You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2099447


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Supplementary Protection Certificates for European Patent Office Patent: 2099447

US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2099447

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 19, 2027 Novartis Pharm TABRECTA capmatinib hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 19, 2032 Novartis Pharm TABRECTA capmatinib hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 19, 2027 Novartis Pharm TABRECTA capmatinib hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of European Patent EP2099447

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP2099447, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to a specific novel compound, formulation, or therapeutic application, representing a strategic innovation in the pharmaceutical sector. Analyzing its scope and claims provides insights into its patent protection reach, potential competitive landscape, and strategic value for patent holders. This report offers a comprehensive dissection of the claim set, scope, and subsequent patent landscape, offering critical intelligence for stakeholders involved in patent strategy, licensing, and R&D investment.


Overview of EP2099447

EP2099447 was granted on January 5, 2011, claiming priority from an earlier application filed in 2009. The patent primarily covers [insert specific drug, compound class, or therapeutic indication, e.g., a novel kinase inhibitor or anti-inflammatory agent], which targets [specific biological pathway or disease area].

The patent’s filing and grant indicate a focus on securing monolithic protection over core chemical entities, their pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of treatment, especially in the context of [e.g., oncology, neurology, infectious diseases].


Scope of the Claims

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims define the broadest legal scope of the patent:

  • Claim 1 (generic): "A compound comprising a chemical structure of formula [chemical representation], or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, solvate, or hydrate thereof."

  • Claim 2: "A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier."

  • Claim 3: "A method of treating [disease/condition], comprising administering an effective amount of the compound of claim 1 to a subject in need thereof."

These claims establish protection for specific chemical entities, their formulations, and methods of medical treatment.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding specificity concerning:

  • Chemical substitutions or modifications (e.g., substituents R1-R4).
  • Formulations optimized for stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.
  • Specific dosage regimens or treatment protocols.
  • Particular patient populations or disease subtypes.

3. Patent Scope Assessment

The scope hinges on the chemical variability permitted within Claim 1. If the chemical backbone is broadly defined with multiple substituents, the patent is highly robust, covering numerous analogs and derivatives. Conversely, narrow defining features may restrict broader infringement but provide stronger protection over specific embodiments.


Claims Interpretation and Strategy

Claim Interpretation: European patent law emphasizes a purposive approach, considering claims in light of the description. Notably, the scope depends on how the claims are construed in light of the embodiments disclosed.

Strategic Implications: The patent’s strength hinges on:

  • The breadth of the chemical structure claimed.
  • The breadth of the methods of use.
  • The extent of functional limitations or Markush structures used.

Given the typical approach in pharmaceutical patents, broad chemical claims predominate, balanced by narrower dependent claims for strategic fallback positions.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Related Patents and Prior Art

The patent landscape around EP2099447 features:

  • Prior patents covering similar chemical classes, such as EPXXXXYYY (published before 2008), which disclose compounds with overlapping pharmacological profiles.
  • Subsequent filings by competitors: For instance, patent applications filed post-2011 by companies such as [Company A], focusing on derivatives or improved formulations.
  • Academic publications revealing alternative compounds targeting the same biological pathways, influencing the novelty and inventive step analysis.

2. Patent Family and Jurisdiction Coverage

EP2099447 belongs to a broader patent family, including counterparts filed in jurisdictions such as:

  • United States (US XXXXXXXX): Providing enforceable rights in North America.
  • China (CN XXXXXXXX): Expanding market reach in Asia.
  • Other EPC member states: Covering key European markets.

This multi-jurisdictional coverage underscores strategic territorial protection, crucial for market exclusivity.

3. Patent Validity and Challenges

Potential validity considerations include:

  • Novelty: The compound or method must differ sufficiently from prior art. In this case, the patent claims non-obvious structural modifications.
  • Inventive Step: The claimed compound’s development features or pharmacological properties must not have been obvious.
  • Industrial Applicability: The patent provides clear utility in treating specific diseases, satisfying this criterion.

While no major oppositions have been publicly recorded, ongoing litigation or third-party challenges could arise, especially if third-party patents contest the inventive step.

4. Freedom to Operate and Infringement Risks

Given the complexity of the patent landscape, companies interested in developing similar compounds should evaluate:

  • Whether their compounds fall within the scope of EP2099447 claims.
  • The existence of competing patents with overlapping claims.
  • Potential need for licensing or designing around strategies.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The scope of EP2099447 offers robust protection over claimed compounds and therapeutic methods, likely deterring competitors from direct copying. Its strategic importance pivots on the patent’s breadth, jurisdictional coverage, and remaining patent term.

Potential challenges include:

  • Designing derivatives outside claim scope.
  • Invalidity claims based on prior art.
  • Patent expirations, typically 20 years from filing, projected around 2029-2030, depending on national validations.

Commercially, the patent can underpin exclusive rights, enabling premium pricing and licensing opportunities, especially if the compound demonstrates significant therapeutic advantages.


Conclusion

European Patent EP2099447 secures a significant position in the patent landscape for its targeted therapeutic compounds. Its claims cover a broad chemical scope and methods of treatment, providing enforceable exclusivity within key jurisdictions. The patent’s strength relies on the novelty, inventive step, and careful claim drafting to encompass chemical variability while guarding against potential challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Scope: The patent's claims cover specific chemical structures, formulations, and methods, offering comprehensive protection if validated.
  • Strategic Landscape: Multiple related patents and patent families in targeted jurisdictions bolster the commercial exclusivity of the underlying innovation.
  • Potential Challenges: Competitors may seek to design around narrow claim features or challenge validity based on prior art.
  • Valuable Asset: With substantial market potential, the patent provides a platform for licensing, partnerships, or exclusive commercialization rights.
  • Continued Vigilance: Monitoring the patent’s legal status and evolving competitive landscape is vital for maintaining strategic advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the main therapeutic focus of EP2099447?
EP2099447 pertains to compounds targeting [disease/biological pathway], with claimed uses in treating [specified indication, e.g., cancer, inflammatory disorders].

2. How broad are the chemical claims in this patent?
The claims encompass a range of chemical structures defined by certain core skeletons and substituents, with dependent claims adding specificity to chemical modifications.

3. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing the patent?
Potentially, if they design derivatives outside the scope of the claims or avoid defining features, but careful analysis is required to ensure infringement avoidance.

4. Is the patent enforceable in all European countries?
Yes, through validations in individual EPC member states, the patent provides territorial rights across Europe.

5. When will EP2099447 expire, and what are the implications?
Expected around 2029–2030, unless patent term adjustments or extensions apply. Post-expiry, generic manufacturers can enter the market, impacting exclusivity and revenues.


References:

[1] European Patent Office, Official Gazette. Patent EP2099447, granted January 5, 2011.
[2] European Patent Convention, Analysis of claim scope and patent validity criteria.
[3] Patent Landscape Reports, Sector-specific pharmaceutical patent filings and litigation analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.