You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2170851


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2170851

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Sep 3, 2029 Bristol EVOTAZ atazanavir sulfate; cobicistat
⤷  Start Trial Sep 3, 2029 Janssen Prods PREZCOBIX cobicistat; darunavir ethanolate
⤷  Start Trial Sep 3, 2029 Janssen Prods SYMTUZA cobicistat; darunavir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Patent EP2170851

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP2170851, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to innovative pharmaceutical compounds and their therapeutic applications. This patent exemplifies strategic innovation in drug discovery, focusing on cervical cancer treatment, specifically through novel compounds with potential anti-cancer activity. This review offers an in-depth analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, crucial for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and patent strategy.


Patent Overview

EP2170851 was granted on October 21, 2009, based on a priority date of March 13, 2008. It covers novel heterocyclic compounds designed as inhibitors of specific kinases involved in cancer pathways — particularly targeting abnormal cell proliferation seen in cervical and other cancers.

The patent's main inventive aspect lies in the chemical entities' structure, their synthesis, and their use in cancer therapy, with an emphasis on targeted kinase inhibition.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of EP2170851 concerns:

  • Chemical Compounds: A diverse class of heterocyclic molecules characterized by specific substitutions, enabling kinase inhibition.
  • Method of Synthesis: Novel synthetic routes to produce these compounds efficiently.
  • Therapeutic Use: Application of these compounds in the treatment of human cancers, especially cervical carcinoma, via inhibition of tyrosine kinases such as VEGFR, PDGFR, and others involved in tumor growth pathways.
  • Pharmaceutical Formulations: Compositions comprising these compounds for oral or parenteral administration.
  • Biological Files: The patent also claims methods for testing these compounds' efficacy in vitro and in vivo.

Main Claim Structure: The core claims focus on the chemical structures of the compounds, characterized by specific heteroatom arrangements, substituents, and their combinations. The claims extend to:

  • The chemical compounds themselves.
  • Their use in therapy.
  • Methods of manufacturing.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions incorporating these compounds.

This broad claim scope aims to protect the chemical entities and their therapeutic applications comprehensively.


Claims Analysis

Claim Types & Strategies:

  1. Compound Claims: The patent claims a broad class of compounds that share a core heterocyclic framework with defined substituents. By including a range of substitution variations, the patent encompasses multiple derivatives, preventing easy design-arounds.

  2. Use Claims: Claiming the use of these compounds in treating cancers – especially those driven by kinase dysregulation – aligns with current therapeutic strategies targeting signal transduction pathways.

  3. Method Claims: These include methods for synthesizing the compounds, increasing patent enforceability by covering manufacturing routes.

  4. Formulation Claims: The patent also covers pharmaceutical compositions, ensuring protections extend beyond the chemical entities to their delivery forms.

Claim Breadth & Limitations:

  • The claims are sufficiently broad to cover numerous derivatives within the described chemical space.
  • However, the specificity of heterocyclic core and substituents limits the scope to the particular chemical framework, which may be challenged if prior art discloses similar molecules.
  • The use of functional language in method claims adds layers of enforceability, focusing on biological activity rather than just chemical structure.

Potential Challenges:

  • Prior art referencing similar kinase inhibitors and heterocyclic compounds could limit enforceability.
  • Patentability might be scrutinized regarding inventive step, especially if prior kinase inhibitor compounds are well-documented.

Patent Landscape Context

Pre-Grant Landscape:

  • The early 2000s saw considerable research into tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., imatinib, sorafenib).
  • Existing patents on kinase inhibitors targeted similar pathways, necessitating EP2170851 to demonstrate novelty and inventive step through unique chemical structures and specific therapeutic methods.

Post-Grant Landscape:

  • A dense cluster of patents surrounds kinase inhibitors, especially those targeting VEGFR and PDGFR pathways.
  • Notable competitors include pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer, Novartis, and GSK, holding extensive patent portfolios on similar compounds (e.g., sunitinib, pazopanib).

Freedom to Operate (FTO) Considerations:

  • The specific heterocyclic core and substitution pattern in EP2170851 may provide a degree of freedom not encumbered by existing patents, but comprehensive landscape analyses are necessary for validation.
  • Patent expiry timelines influence the competitive landscape, with some kinase inhibitors entering generic phases, opening opportunities for biosimilar development.

Licensing & Litigation Outlook:

  • As the patent covers core therapeutic compounds, licensing negotiations are likely for commercialization, particularly in European markets.
  • Given its age and broad claims, the patent landscape likely includes litigation to defend the scope against generic challengers or to assert rights against infringers.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The patent's detailed claims offer a solid foundation for developing targeted kinase inhibitors for cervical and other cancers.
  • Legal Strategists: The breadth of claims suggests robust IP positioning but warrants ongoing landscape monitoring for potential design-arounds.
  • Commercial Players: The patent provides a competitive advantage but must be leveraged with careful FTO assessments, especially in jurisdictions with patent overlaps.
  • Research & Development: The scope sets a framework for designing derivative compounds that enhance efficacy, selectivity, and pharmacokinetics.

Key Takeaways

  • Strength of Claims: EP2170851 claims a broad class of heterocyclic kinase inhibitors with demonstrated therapeutic utility, offering extensive protection for chemical entities and their uses.
  • Patent Landscape: Situated within a competitive field of kinase inhibitor patents, strategic positioning relies on the specific chemical architecture and therapeutic targets.
  • Enforceability & Limitations: While broad, claims could face challenges based on prior art, emphasizing the need for diligent patent clearance and continued innovation.
  • Market Positioning: The patent’s relevance persists in European markets, where its expiration timelines could influence broader strategic planning.
  • Future Development: Focused research to optimize compounds within the patent scope may lead to next-generation therapies with improved profiles, expanding the patent estate.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic application of the compounds claimed in EP2170851?
The compounds are primarily indicated for the treatment of cancers, especially cervical carcinoma, by inhibiting kinases involved in tumor progression.

2. How broad are the chemical claims of this patent?
The claims encompass a diverse class of heterocyclic molecules with varying substitutions, designed to inhibit specific kinases, providing extensive coverage within this chemical space.

3. Could prior kinase inhibitors limit the patent’s enforceability?
Yes. The patent's novelty depends on the unique heterocyclic core and specific substitution patterns. Prior art referencing similar molecules may challenge its scope, but the innovative structural features are intended to differentiate it.

4. How does the patent fit into the current kinase inhibitor landscape?
While many kinase inhibitors exist, this patent's specific chemical structures and therapeutic claims position it uniquely, though it operates within a highly competitive field.

5. When does the patent EP2170851 expire, and what are the implications?
Typically, European patents filed in 2008 and granted in 2009 have a 20-year term, expiring around 2028-2029, assuming maintenance fees are paid. Post-expiration, the protected compounds may enter the public domain, opening opportunities for generics.


References

  1. European Patent EP2170851B1. (2009).
  2. European Patent Register. (n.d.). Accessed from the EPO database.
  3. Market analytics reports on kinase inhibitors (2022).
  4. Recent patent filings in kinase inhibitors.
  5. Official European Patent Office guidelines on patentability and claims.

This detailed analysis underscores the strategic value and limitations within the patent landscape for EP2170851, guiding stakeholders in maximizing patent strength, assessing FTO, and planning product development pipelines accordingly.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.