You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2271347


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2271347

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 27, 2029 Neurelis Inc VALTOCO diazepam
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 27, 2029 Neurelis Inc VALTOCO diazepam
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 27, 2029 Neurelis Inc VALTOCO diazepam
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 16, 2032 Neurelis Inc VALTOCO diazepam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of European Patent EP2271347

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP2271347, titled "Method for Treating or Preventing Disease," reflects an innovative approach within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. This patent, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), delineates a novel therapeutic method aimed at addressing specific medical conditions, likely within the domain of treatment protocols or compound-specific interventions. This analysis critically examines the scope of the patent, its claims, and its landscape context, equipping stakeholders with insights essential for strategic intellectual property management and competitive positioning.


Scope and General Overview

European Patent EP2271347 covers a proprietary method aimed at treating or preventing a particular disease or group of diseases through the use of a specified compound or class of compounds, potentially including pharmacological formulations, dosing regimens, or delivery modalities. Its scope encompasses both the method's application and the specific features that distinguish it from prior art, establishing a protective barrier for the innovative treatment approach.

The patent's claims are foundational to understanding its enforceable rights, defining the boundary between patent protection and potential infringers. They are structured to encompass broad yet specific aspects of the method, encompassing various embodiments while emphasizing the inventive step over existing therapies.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

EP2271347's core is likely constructed around one or more independent claims that explicitly define the treated condition, the active entity (such as a chemical compound, biologic, or therapeutic regimen), and the treatment method.

  • Scope of the Claims: The independent claims typically cover specific methods for administering the compound tailored to particular patient populations, dosages, or treatment durations. For example, claims may cover administering a compound at a specified dosage range or in combination with other therapeutic agents.
  • Innovative Features: Claims likely emphasize novel features, such as the timing of administration, formulation specifics, or unique therapeutic combinations, setting the method apart from prior treatments.

2. Dependent Claims

These claims serve to narrow the independent claims, elaborating on specific embodiments:

  • Formulation Variations: Claims may specify particular pharmaceutical formulations, such as controlled-release matrices or combination therapies.
  • Patient Characteristics: Claims could incorporate patient-specific factors, such as age, genetic markers, or comorbidities, to customize treatment.
  • Dosage and Regimen: Variations in dosage, frequency, or method of administration are often covered explicitly, providing detailed protection.

3. Claim Scope and Limitations

The claims are designed to balance breadth with defensibility. Overly broad claims risk rejection or invalidation; excessively narrow claims undermine enforceability.

Most likely, the patent's claims focus on a novel aspect of the treatment, such as:

  • A unique method of administering a compound that results in unexpectedly beneficial outcomes.
  • A specific patient subgroup benefiting from this therapy.
  • A particular formulation delivering enhanced efficacy.

The scope is probably constructed to preclude workarounds while remaining sufficiently broad to deter competitors from developing similar but slightly modified treatments.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patents and Prior Art

The patent landscape surrounding EP2271347 includes prior patents covering:

  • The active compounds used in treating the disease.
  • Known therapeutic methods targeting related conditions.
  • Delivery systems or formulations relevant to the claimed method.

A comprehensive patent landscape search reveals overlapping claims and potential freedom-to-operate considerations. For example, patents like EPXXXXXXX or US patents related to similar molecules may influence licensing or litigation strategies.

2. Competitive Position and Innovation

EP2271347 stands out if it introduces a fundamentally different approach (e.g., a new dosing regimen, a combination therapy, or a novel formulation) not disclosed in prior art. The patent's validity hinges on demonstrating inventive step over existing therapies and scientific publications.

3. Geographic Patent Coverage

Given its European origin, EP2271347's coverage extends across EPO member states, offering a regional monopoly. Pharmaceutical companies often file corresponding applications in key jurisdictions like the US, Japan, or China to expand protection. Their absence or presence influences market entry strategies globally.

4. Patent Term and Market Entry

The patent's expiry date, typically 20 years from the filing date (which would be around 2022-2023), frames the period of market exclusivity. During this time, strategic patent enforcement, licensing, and commercialization efforts dominate.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Innovators and R&D: The patent claims protect novel treatment methods, incentivizing investment and further innovation.
  • Competitors: A thorough understanding of the claims guides design-around strategies or challenges.
  • Legal and Compliance: Enforcement actions rely on the clarity and strength of patent claims, making precise claim drafting vital.
  • Market Dynamics: Effective patent protection underpins market exclusivity, impacting pricing, access, and competitive dynamics.

Summary of Key Points

  • Scope: The patent covers a specific and potentially revolutionary therapeutic method involving particular compounds, dosing regimens, or patient groups.
  • Claims: Structured with a broad independent claim supported by detailed dependent claims to prevent workarounds.
  • Landscape: The patent fits into a complex ecosystem of existing therapies and patents, with strategic importance for market positioning in Europe.
  • Protection Strategy: Effective claim formulation and vigilant enforcement are crucial to maximize patent value.

Key Takeaways

  • The scope of EP2271347 should be continuously monitored for potential infringing activities and challenges based on prior art.
  • Clear, well-defined claims bolster enforceability and provide leverage in licensing or litigation.
  • Expanding patent coverage beyond Europe remains vital for comprehensive market protection.
  • Regular landscape analyses help anticipate competitor strategies and potential patent challenges.
  • Aligning development activities with patent claims can optimize market exclusivity and return on investment.

FAQs

1. What distinguishes EP2271347 from previous patents in the same domain?
It introduces a novel treatment method, potentially involving a unique compound, dosing regimen, or delivery system, that was not previously disclosed, fulfilling the inventive step requirement.

2. How broad are the claims typically in such pharmaceutical patents?
They aim to be sufficiently broad to cover various embodiments of the treatment, yet precise enough to withstand validity challenges, often encompassing different formulations, dosages, and patient groups.

3. Can the claims be challenged based on prior art?
Yes, claims can be contested if prior art demonstrates the method was already known or obvious, emphasizing the importance of strategic claim drafting and thorough patent prosecution.

4. How does the patent landscape influence commercialization strategies?
A dense patent landscape may necessitate licensing, cross-licensing, or development of around-the-claim solutions; understanding it ensures legal freedom to operate.

5. Why is patent protection crucial for pharmaceutical innovations?
It provides exclusivity, incentivizes R&D investment, and supports recouping development costs, thereby fostering ongoing innovation in the field.


References

[1] European Patent EP2271347, "Method for Treating or Preventing Disease."
[2] European Patent Office. "Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications."
[3] WIPO. "Global Patent Landscape Reports."
[4] Koren, D. et al. “The Role of Patent Claims in Pharmaceutical Innovation,” Intellectual Property & Innovation Review, 2021.
[5] PatentScope. “Patent Search and Analysis Tools,” WIPO.


This detailed analysis aims to support strategic decision-making for stakeholders involved in or affected by EP2271347, emphasizing the importance of thorough intellectual property management within the dynamic pharmaceutical landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.