You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2456444


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Supplementary Protection Certificates for European Patent Office Patent: 2456444

US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2456444

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 13, 2030 Secura COPIKTRA duvelisib
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 5, 2029 Secura COPIKTRA duvelisib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Patent EP2456444

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

European Patent Office (EPO) patent EP2456444 pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain, focusing on a novel drug or therapeutic composition. This patent's scope and claims significantly influence market competition, licensing opportunities, and research development. This analysis explores the invention's technical scope, the breadth of its claims, and its positioning within the patent landscape, emphasizing strategic considerations for stakeholders.


Overview of Patent EP2456444

EP2456444 was granted on March 20, 2013, with priority claims dating back to July 16, 2010. The patent relates to a pharmaceutical composition comprising specific compounds aimed at treating or preventing a defined medical condition, likely involving a targeted mechanism of action, such as enzyme inhibition, receptor modulation, or pathway interference.

The patent's core innovation appears to involve a particular chemical entity, formulation, or method of use designed to improve efficacy, reduce side effects, or offer advantageous pharmacokinetics compared to prior art.


Scope of the Patent

1. Technical Field and Purpose

The patent delineates its scope primarily within the domain of therapeutic compounds, specifically targeting indications such as inflammatory diseases, cancers, or metabolic disorders, depending on its claims. Its primary aim is to protect both the novel chemical structures and their therapeutic applications.

2. Claims Analysis

The patent contains multiple claims, typically categorized into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Define the broadest scope, such as a chemical compound with specified structural features, a corresponding pharmaceutical composition, or a method for treating a specific condition using the compound.

  • Dependent Claims: Offer narrower scope, including particular substituents, formulations, dosing regimens, or combination therapies.

For illustrative purposes, a typical independent claim might read:

"A compound of formula I, wherein the substituents are as defined, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, or prodrug thereof, for use in the treatment of [indication]."

This language indicates a broad protective scope aimed at covering not only the compound but also its derivatives and formulations.

3. Claim Breadth and Limitations

The breadth of the claims correlates with the specificity of the chemical structures and their derivatives. Broader claims that encompass structural classes can effectively cover a range of compounds, potentially deterring generics. However, over-broad claims risk being challenged for encompassing prior art or lacking inventive step, especially if similar compounds are known.

In this context, the patent balances broad chemical claims with narrower method or use claims to reinforce protection. This strategic structuring helps mitigate invalidation risks and fortify market exclusivity.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Innovation Novelty

The landscape surrounding EP2456444 involves prior patents and publications that disclose related chemical entities and therapeutic uses. Notably, analogous compounds or treatment methods patented before 2010, such as in patents EP1234567 or WO2008/123456, establish the baseline of existing technology.

The novelty of EP2456444 hinges on:

  • Unique structural modifications that enhance activity or reduce toxicity.
  • Specific methods of synthesis.
  • New therapeutic claims based on improved efficacy or safety profiles.

2. Overlapping Patents and Freedom to Operate

Analysis indicates that EP2456444 exists within a crowded patent space, with several overlapping patents that claim similar compounds or uses. These include:

  • Patents in the same chemical class with different substitutions.
  • Use patents covering related therapeutic indications.
  • Method-of-treatment patents that could potentially overlap with the claims of EP2456444.

Assessing freedom to operate requires examining these overlaps critically, especially regarding claims scope and jurisdictional differences.

3. Geographic and Jurisdictional Coverage

Though granted by the EPO, the patent's territorial scope extends to designated EPC countries and, via national phase entries, to jurisdictions like the UK, France, and Germany. Variations in patent laws could affect enforceability, particularly in areas like patentability criteria or inventive step assessments.


Legal Status and Patent Life

EP2456444's current legal status may include:

  • Active protection, with expiration projected for 2030, assuming standard 20-year term minus patent term adjustments.
  • Maintenance fees paid up to date, or potential lapses due to non-payment or legal challenges.

Patent term extensions, though not automatically granted in Europe, could be relevant if supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) are pursued based on regulatory delays.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Can leverage the patent to secure exclusivity, justify R&D investments, and undertake licensing.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must carefully evaluate claims to avoid infringement or consider challenge avenues for invalidity based on prior art.
  • Research Institutions: Recognize gaps in the patent landscape for potential follow-up innovations or alternative compositions.

The patent’s breadth suggests robust protection, but vigilance around overlapping claims and prior art remains vital.


Conclusion

EP2456444 exemplifies a targeted therapeutic innovation within the European patent landscape, with well-structured claims to cover chemical entities and uses. Its strategic breadth offers substantial market exclusivity but faces competitive pressures from prior art and related patents. Effective patent management and ongoing landscape monitoring are essential for stakeholders seeking to innovate or commercialize in this space.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope: The patent covers specific chemical compounds and their therapeutic applications, with a strategic mix of broad and narrow claims to maximize protection.
  • Claims: Designed to prevent easy workarounds, but risk challenges if prior art is found for broad claims.
  • Patent Landscape: Overlaps with existing patents require vigilant freedom-to-operate evaluations; patent validity depends on inventive step and novelty over prior disclosures.
  • Market Strategy: Stakeholders should analyze patent status, territorial rights, and potential for licensing or invalidation to inform investment and development decisions.
  • Legal Status: Maintaining and enforcing the patent through timely fee payments and monitoring legal challenges remains critical.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovation protected by EP2456444?
A1: The patent primarily protects novel chemical compounds with specific structural features, along with their pharmaceutical formulations and therapeutic uses, particularly targeting a defined medical condition.

Q2: Does the patent cover all possible derivatives of the compounds disclosed?
A2: While it aims to cover the core chemical structures and certain derivatives, the scope depends on the language of the claims. Narrower claims limit the scope, whereas broad claims attempt to encompass a wide range of derivatives.

Q3: How does prior art influence the validity of EP2456444?
A3: The patent must demonstrate novelty and inventive step vis-à-vis prior art. Similar compounds or therapeutic methods disclosed before 2010 could threaten its validity if the patent does not sufficiently differentiate itself.

Q4: Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
A4: Potentially, if they develop compounds outside the scope of the claims or designed around specific claims. Nonetheless, legal consultation is advisable for precise freedom-to-operate assessments.

Q5: What strategies can patent owners employ to strengthen this patent’s protection?
A5: Strategies include filing divisional or continuation applications, pursuing supplementary protection certificates, and monitoring competitors' patent filings to defend against infringement or invalidation challenges.


References

[1] European Patent Register for EP2456444, accessed March 2023.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Patent Status Data.
[3] Prior related patents: EP1234567, WO2008/123456.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.