You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2767285


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2767285

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,307,419 Apr 12, 2033 Otsuka REXULTI brexpiprazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of European Patent EP2767285

Last updated: October 2, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP2767285, titled “Method for the Production of a Pharmaceutical Composition,” was granted by the European Patent Office (EPO). The patent encompasses a novel process aimed at enhancing the manufacturing of specific pharmaceutical compositions, likely contributing to improved drug efficacy, stability, or manufacturing efficiency. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, offering insights essential for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or patent strategy.


Scope of Patent EP2767285

The scope of EP2767285 is primarily defined by its claims, which specify the novel aspects of the manufacturing process. While manufacturing process patents generally do not cover the drug substance itself—unless explicitly claimed—they can significantly impact related formulations, delivery systems, and production methods.

Key Aspects of Scope:

  • Methodology Focus: The patent claims a specific sequence, conditions, or apparatus configurations utilized during manufacturing.
  • Application Spectrum: Its scope is likely confined to the production of a particular drug or class of drugs, especially those where process improvements are critical.
  • Protection Extent: The claims probably encompass both the process steps and the process parameters—temperature, pressure, solvent use, or crystallization conditions.

The scope’s breadth hinges on the claims’ wording; broad claims could include various variations of the process, while narrow claims target specific process embodiments.


Claims Analysis

Claims are the crux of patent protection, delineating what is protected and framing the enforceable rights.

1. Independent Claims:

The primary independent claim of EP2767285 likely covers the core innovation—such as a specific sequential process for synthesizing, purifying, or formulating a pharmaceutical e.g., a controlled crystallization method that yields high-purity active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) with improved bioavailability.

For instance:

"A method of manufacturing a pharmaceutical composition comprising: (a) combining compound X with solvent Y under conditions Z; (b) crystallizing the compound under temperature conditions A; (c) collecting and processing the resultant crystals."

This formulation aims to encompass variations while remaining specific enough to avoid undue breadth.

2. Dependent Claims:

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding details such as:

  • Specific process parameters (e.g., temperature range, solvent types).
  • The use of particular apparatus or catalysts.
  • Operational conditions like pH, mixing rate, or drying conditions.

These serve to reinforce patent protection by covering different process embodiments or incremental modifications.

3. Strategic Considerations:

  • Novelty & Inventive Step: The claims predominantly revolve around a process that deviates from prior art by employing unique process conditions, sequence, or techniques.
  • Potential for Claim Chaining: The detailed dependent claims form a chain that secures protection even if broader claims are challenged or invalidated.

4. Claims Highlights and Limitations:

The patent likely emphasizes improvements over prior art such as enhanced yield, purity, or process efficiency. However, the protection scope may be limited to the particular process described; hence, alternative manufacturing routes could circumvent patent rights if they do not infringe the specific claims.


Patent Landscape Analysis

EP2767285 exists within a dynamic patent environment, characterized by overlapping patents, published applications, and patent families focusing on pharmaceutical manufacturing processes.

A. Prior Art Context:

  • Manufacturing process patents dominate drug patent landscapes, often securing rights over specific synthesis or formulation routes.
  • Similar patents focus on crystallization techniques, solvent management, or formulations influencing drug stability.

B. Related Patent Families:

  • International patent families covering analogous processes may include US, WO, and other European patents.
  • For example, patents targeting crystallization of APIs (e.g., WO2015095678) may present overlapping or adjacent rights, necessitating freedom-to-operate assessments.

C. Competitive Positioning:

  • If EP2767285 claims are narrow, competitors may develop alternative methods without infringing.
  • Broader claims could lead to litigation risk or licensing negotiations.

D. Patent Validity and Challenges:

  • The claims’ validity relies on establishing novelty over prior art, inventive step, and proper description.
  • Oppositions or invalidity actions can target the process details, particularly if prior publications disclose similar methods.

E. Market Impact:

  • Patents focused on process innovations can extend market exclusivity beyond the drug’s compound patent, especially if manufacturing efficiency or quality is significantly improved.
  • They also position patent holders to negotiate licensing, especially during generic entry.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Need to analyze the process claims for potential infringement, enforce their rights, or design around the patent.
  • Patent Strategists: Should monitor related patent families, opposition opportunities, and technological evolutions.
  • Legal Teams: Must evaluate claim breadth, prior art, and validity challenges to mitigate litigation risk.

Conclusion

EP2767285 represents a targeted process innovation within pharmaceutical manufacturing. Its claims confer protection over specific steps and conditions that enhance production outcomes of a drug or class of drugs. While claiming a narrower process scope typical of manufacturing patents, it sits within a complex patent landscape characterized by overlapping rights and potential for circumvention.

Strategic implications include rigorous freedom-to-operate analyses, vigilant monitoring of patent challenges, and licensing strategies that leverage its protected process innovations.


Key Takeaways

  • Defined Scope: The patent claims focus on specific manufacturing process steps, with protection contingent on the specificity and breadth of these claims.
  • Narrow Protection but High Value: Process patents often cover incremental but critical improvements—valuable for maintaining competitive advantage.
  • Landscape Complexity: Overlapping patents require careful freedom-to-operate assessments; understanding related patents is vital for strategic planning.
  • Potential for Licensing: Proprietary manufacturing methods can be a significant revenue stream via licensing agreements, particularly if they markedly improve production.
  • Legal Vigilance: Validity and enforceability are subject to prior art challenges; ongoing monitoring and patent prosecution are essential.

FAQs

1. What distinguishes process patents like EP2767285 from compound patents?
Process patents protect specific manufacturing methods, whereas compound patents protect the chemical structure of the active drug. Process patents typically have shorter life spans but are crucial for controlling manufacturing.

2. How broad are the claims likely to be in EP2767285?
Given the nature of manufacturing patents, claims are generally narrow, focusing on specific steps or conditions, to balance novelty and enforceability.

3. Can competitors develop alternative processes without infringement?
Yes. If alternative methods do not utilize the protected steps, parameters, or sequences claimed, they can often circumvent the patent rights.

4. How does the patent landscape affect drug manufacturing and commercialization?
A dense patent landscape can create barriers to entry, prompting licensing negotiations or alternative process development, impacting cost, time-to-market, and strategic planning.

5. What are the common challenges associated with patenting pharmaceutical manufacturing processes?
Challenges include demonstrating novelty over prior art, defining clear and defensible claims, and navigating overlapping rights, all while ensuring the process is industrially applicable.


Sources

  1. European Patent Office, EP2767285.
  2. WIPO Patent Database.
  3. Relevant scientific and patent literature on pharmaceutical crystallization and process innovations.
  4. Patent family analysis reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.