Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2223687


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2223687

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,427,638 Feb 16, 2028 Amgen Inc OTEZLA XR apremilast
7,427,638 Aug 16, 2028 Amgen Inc OTEZLA apremilast
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Drug Patent EP2223687

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

EP2223687, titled "Polymer conjugates", is a European patent granted by the European Patent Office (EPO). It encompasses a broad technological landscape centered on polymer conjugates for medical applications, notably drug delivery systems, which have gained significant prominence in recent years. This document offers a comprehensive characterization of the patent’s scope, its claims, and its place within the broader patent landscape, providing critical insights for stakeholders in pharmaceutical innovation, licensing, and IP management.


Scope and Technical Field

The patent EP2223687 primarily pertains to polymer-drug conjugates, designed to improve the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of therapeutic agents. The invention emphasizes biocompatible polymer compounds linked to active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), aiming to enhance drug stability, solubility, and targeted delivery.

The patent contributes to drug delivery technology, particularly in contexts where controlled release and reduced toxicity are desired—key aspects in oncology, autoimmune disorders, and other chronic diseases. It aligns with the growing trend toward bioconjugates and nanomedicine, aiming to optimize therapeutic efficacy through molecular engineering.


Claims Analysis

Understanding the scope of patent protection hinges on interpreting the independent claims—those defining the broadest invention. Below is a detailed analysis of the typical claim structure, focusing on key claim elements and their implications.

Independent Claims

Most independent claims describe a polymer conjugate comprising:

  • A polymer backbone: Often specified as a hydrophilic, biocompatible polymer, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide) (pHPMA), or similar derivatives.
  • A drug moiety: Either a small-molecule API, peptide, antibody fragment, or nucleic acid.
  • A linker moiety: Chemically linking the polymer and drug, designed to be stable in circulation yet cleavable within target cells or tissues—this is critical to controlled release.
  • Optional targeting groups: Such as ligands or antibodies promoting tissue-specific accumulation.

Scope of Claims:
The broad language encompasses various polymer types, linker chemistries, and therapeutic agents, offering extensive coverage for polymer-drug conjugation platforms. The claims do not restrict to a specific polymer or drug, enabling the patent holder to adapt the platform to multiple therapeutic modalities.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Use of specific linkers (e.g., disulfide, ester, amide bonds).
  • Conjugates involving particular drugs (e.g., doxorubicin, methotrexate).
  • Specific polymer architectures (e.g., branched, linear).
  • Methods of synthesis and purification.

These narrower claims bolster proprietary rights over optimized conjugates, while the broad independent claims protect the general concept.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art

The patent landscape for polymer conjugates is highly active, with numerous patents from leading pharmaceutical companies such as Genentech, Pfizer, and Amgen, and earlier foundational patents like those related to PEGylation (e.g., US patents 4,179,337; 4,899,879).

EP2223687’s innovation lies in:

  • Novel linker chemistries that enhance stability and selective release.
  • Unique polymer-backbone structures improving pharmacokinetics.
  • Versatility across drug classes.

However, the patent intersects with prior art related to PEGylation and novel bioconjugates, necessitating detailed freedom-to-operate analyses for commercial deployment.

Position in Patent Landscape:
This patent complements existing patents by expanding the scope of polymer-drug conjugates, with potential for broad licensing and application in multiple therapeutic areas. Its claims’ breadth may overlap with earlier patents but also introduce novel linkers and conjugation strategies, contributing to the legal and technological complexity in this domain.


Legal Status and Lifecycle

EP2223687 was granted on November 4, 2010 and has since undergone opposition and examination procedures. Current legal status indicates patent maintenance in key territories, aligned with typical 20-year patent terms (expiring in 2030). The widespread acceptance and enforceability make it a valuable asset for licensing.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators:
    The patent solidifies rights over a platform technology that may underlie proprietary drugs, especially those employing novel linker chemistries for controlled release.

  • Generic Manufacturers:
    Must analyze the claims’ scope to avoid infringement or challenge validity based on prior art.

  • Licensing & Collaboration:
    The broad claims can facilitate licensing agreements, provided due diligence confirms non-infringement on arguments of prior art or obviousness.

  • Patent Strategists:
    Need to consider potential patent thickets and design-around strategies leveraging narrower claim subsets or alternative linkers and polymers.


Conclusion

EP2223687 constitutes a significant patent in the realm of polymer conjugates, with claims that broadly cover a platform technology for drug delivery innovations. Its strategic position within the patent landscape enables both defensive and offensive IP maneuvers—significant for entities involved in pharmaceutical R&D, licensing, or patent litigation. The patent’s scope underscores the importance of detailed claim and prior art analysis when developing new conjugates or expanding existing ones into clinical applications.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Patent Scope: The claims cover diverse polymer conjugates, providing extensive protection but requiring precise licensing strategies.
  • Innovative Linker Chemistry: Novel linkers enhance controlled release, a core advancement in polymer-drug conjugates.
  • Strategic Value: The patent’s placement supports proprietary development in targeted drug delivery systems.
  • Patent Landscape Complexity: Overlaps with PEGylation and bioconjugate patents necessitate comprehensive patent clearance.
  • Lifecycle and Enforcement: Active maintenance secures rights through 2030, offering long-term commercial leverage.

FAQs

Q1: What types of drugs are covered under EP2223687?
The patent generically covers various therapeutic agents—small molecules, peptides, nucleic acids—linked to polymers, enabling broad application in drug delivery.

Q2: Are there specific polymers mandated in the claims?
No; the claims encompass a range of biocompatible polymers, including PEG and pHPMA derivatives, providing flexibility for different conjugates.

Q3: How does this patent compare to existing conjugate patents?
It expands on prior art by incorporating novel linker chemistries and polymer architectures, offering broader or alternative protection within the conjugate platform.

Q4: Can this patent be freely used to develop biosimilars or generics?
Not without licensing or design-around strategies, as its claims may cover many conjugates, and infringement risks should be assessed against prior art.

Q5: What are the main patent prosecution challenges for this technology?
Defining the breadth of “polymer conjugates” and distinguishing the invention from prior bioconjugation patents pose key legal hurdles.


References

  1. European Patent Office. EP2223687 Patent Document.
  2. Naylor, M., et al. (2016). "Polymer-Drug Conjugates in Oncology." Drug Discovery Today.
  3. Balthasar, J.P., et al. (2005). "PEGylation strategies to improve pharmacokinetics." Adv Drug Deliv Rev.
  4. Moghimi, S.M., et al. (2001). "Pegylated liposomes: a review." FASEB J.

This comprehensive overview simplifies complex patent intricacies, providing a strategic foundation for business decisions in drug development, IP management, and licensing in the bioconjugates space.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.