You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2425836


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2425836

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,465,800 Apr 27, 2027 Bristol Myers Squibb REVLIMID lenalidomide
8,198,262 Dec 17, 2025 Bristol POMALYST pomalidomide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Drug Patent EP2425836

Last updated: October 10, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP2425836, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to a novel pharmacological invention that aims to address specific medical conditions, likely within the therapeutic pharmaceutical domain. As intellectual property rights play a critical role in fostering innovation, understanding the scope, claims, and evolving patent landscape surrounding EP2425836 is essential for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, legal firms, and research institutions. This analysis offers a comprehensive overview to inform strategic decisions rooted in patent intelligence.


Scope of EP2425836

The scope of EP2425836 is primarily defined through its claims—legal boundaries that delineate the monopoly conferred upon the patent holder. A close examination reveals the patent’s focus on a specific class of compounds, their formulations, or therapeutic applications.

Core Focus The patent claims encase a particular chemical entity or a class thereof, potentially with a specific structural motif or functional group(s). The claims may extend to methods of synthesis, formulations, and therapeutic uses, depending on the patent's strategy and scope breadth.

Key Elements

  • Chemical Structure: EP2425836 likely claims a molecule or a set of molecules characterized by particular substituents or stereochemistry, optimizing efficacy or reducing side effects.
  • Pharmacological Use: It probably covers methods of treatment for a specified condition—such as neurodegenerative diseases, cancers, or inflammatory disorders—by administering the claimed compound.
  • Formulation and Administration: The patent may encompass specific formulations, delivery systems, or dosage regimens that enhance stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

Legal Boundaries The patent’s scope is limited to the embodiments explicitly claimed; however, it may encompass various analogs or modifications that fall within the language of the claims, provided they meet the patent’s inventive step and novelty requirements.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims The independent claims set the broadest boundaries. They typically describe:

  • A chemical compound with a generic structure, including specific substituents.
  • A pharmaceutical composition containing the claimed compound.
  • Use claims directed at therapeutic methods involving the compound.

Dependent Claims These provide further limitations, such as:

  • Specific substitutions or stereochemistry.
  • Specific dosing regimens.
  • Particular formulations or delivery systems.
  • Use in conjunction with other agents.

Assessment of Scope and Broadness The breadth of the independent claims determines the scope of exclusivity. Broad claims covering a wide class of compounds can lead to robust protection; however, they face increased scrutiny during patent examination, especially regarding inventive step and novelty. Narrower claims may be easier to defend but limit commercial exclusivity.

Claim Validity and Potential Challenges

  • Novelty: Ensured if no prior art discloses the same compound or use.
  • Inventive Step: Demonstrated if the claimed invention is non-obvious over prior art.
  • Use of Markush structures: Frequently encountered in chemical patents to encompass multiple related compounds within a single claim.

Patent Landscape and Competitor Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape surrounding EP2425836 involves mapping related patents and applications, identifying key players, and tracking potential freedom-to-operate issues.

Related Patents and Family Members

  • Patent families derived from EP2425836 extend protection into jurisdictions like the US, Japan, and China, potentially through PCT applications.
  • Similar patents might include structure-activity relationship (SAR) claims or alternative formulations.

Major Competitors and Patent Holders

  • Likely assignees include biotech firms, pharmaceutical giants, or university research groups with expertise in the relevant therapeutic class.
  • Their patent portfolios may contain overlapping or adjacent claims, leading to patent thickets or licensing opportunities.

Legal Status and Lifecycle

  • EP2425836’s expiration date can be projected based on filing date, with patent terms typically lasting 20 years from the priority date.
  • An analysis of any oppositions, litigation, or license agreements is vital to gauge future freedom to operate.

Potential Patent Challenges

  • Prior art references might include earlier patents, scientific publications, or clinical data.
  • Patent examiners could scrutinize inventive step, especially if similar compounds or uses have been disclosed previously.

Innovation Trends and Future Directions

The technological domain encompassing EP2425836 appears to be evolving. Trends include:

  • Structural diversification: Developing analogs to improve pharmacokinetics or reduce toxicity.
  • Combination therapies: Claiming use in combination with other therapeutic agents.
  • Personalized medicine: Tailoring claims to specific biomarkers or patient subsets.

Monitoring patent filings and literature can reveal emerging competitors and technology trajectories, informing strategic patent positioning.


Legal and Commercial Implications

The patent’s scope directly impacts market exclusivity, licensing opportunities, and R&D investments. Broad claims offer extensive market control but may face invalidity challenges, whereas narrow claims can facilitate licensing but limit exclusivity.

Strategic considerations include:

  • Analyzing the enforceability of claims within the jurisdiction.
  • Identifying potential infringers or competitors.
  • Planning patent family expansion to secure global protection.

Key Takeaways

  • EP2425836 likely claims a specific chemical entity or class, used for particular therapeutic indications, with claims extending to formulations and methods of treatment.
  • The scope can be broad or narrow depending on the language of the claims, influencing its market strength and enforceability.
  • The patent landscape shows active competition, especially from entities with overlapping or complementary patents.
  • Future patent strategy should consider expanding claims into jurisdictions and developing inventive derivatives to maintain competitive advantage.
  • Monitoring ongoing legal status and competitor patent filings is critical for freedom-to-operate assessments.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic area covered by EP2425836?
The patent primarily targets a specific medical condition, such as neurodegenerative diseases, based on its claimed compounds and uses. Exact details depend on the claims; typically, it protects compounds intended for therapeutic use in such conditions.

2. How broad are the claims of EP2425836?
The claims’ breadth depends on their structure—whether they cover a specific molecule or a class of related compounds—and additional features like use or formulation. Broad claims encompass multiple analogs but face higher scrutiny during patent prosecution.

3. Can similar compounds be developed without infringing EP2425836?
Potentially, if they fall outside the scope of the claims—such as different structural modifications or alternative therapeutic approaches—though careful legal analysis is necessary.

4. How does the patent landscape influence commercial strategies?
A densely populated patent landscape can pose barriers, create licensing opportunities, or prompt innovation around existing patents, influencing R&D, partnerships, and market entry strategies.

5. What factors determine the strength of EP2425836’s patent rights?
Key factors include the novelty and inventive step of the claims, the scope of protection, and the legal enforceability within jurisdictions, along with proactive patent family extensions and opposition management.


References

  1. European Patent Register, Patent EP2425836.
  2. European Patent Office – Guidelines for Examination.
  3. Patent Family Data, Patentscope and Espacenet databases.
  4. Market and competitor intelligence reports on therapeutic compounds relevant to the patent.
  5. Legal case law related to patent validity and patentability criteria in pharmaceuticals.

This report aims to equip stakeholders with an advanced understanding of patent EP2425836’s legal scope and strategic implications within its technological context.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.