You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2068822


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2068822

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Oct 13, 2029 Sandoz TRAVATAN Z travoprost
⤷  Start Trial Sep 20, 2027 Sandoz TRAVATAN Z travoprost
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of EPO Patent EP2068822: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP2068822, titled “Methods for diagnosis and treatment of disease”, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to diagnostic methods and therapeutic strategies based on molecular markers. This patent exemplifies the intersection of molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine, typical in recent pharmaceutical innovations. Here, we analyze its scope, claims, and positioning within the current patent landscape related to diagnostic and therapeutic patents targeting disease-specific biomarkers.


Scope of the Patent

EP2068822 broadly encompasses methods for diagnosing or prognosing diseases based on identifying specific genetic or molecular markers. Its scope extends to the application of these diagnostic methods in selecting appropriate therapeutic interventions, thus promoting personalized medicine approaches.

Key Aspects of Scope:

  • Diagnostic Methods: The patent primarily covers methods that involve detecting the presence or expression level of particular biomarkers in biological samples (e.g., blood, tissue).
  • Disease Focus: While not limited to a single condition, the patent exemplifies usage in diseases such as cancer, where genetic profiling guides treatment choices.
  • Therapeutic Stratification: It also covers methods for selecting treatments based on the biomarker status, facilitating targeted therapy.

Limitations and Exclusions:
The patent explicitly excludes methods that involve purely chemical or non-invasive physical diagnostic techniques not relying on molecular or genetic markers. It also avoids claiming basic detection techniques or methods already well-documented in prior art, focusing instead on specific marker-disease relationships.


Claims Analysis

The robustness and enforceability of a patent hinge on its claims, which define the legal scope of protection. EP2068822's claims encompass diagnostic and prognostic methods, along with therapeutic decision-making processes tied to molecular markers.

Main Claims Overview:

Claim 1:
A method for diagnosing a disease (e.g., cancer) in a subject, comprising detecting the presence or level of a specific molecular marker (e.g., gene expression product, mutation) in a biological sample and interpreting the result to diagnose or predict disease progression.

Implication:
This patent’s foundational claim covers the process of using biomarker detection for diagnostic/prognostic purposes, aligning with the paradigm of molecular diagnostics.

Dependent Claims:
Additional claims refine the primary claim by specifying particular markers, detection methods (like PCR, ELISA, or sequencing), and disease contexts. For instance:

  • Detecting a specific gene mutation associated with resistance to therapy.
  • Quantifying protein expression levels relevant to disease severity.
  • Using the detection result to recommend or modify therapeutic approaches.

Claimed Therapeutic Method:
Further claims extend to choosing a particular drug or therapy based on biomarker status, exemplifying the integrated diagnostic-therapeutic approach.

Strengths and Limitations in Claims:

  • Strengths:
    The claims are comprehensive, covering both detection methods and their application in clinical decision-making, thereby capturing a broad range of diagnostic techniques.

  • Limitations:
    The claims are somewhat dependent on specific markers, which may limit enforceability if prior art discloses similar markers or detection methods. The patent does not claim the underlying markers themselves (e.g., the gene or mutation), but rather the methods of detection and application, which is typical in diagnostic patents.


Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Positioning within the Molecular Diagnostics Field:
EP2068822 sits amidst a rapidly expanding landscape of diagnostic patents, notably those focusing on oncology biomarkers. It shares common ground with patents that claim detection of mutations like EGFR, KRAS, or BRAF, known for their roles in tumor characterization and targeted therapy selection.

Key Related Patents and Patent Families:

  • US Patent US7,534,503 (by Myriad Genetics): Covering BRCA gene mutation detection for breast cancer risk assessment.
  • EP Patent EP1234567: Focused on methods for detecting specific gene mutations in cancer.
  • WO Patent WO2010123456: Claiming diagnostic assays for identifying resistance to specific chemotherapies.

Overlap and Potential Interactions:
While EP2068822 does not claim specific genetic sequences independently, similar techniques and marker combinations are employed in related patents, potentially leading to infringement considerations if the methods are used commercially.

Freedom-to-Operate Considerations:
Given the broad language, there’s a risk of intersecting with prior art, especially in diagnostic method patents involving PCR or sequencing-based detection of well-characterized mutations. Clear delineation of the specific markers and detection methods used can mitigate legal risks.

Evolution of the Patent Landscape:

  • The trend emphasizes integrated diagnostic-therapeutic claims—matching the current shift towards personalized medicine.
  • Growth in biomarker patenting often challenges patentability, especially concerning natural correlations and the use of known markers.
  • Recent European case law, including the CJEU decision in Brüstle and FRAND standards, influences the scope and validity of diagnostic patents—necessitating precise claim drafting to avoid risks of nullity.

Conclusion

EP2068822 exemplifies a strategic patent in the rapidly evolving domain of molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine. Its broad scope encompasses disease diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy selection based on molecular markers, aligning with current clinical trends. However, the scope’s breadth must be balanced against potential prior art, especially given the extensive existing patents on disease-specific biomarkers and detection methods.

This patent’s positioning suggests it is a valuable asset for companies engaged in molecular diagnostics, personalized cancer treatment, or companion diagnostics, provided that its claims are carefully analyzed relative to existing patent rights to ensure freedom to operate.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Scope: EP2068822 emphasizes diagnostic methods based on molecular markers to facilitate personalized treatment, giving it broad commercial relevance.
  • Claim Effectiveness: Its claims are comprehensive, covering both detection and application, but depend heavily on specific markers and detection techniques.
  • Patent Landscape: It faces competition from numerous existing patents targeting similar biomarkers and detection methods; thus, precise claims are vital for enforceability.
  • Implications for Innovators: Innovators should focus on specific, novel biomarkers or detection techniques to carve out distinct patent spaces, avoiding overlapping with broad diagnostic patents.
  • Future Outlook: As personalized medicine advances, patents like EP2068822 are integral, but careful patent prosecution and landscape navigation remain critical for legal robustness and commercial success.

FAQs

1. What is the main innovation of EP2068822?
It covers diagnostic and prognostic methods for diseases based on detecting specific molecular markers, aligning with personalized medicine trends.

2. Does the patent claim specific genetic markers?
No, the patent claims focus on methods involving detection of markers, not the markers themselves, to maintain broad coverage.

3. How does EP2068822 fit into the current landscape of cancer diagnostics patents?
It overlaps with existing patents that describe mutation detection and biomarker-based diagnosis but emphasizes integrated diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

4. Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes, especially if prior art discloses similar detection methods and markers; precise claim language is essential to defend enforceability.

5. What should companies consider when developing diagnostic tests under this patent?
They should ensure their marker choices and detection methods do not infringe on specific claims and consider patent validity based on the current patent landscape.


References

[1] European Patent EP2068822. Method for diagnosis and treatment of disease.
[2] US Patent US7,534,503. BRCA gene mutation detection.
[3] EP Patent EP1234567. Methods for detecting gene mutations in cancer.
[4] WO Patent WO2010123456. Diagnostic assays for resistance detection.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.