You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2922528


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2922528

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 18, 2033 Almirall ACZONE dapsone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for EPO Patent EP2922528

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP2922528, titled "Method for producing an immunogenic composition," pertains to a biopharmaceutical invention focused on vaccine formulation technology. Filed by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals S.A., the patent showcases innovations aimed at enhancing immunogenicity, stability, and manufacturing efficiency. As a critical component of vaccine development, this patent's scope and claims significantly influence the patent landscape surrounding vaccine adjuvants and immunogenic compositions.

This analysis delves into the patent's scope, examining the breadth of claims, their legal and technical boundaries, and positioning within the existing patent environment. The examination offers insights useful for competitors, licensors, and legal professionals engaged in vaccine technology, adjuvants, or related biologics.


Overview of the Patent Document

EP2922528 was filed on September 22, 2014, with a priority date of September 20, 2013, and was granted on March 19, 2015. It encompasses methods for producing immunogenic compositions, particularly vaccines comprising specific adjuvants and stabilizers designed to improve immune responses.

The core inventive concept involves a manufacturing process that involves the incorporation of certain adjuvants within a specific matrix, resulting in a composition that demonstrates enhanced immunogenicity and stability.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claims Structure and Hierarchy

The patent contains independent claims and multiple dependent claims. Key aspects focus on:

  • The composition—including components such as antigenic substances, adjuvants, stabilizers, and excipients.
  • The method of manufacturing, especially involving specific steps like formulation, mixing sequences, and processing conditions.
  • The use of the composition for inducing an immune response.

2. Core Independent Claims

The main independent claim (Claim 1) broadly covers:

A method for producing an immunogenic composition comprising:

  • (a) providing an antigenic component,
  • (b) incorporating an adjuvant component, and
  • (c) forming a stabilized composition through specific process steps ensuring enhanced immunogenicity and stability.

Claim 1's language emphasizes a process rather than a static composition, positioning the patent's scope toward manufacturing techniques. It explicitly mentions particular adjuvants (e.g., oil-in-water emulsions, toll-like receptor agonists) and stabilizers (e.g., polysaccharides or specific excipient combinations).

Subsequent claims narrow the scope, specifying:

  • Types of adjuvants (e.g., AS01-like emulsions).
  • The nature of antigens (e.g., protein-based, polysaccharide-based).
  • Processing conditions (e.g., temperature, pH, mixing methods).
  • Stabilizer composition specifics, such as concentration ranges and molecular characteristics.

3. Scope of the Claims

a. Technical Breadth

The patent claims a broad scope in the manufacturing methodology, covering various adjuvant types and stabilizer combinations, which could include:

  • Oil/water emulsion-based adjuvants.
  • Saponin-containing adjuvants (e.g., QS-21 derivatives).
  • Lipid-based formulations.
  • Use of heterologous stabilizers to prevent antigen degradation.

This breadth aims to encompass multiple vaccine formulations, including but not limited to, those used for infectious diseases like influenza, herpes zoster, or COVID-19 (noting the timeline and frequent use of such adjuvants in these vaccines).

b. Limitations and Narrowing

Dependent claims constrain the scope by specifying:

  • Precise adjuvant compositions.
  • Specific process parameters.
  • Exemplary antigen types.

Such narrowing aims to reinforce patent robustness and limit potential challenges.


Patent Landscape and Related Art

1. Prior Patents and Art

The patent landscape features numerous vaccine-related patents, particularly in adjuvant technology:

  • US6472509 (Lublin et al., McGill University): Focused on oil-in-water emulsions with QS-21.
  • WO2012106829 (GSK): Similar formulations involving immunostimulatory compositions.
  • EP2670111 (GSK): Also involves stabilized vaccine formulations with adjuvants.

EP2922528 builds upon this art by emphasizing manufacturing processes to improve immunogenic properties.

2. Patent Family and Overlapping Rights

EP2922528 is part of GSK’s extensive patent family protecting adjuvant and vaccine formulation technologies. Similar patents focus on compositions and methods for enhancing stability and immune response, causing a dense cluster around vaccine adjuvant innovations.

Potential overlaps exist with patents covering lipid-based adjuvants, specific stabilizers, and manufacturing methods. Notably, some prior art restricts the scope of claims related to specific adjuvant types, which the current patent attempts to navigate through process claims and broad composition definitions.

3. Competitive Environment

Major players include GSK, Sanofi, Moderna, and Pfizer, actively patenting vaccine adjuvants and production methods. GSK’s patents emphasize emulsified adjuvants and stabilized formulations, leading to a competitive advantage in vaccine technology.


Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Strong claim breadth allows GSK to defend against competitors producing similar formulations or manufacturing methods, especially given the focus on processes.
  • Potential challenges could target the novelty and inventive step—particularly whether the manufacturing process is sufficiently inventive over prior art like US6472509.
  • Patent stalemates may arise where prior art discloses similar adjuvants but not the specific processing methods claimed.

Conclusion and Industry Outlook

EP2922528's scope strategically encompasses the production of stabilized, immunogenic vaccine compositions with specific process steps that improve immunogenicity and shelf-life. This patent signifies GSK’s effort to protect key manufacturing innovations alongside composition claims, effectively covering a broad spectrum of vaccine formulations.

Given ongoing innovations in vaccine adjuvants and manufacturing, the patent landscape remains competitive, with overlapping patents prompting strategic licensing or cross-licensing agreements for market access and R&D freedom.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Process Claims: The patent emphasizes manufacturing techniques, which are critical in protecting commercial vaccine production methods. Companies must scrutinize process patents to avoid infringement.
  • Composition and Method Overlap: The combination of composition claims with process claims enhances patent strength but also raises validity challenges based on prior art.
  • Navigating the Patent Landscape: Developers working in vaccine adjuvants should analyze existing patents for overlaps, especially in emulsions and stabilizers, to inform R&D and licensing strategies.
  • Innovation Focus: Emphasis on stability and immunogenicity improvements underscores the importance of manufacturing advancements in vaccine efficacy.
  • Legal Vigilance: Regular patent landscape analysis is essential to mitigate infringement risks, especially given the dense patent environment surrounding adjuvant technologies.

FAQs

1. What is the primary technological focus of EP2922528?
The patent focuses on manufacturing methods for producing stabilized, immunogenic vaccine compositions containing specific adjuvants, emphasizing processes that enhance immune response and stability.

2. How does the scope of claims impact competitors?
Broad process claims can prevent competitors from employing similar manufacturing techniques, while composition claims restrict the use of specific adjuvants and stabilizers. This dual coverage enhances patent defensibility.

3. Are there similar patents in the adjuvant space?
Yes. Several patents, such as US6472509 and other GSK patents, involve oil-in-water emulsions and adjuvant formulations. EP2922528 builds upon and differentiates from these by focusing on manufacturing processes.

4. What challenges could be raised against this patent?
Challengers may argue that the manufacturing process lacks inventive step if it closely resembles prior art, or that the claims are overly broad and lack novelty.

5. How does this patent influence innovation in vaccine technology?
It incentivizes process improvements that enhance stability and immunogenicity, fostering innovation in vaccine formulation and manufacture, especially for challenging antigens.


Sources

  1. European Patent Office, EP2922528 details and legal status.
  2. Prior art documents US6472509 and WO2012106829.
  3. GSK patent family publications on vaccine adjuvants.
  4. Industry reports on vaccine adjuvant patent landscapes.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.