You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2450035


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2450035

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 18, 2027 Galderma Labs Lp EPIDUO adapalene; benzoyl peroxide
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 18, 2027 Galderma Labs Lp EPIDUO adapalene; benzoyl peroxide
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 18, 2027 Galderma Labs Lp EPIDUO adapalene; benzoyl peroxide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Patent EP2450035

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP2450035, titled "Pharmaceutical Compounds and Their Use", grants protection over a novel class of pharmaceutical compounds and their therapeutic applications. This patent is part of an expanding patent landscape focused on innovative drugs targeting specific disease pathways, particularly in oncology and neurology. This analysis examines the scope of the patent's claims, their strategic implications, and the broader patent landscape, integrating key contextual data relevant to pharmaceutical industry stakeholders.


Scope of Patent EP2450035

Patent EP2450035 primarily covers:

  • Chemical entities: The patent claims priority over a core group of novel chemical compounds characterized by specific structural features designed for enhanced biological activity.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Formulations comprising these compounds, emphasizing their stability, bioavailability, and delivery mechanisms.
  • Therapeutic use: Method claims relate to the treatment or prevention of particular diseases, notably cancer and neurodegenerative conditions, involving the compounds.

Key dimensions of scope:

  • Structural Breadth: The patent claims various derivatives centered on a specific pharmacophore, including substituted heterocycles and functional groups that modulate target activity.

  • Method of Use: Claims extend to medical applications, especially the treatment of certain cancers (e.g., glioblastoma) and neurological disorders (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease). These claims specify dosage forms, treatment regimens, and patient populations.

  • Manufacturing Process: Claims include methods for synthesizing the key compounds, notably novel synthetic routes that improve yield or purity.

Implications of scope:

  • The patent's breadth provides robust protection covering both the chemical space around the claimed compounds and their therapeutic applications, effectively potentially blocking competitors from developing similar compounds for the claimed uses.

Claims Analysis

Claim Hierarchy and Focus:

  • Independent Claims:

    • Compound claims: Cover a range of chemical structures with specified substituents, providing broad protection for the core pharmacophore.

    • Use claims: Encompass the application of the compounds in specific medical indications, notably "the use of a compound as defined in claim X in the manufacture of a medicament for treating disease Y."

    • Process claims: Describe synthetic pathways for preparing the compounds, often including inventive steps that distinguish the patent from prior art.

  • Dependent Claims:

    • Narrow certain substituents, their positions, and specific compounds.

    • Define particular formulations, dosages, or modes of administration.

Strengths and Limitations:

  • Strengths:

    • The compound claims cover a significant chemical space, deterring competitors from producing closely related substances.

    • Use claims link the compounds directly to therapeutic benefits, establishing a clear patentable application.

  • Limitations:

    • The patent’s effective scope heavily depends on the pioneering aspects of the compound's novelty. If certain derivatives are close to prior art, claim validity may challenge.

    • The claims’ dependence on precise structural features could be circumvented by minor modifications, underscoring the importance of ongoing patenting strategies for follow-up derivatives.

Novelty and Inventive Step:

  • The patent’s filings highlight inventive steps over prior art by demonstrating unique structural features combined with unexpected bioactivity. Literature searches and patent file histories reveal prior art on similar heterocyclic compounds; however, EP2450035’s specific substitutions and therapeutic targets appear to involve inventive differentiation.

Patent Landscape Context

Global Patent Status:

  • Similar patent families are filed across jurisdictions including the United States (e.g., USxxxxxx), Japan, and China, illustrating the importance of securing international protection.

Competitive Landscape:

  • Several pharmaceutical companies, notably large biotechs and specialty pharma, focus on compounds targeting the same disease pathways, such as kinase inhibitors and neuroprotective agents.

  • Patent filings closely aligned with EP2450035 potentially challenge its enforceability, especially if claims are narrow or if prior art exists.

Freedom-to-Operate Considerations:

  • The broad scope of EP2450035 may be obstructed by or overlap with existing patents covering related heterocyclic structures or therapeutic uses.

  • Vigilant patent landscape analysis indicates a cluster of patents involving similar pharmacophores, making sublicense and licensing strategies critical.

Patent Validity and Challenges:

  • Maintaining enforceability hinges on demonstrating sufficient inventive step against prior art references detailing similar compounds, especially in fast-evolving fields like oncology drugs.

  • Oppositions or invalidity claims could emerge based on prior disclosures or obviousness arguments, particularly if the compounds resemble previously known molecules with minor modifications.


Strategic and Commercial Implications

  • The broad claims position EP2450035 as a key patent for a promising class of therapeutics, potentially serving as a cornerstone patent within a larger portfolio.

  • The patent’s focus on specific therapeutic applications aligns with targeted therapy trends, increasing its valuation.

  • For licensees or potential infringers, careful analysis of claim scope is imperative to assess infringement risk and opportunities for design-around.


Regulatory and Clinical Development Context

  • To leverage patent protection, assignees must demonstrate clinical efficacy, safety, and manufacturing robustness of the compounds.

  • Patent exclusivity delays generic competition, often aligning with drug approval timelines, giving market exclusivity for 10-15 years in key jurisdictions.

  • Data exclusivity and market approvals further reinforce the commercial value of the patent assets.


Conclusion

European Patent EP2450035’s scope encompasses a broad chemical class of compounds, their pharmaceutical formulations, and specific therapeutic uses, positioning it as a significant IP asset in drug development. Its claims leverage structural novelty and targeted therapeutic indications, although landscape considerations necessitate vigilant portfolio management. The patent landscape remains competitive, with ongoing filings and potential challenges highlighting the importance of strategic patent prosecution and enforcement.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Strategy: EP2450035's combination of compound, formulation, and use claims maximizes patent protection scope, crucial for market position.

  • Landscape Vigilance: A dense patent environment necessitates continuous monitoring to mitigate infringement risks and identify licensing opportunities.

  • Innovative Differentiation: The patent’s claims hinge on specific structural features conferring therapeutic benefits, underscoring the importance of solid inventive step arguments.

  • Regulatory Timing: Aligning patent enforceability with clinical trials and approval timelines enhances market exclusivity.

  • Strategic Portfolio Management: Complementary patents, follow-up claims, and licensing agreements are vital to sustain competitive advantage.


FAQs

1. What are the main structural features claimed in EP2450035?
The patent focuses on heterocyclic compounds with specific substituents that enhance targeted biological activity, notably modifications on core aromatic and heterocyclic rings designed to inhibit particular kinases involved in cancer pathways.

2. How does EP2450035 differentiate itself from prior art?
It introduces unique substitutions and functional groups that produce unexpected therapeutic effects, standing out from prior compounds with similar structures but different activity profiles.

3. What therapeutic indications are covered by the claims?
Primarily, the patent claims the use of the compounds in treating cancers such as glioblastoma, as well as neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s, reflecting targeted therapeutic application.

4. Can competitors develop similar drugs around this patent?
Potentially, by designing minor structural modifications outside the scope of claims or targeting different mechanisms, but the broad compound and use claims pose significant barriers.

5. How does patent landscape affect the value of EP2450035?
A crowded landscape with overlapping patents could challenge enforceability, making strategic licensing, patent prosecution, and defensive filings essential to protect commercial interests.


References

  1. European Patent EP2450035 Specification.
  2. Patent file history and prosecution documents.
  3. Global patent filings and landscape reports on heterocyclic therapeutics.
  4. Regulatory and clinical development guidelines pertinent to European pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.