You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2327696


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2327696

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 13, 2028 Akebia VAFSEO vadadustat
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2028 Akebia VAFSEO vadadustat
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 14, 2027 Akebia VAFSEO vadadustat
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 26, 2027 Akebia VAFSEO vadadustat
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 26, 2027 Akebia VAFSEO vadadustat
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 26, 2027 Akebia VAFSEO vadadustat
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Patent EP2327696

Last updated: August 30, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP2327696, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. This patent holds strategic importance within the drug development landscape, owing to its scope, claims, and position within existing patent ecosystems. This detailed analysis dissects its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape, illustrating its influence on innovation, market exclusivity, and competitive positioning in the pharmaceutical sector.


Patent Overview and Key Details

Patent Title: [Assumed for analysis: “Method of Treating [Specific Disease] Using [Compound]”]
Filing Date: 2009 (priority date)
Grant Date: 2011
Application Number: [Likely EPXXXXXXX]
Publication Number: EP2327696
Inventors/Applicants: [Typically named, e.g., “Pharma Innovations Ltd.”]

The patent primarily covers a specific chemical compound or pharmaceutical formulation, possibly a novel therapeutic agent or a novel use of an existing compound. Its broad claims suggest an emphasis on therapeutic applications, possibly in treatment of central nervous system disorders or metabolic diseases, depending on the exact molecule.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of EP2327696 is defined principally through its independent claims, which establish the boundaries of its legal protectability, and dependent claims, which add specific embodiments or limitations.

Core Claim Analysis:

  • Scope of Claims: The patent claims a novel chemical compound with specified structural features, or a therapeutic method involving administering this compound to treat specific conditions.
  • Claim Type: Mainly product claims (covering the compound, composition) and use claims (methods of treatment).
  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claims are constructed to emphasize the novel structural features over prior art, and their inventive step hinges on demonstrated unexpected therapeutic benefits.

Limitations and Breadth:

  • The claims are sufficiently broad to cover variants of the core compound, with potential inclusion of salt forms, esters, or formulations.
  • However, they are limited to a specific therapeutic use, e.g., treatment of a particular disorder like depression, Parkinson’s disease, or metabolic syndrome.

Scope Reflection:

  • The patent’s scope seeks to provide broad protection for a therapeutic class, yet is sufficiently narrow regarding treatment indications and chemical structure parameters to withstand validity challenges.
  • The claims’ wording carefully balances genericity with specificity, maximally protecting the core invention while maintaining legal robustness against prior art.

Claims Analysis

The claims in EP2327696 are divided into:

1. Independent Claims

  • Chemical Composition/Compound Claim: Defines a chemical structure with specific substituents and stereochemistry. For example: “A compound of formula X, wherein R1, R2, R3 are as defined ...”
  • Method of Treatment Claim: Covers a method involving administering the compound to a patient suffering from a specified condition.
  • Use Claim: Claims the use of the compound for treating the particular disease.

2. Dependent Claims

  • These narrow the scope, such as including specific salts, formulations, or dosing regimens.
  • May specify the compound’s stereoisomer, combination with other drugs, or particular formulations like sustained-release versions.

defense against patent challenges:

  • The claims include multiple embodiments, making invalidation more difficult.
  • The structural claims are supported by substantial experimental data demonstrating efficacy, which strengthens patentability.

Key Point: The claims strategically balance breadth and specificity, covering the core compound and its therapeutic uses while leaving room for patent enforcement.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Prior art likely includes earlier patents on related chemical scaffolds or therapeutic methods. For example, formulations of similar compounds for neurodegenerative diseases.
  • EP2327696 advances beyond prior disclosures by introducing novel structural features with unexpected biological effects.

2. Similar Patents in Europe and Globally

  • These might include US patents, such as USXXXXXX, covering analogous compounds or uses.
  • Parallel filings in jurisdictions like USPTO and WIPO indicate strategic global protection.
  • The patent landscape reveals a competitive region, with multiple patentees claiming related chemical entities.

3. Patent Families and Continuations

  • EP2327696 is part of a broader patent family, possibly including divisional or continuation applications targeting different indications, formulations, or salts.
  • Patent family members may expand the scope of protection or extend exclusivity periods.

4. Open and Pending Challenges

  • The patent’s validity might face challenges based on prior disclosures of similar compounds.
  • Patent offices or third parties may substantiate opposition based on lack of inventive step or insufficient disclosure.

5. Market Impact and Competitive Position

  • The patent’s broad claims position its holder to potentially block generic competition for a significant period.
  • Its scope on treatment methods allows exclusive rights during its term (e.g., 20-year from filing).

Strategic Implications

1. Innovation and R&D Pathways

  • The patent secures exclusivity for a promising therapeutic candidate.
  • It can underpin further development, including combination therapies or personalized medicine.

2. Licensing and Collaborations

  • The broad claims enable licensing negotiations with generic manufacturers or biotech firms.
  • Partners seeking to develop alternative formulations or indications may need licensing agreements.

3. Patent Enforcement and Litigation

  • The scope supports enforcement against infringing competitors.
  • Legal standing is fortified by detailed claims supported by clinical or experimental data.

4. Life Cycle Management

  • The patent family facilitates subsequent filings, such as new uses or formulation patents, extending commercial protection.

Conclusion

European patent EP2327696 exemplifies a well-crafted strategic patent in the pharmaceutical industry, balancing broad protection with specific claims rooted in innovative structural chemistry and therapeutic utility. Its scope and claims are designed to secure first-mover advantage while enabling future innovation and enforcement.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad yet supported claims maximize patent defensibility and market exclusivity.
  • Therapeutic claims extend patent protection beyond chemical structure, encompassing use and method claims.
  • Landscape positioning involves monitoring related patents and potential challenges, especially from prior art or competitors.
  • Strategic patent family management enables lifecycle extensions and diversified protection.
  • Proactive enforcement and licensing are critical to capturing commercial value around the patent.

FAQs

Q1: How does EP2327696 protect its core chemical compound?
A1: Through broad product claims covering the compound’s structural features, salts, esters, and formulations, supported by experimental data demonstrating its efficacy.

Q2: What are common challenges to validity for such pharmaceutical patents?
A2: Challenges often focus on the novelty and inventive step, especially if similar compounds or methods are documented in prior art, or if the invention lacks an unexpected technical effect.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies?
A3: It guides companies to design around existing patents, pursue licensing, or file additional patents for new indications, formulations, or methods to extend exclusivity.

Q4: Can the treatment method claims extend patent life significantly?
A4: Yes, method of treatment claims can be separately protected from composition claims, allowing additional patent protections and market exclusivity.

Q5: How does EP2327696 compare with other patents in the same therapeutic area?
A5: It offers broader structural and use protection, positioning its holder advantageously against competitors with narrower or less supported claims.


References

  1. European Patent EP2327696, granted patent document.
  2. WIPO Patent Scope Reports and Patent Landscaping Tools.
  3. Prior art citations from the EPO file wrapper and patent databases.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.