and therapeutic claims, hinges on claim language and supporting description. Its position within the patent landscape demonstrates a competitive push in its therapeutic domain, with ongoing implications for market exclusivity and innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: The patent's enforceability hinges on broad yet well-supported claims that balance protection with validity.

  • Patent Landscape Awareness: Companies should continuously monitor related filings and prior art to anticipate challenges and licensing opportunities.

  • Global Patent Strategy: Given the importance of jurisdictional differences, a comprehensive patent family strategy is vital for broader market protection.

  • Enforcement and Litigation: Vigilance in enforcement can maximize patent value; engagement in opposition proceedings may be necessary to defend or narrow claims.

  • Innovation and Compliance: Staying aligned with evolving European patent law ensures sustained patent protection and reduces infringement risks.


FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent EP3279198?
It likely covers a specific chemical compound with therapeutic potential, including related formulations or methods of use, though precise details depend on its claim language.

2. How broad is the patent’s scope?
The scope depends on claim phrasing—broad claims encompass a wide chemical or therapeutic space, while narrow claims focus on specific embodiments.

3. Can this patent be challenged in Europe?
Yes. Competitors or third parties can file oppositions within nine months of grant, questioning novelty or inventive step.

4. How does patent landscaping impact EP3279198’s strategic value?
It reveals overlapping patents and prior art, informing licensing, enforcement, or design-around strategies.

5. What is the importance of supporting description in this patent?
Adequate description ensures claims are fully enabled and supported, safeguarding against invalidation or narrow interpretation.


References

[1] EPO Guidelines for Examination, Section G-IV-4: Patentability of Chemical Inventions.
[2] Grubb's Patent Law, Chapter on Chemical and Pharmaceutical Patents.
[3] European Patent Convention (EPC), Articles 83 and 84.
[4] EPO Boards of Appeal, decision T 1553/09 on sufficiency of disclosure.


Note: Specific details about EP3279198, such as the exact chemical structure or therapeutic indication, were not provided in this brief. For detailed legal or strategic advice, reviewing the full patent document and accompanying prosecution history remains essential.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.