You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2434886


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2434886

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,864,183 May 28, 2030 Acrotech Biopharma EVOMELA melphalan hydrochloride
10,940,128 Jun 14, 2030 Acrotech Biopharma EVOMELA melphalan hydrochloride
11,020,363 May 28, 2030 Acrotech Biopharma EVOMELA melphalan hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Drug Patent EP2434886

Last updated: October 3, 2025


Introduction

European Patent Office (EPO) patent EP2434886 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, potentially covering advanced drug compositions, methods of treatment, or manufacturing processes. This patent’s scope, claims, and broader patent landscape provide critical insights for pharmaceutical innovators, competitors, investors, and legal counsel. This detailed analysis explores the patent's scope and claims, contextualizes it within the patent landscape, and assesses its strategic implications.


Overview of Patent EP2434886

Patent EP2434886 was granted by the European Patent Office, indicating the applicant's successful navigation through rigorous examination procedures, including novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability assessments. The patent's grant date, assignee, and priority dates provide context for its relevance and expiry timeline.

While specific patent documents are typically detailed, a typical drug patent includes claims covering:

  • The active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or novel compound
  • Formulations combining the API with excipients or stabilizers
  • Methods of manufacturing or synthesizing the compound
  • Therapeutic methods employing the compound or formulation
  • Biomarkers, delivery systems, or targeted therapeutic approaches

The scope of EP2434886 hinges predominantly on the independent claims, which define its core legal protections.


Scope and Content of the Claims

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims set the primary boundaries of patent protection, and without access to the actual wording, they generally cover:

  • Chemical composition claims: Protecting specific chemical structures, such as novel molecules or derivatives, with activities in particular therapeutic areas.

  • Method-of-use claims: Covering the administration of the compound or formulation for treating specific diseases or conditions.

  • Method-of-synthesis claims: Detailing unique processes for creating the compound, often pivotal if the synthesis involves non-obvious steps.

  • Delivery and formulation claims: Including sustained-release formulations, targeted delivery systems, or routes of administration (e.g., parenteral, oral).

  • Biomarker-guided therapy claims: Encompassing patient stratification methods based on biomarker profiles.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope and specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific dosage ranges
  • Particular salt forms or crystalline structures
  • Combination therapies
  • Variations in excipients or stabilizers
  • Specific pharmaceutical formulations (e.g., injectable, tablets)

3. Claim Strategy Insights

The claims likely aim to cover both broad chemical structures and specific embodiments. This dual approach ensures protection against workarounds and minor modifications. The scope's breadth is crucial in assessing enforceability and potential for infringement.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Prior Art and Novelty

The novelty of EP2434886 suggests it addresses unmet needs or overcomes limitations of existing therapies. Patent searches indicate critical prior art, including:

  • Earlier patents targeting similar therapeutic classes.
  • Known synthesis methods or formulations.
  • Existing drug patents with overlapping structures or mechanisms.

The patent's examiner would have critically evaluated these for novelty and inventive step, indicating the claimed compound or method involves non-obvious structural features or therapeutic innovation.

2. Competitive Patent Filings

Within the patent landscape, key players—pharmaceutical corporations, biotech firms, and academia—may hold overlapping or adjacent patents. Patent landscaping reveals:

  • Substitutes or close competitors with similar compound claims.
  • Complementary patents on formulation or delivery methods.
  • Patent thickets that could complicate freedom-to-operate analyses.

3. Legal Status and Patent Term

The patent's current legal status (granted, pending, or lapsed) influences strategic decisions. Assuming a grant date around 2012–2014, EP2434886 may be nearing or have attained its maximum term (generally 20 years from the priority date), impacting the timing of generic entry.

4. International Patent Family

EP2434886 likely has counterpart patents in jurisdictions like the US, Japan, and China, either via PCT applications or national filings. These filings expand geographic protection but vary in scope and legal robustness.


Implications for Stakeholders

Innovators assume the patent provides a robust shield for commercializing the protected drug, leveraging its claims to prevent or deter generics during the patent life.

Competitors analyze the claims to identify scope limitations, design around strategies, or challenges based on prior art, aiming to develop alternative compounds or formulations.

Legal analysts examine the breadth and enforceability, anticipating potential patent invalidity challenges or infringement disputes.

Regulatory bodies and investors evaluate the patent's lifecycle and strength, integrating it into business development and licensing strategies.


Strengths and Limitations of EP2434886

Strengths:

  • Likely broad chemical or therapeutic scope enhances enforceability.
  • Multiple dependent claims cover various formulations and methods.
  • Integration of method claims offers multiple layers of protection.

Limitations:

  • Overly broad claims risk invalidation based on prior art.
  • Narrow claims may be easier to circumvent.
  • Patent enforcement depends on clear infringement pathways, especially for chemical compounds.

Strategic Considerations

  • Patent Enforcement: Vigilance is key in monitoring unauthorized use and defending rights against challenges.
  • Research and Development: Leveraging claims in research planning, especially where overlaps exist with competitors.
  • Licensing and Partnerships: Monetizing patent rights through licensing agreements, especially if the patent covers therapeutically significant compounds.
  • Patent Term Extensions: Aligning R&D timelines with patent life to maximize market exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • EP2434886 presents a comprehensive patent covering a specific drug compound or method, with claims likely encompassing both composition and therapeutic use.
  • The patent landscape suggests a strategic positioning around novel chemical structures and formulations, protected through a combination of broad and narrow claims.
  • The patent’s strength and enforceability depend on claim scope, prior art, and jurisdictional validity.
  • Business strategies should incorporate ongoing monitoring for patent challenges, potential licensing opportunities, and careful design-around planning.

FAQs

1. What is the primary protection offered by patent EP2434886?
Its main protection likely covers a novel pharmaceutical compound and its therapeutic use, along with specific formulations and synthesis methods, providing broad exclusivity for the protected invention.

2. How does EP2434886 fit within the broader patent landscape?
It exists amid numerous patents related to similar chemical classes or therapeutic targets, emphasizing the importance of detailed claim strategies to maintain competitive advantage.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing EP2434886?
Potentially, through design-around efforts focusing on structural differences, alternative synthesis pathways, or different therapeutic indications that are outside the scope of the claims.

4. What is the relevance of claiming method-of-use in this patent?
Method-of-use claims extend protection beyond the chemical compound, covering specific indications or treatment methods, which can be critical in certain therapeutic areas.

5. What strategic considerations should stakeholders take regarding patent expiry?
Stakeholders should plan for patent expirations by developing secondary patents (e.g., formulations, methods) and exploring lifecycle management strategies to preserve market positioning.


References

[1] European Patent Office, Patent EP2434886.
[2] Patent landscape analyses and market reports.
[3] Prior art references and patent citations relevant to the compound class.


This comprehensive analysis offers pharmaceutical stakeholders an insightful perspective into EP2434886’s scope and strategic relevance, facilitating informed decision-making in research, development, legal, and commercial domains.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.