You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 202090960


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 202090960

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,702,508 Apr 30, 2038 Janssen Biotech ERLEADA apalutamide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA202090960

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Patent EA202090960, granted by the Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. Understanding the scope and claims of this patent is essential for assessing its market exclusivity, competitive landscape, and potential for licensing or litigation strategies. This analysis provides an in-depth review of its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape within the Eurasian region related to this patent.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: EA202090960
Jurisdiction: Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO)
Filing Date: [Assumed] 2020 (exact date pending for verification)
Publication Date: 2021 (assumed)
Patent Life: Typically 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees

Type of Patent: Likely a compound, formulation, or method of use, common in pharmaceutical patents.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of EA202090960 is primarily dictated by its claims, which define the legal bounds of the invention. Analyzing the scope involves synthesizing both the independent and dependent claims and understanding the technical advances they cover.

Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims:

  • Chemical Compound/Formulation Claim:
    The core of the patent likely claims a specific chemical entity, possibly a novel molecule or a pharmaceutical composition comprising the molecule. The claim specifies the compound's structure, possibly with substitutions that distinguish it from prior art.

  • Method of Manufacturing:
    The patent may claim a unique synthesis process for the compound, providing advantages such as increased yield, purity, or cost-effectiveness.

  • Therapeutic Use:
    Claims might cover the use of the compound or formulation for treating specific diseases or conditions, expanding the patent's scope to include method-of-use protections.

2. Dependent Claims:

Dependent claims delineate specific embodiments, such as:

  • Variations in chemical substituents
  • Specific dosage forms or delivery methods
  • Use in particular patient populations
  • Specific stability or bioavailability properties

Scope Considerations:

  • The claims' breadth directly impacts potential infringing activities. Broad claims covering the generic chemical scaffold could impede generic development.
  • Narrow claims, focusing on specific derivatives, provide narrower but more enforceable protection.

Claim Construction and Patent Scope

Patent drafting style suggests:

  • Broad Claims:
    Encompass the general chemical framework or method, offering wide protection but more vulnerable to validity challenges under prior art.

  • Narrow Claims:
    Cover specific compounds or formulations, providing targeted exclusivity with potentially less invalidity risk.

Implications for Market Participants:

  • Companies must analyze whether their compounds fall within the claim scope or whether design-around strategies are feasible.
  • Given the Eurasian market's jurisdictional differences, patent stronghold depends on claim scope and regional patent prosecution strategies.

Patent Landscape

Global and Eurasian Context

The patent landscape for drug inventions involves overlapping patents across jurisdictions including Eurasia, Europe (EPO), US (USPTO), and China (CNIPA). A thorough landscape analysis reveals:

  • Patent Families:
    The patent EA202090960 may belong to a family with counterparts in other jurisdictions, notably in Europe and Asia, indicating strategic global patenting.

  • Prior Art References:
    Patent applications closely related to this patent likely cite prior art involving similar compounds, methods, or formulations, informing validity considerations.

  • Competitor Patents:
    Companies active in similar therapeutic areas (e.g., oncology, neurology) may hold related patents or applications, creating a crowded patent space.

Patent Strengths and Vulnerabilities

  • Strengths:

    • Novel chemical structure with unexpected therapeutic effects
    • Well-defined claims covering unique features
    • Patent family extensions in key markets
  • Vulnerabilities:

    • Prior art references suggesting the compound or similar formulations
    • Narrow claims susceptible to design-around strategies
    • Pending oppositions or legal challenges in Eurasia or other jurisdictions

Eurasian Patent System Particulars

The Eurasian patent system operates as a centralized process, yet regional decisions affect enforcement. patent EA202090960 may face specific challenges based on national patent laws, including:

  • Inventive Step:
    Must demonstrate non-obviousness over prior art within Eurasia context.

  • Novelty:
    Must be distinguishable from existing patents or publications.

  • Potential for Opposition:
    Post-grant oppositions or revocation proceedings may target broad claims or prior art issues.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The patent confers exclusive rights within Eurasian member states, bolstering market positioning.
  • Competitors must navigate around claims to develop alternative therapies.
  • Patent lifecycle management, including maintenance and potential opposition, critically influences long-term exclusivity.

Conclusion

Patent EA202090960 appears to secure a significant position for a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation within the Eurasian patent landscape. The scope primarily depends on the breadth of the claims, which seem to cover specific compounds, synthesis methods, or uses. While the patent provides a robust barrier to generic entry, the narrowness or breadth of claims will dictate its enforceability and strength against challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth Defines Market Exclusivity: Broader claims provide stronger protection but are more vulnerable to invalidity challenges; narrower claims confer limited exclusivity.
  • Strategic Patent Family Building: Filing equivalents across jurisdictions strengthens global market position.
  • Landscape Analysis is Critical: Recognizing overlapping patents or prior art facilitates proactive licensing, licensing, or litigation strategies.
  • Vigilance in Legal Proceedings: Monitoring potential oppositions, especially in Eurasia, ensures the patent’s enforceability.
  • Innovation Validation: The patent’s claims should be evaluated against current scientific developments to affirm their novelty and inventive step.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation covered by patent EA202090960?
The patent claims likely encompass a specific chemical entity or pharmaceutical formulation with unique structural or functional features, intended for therapeutic application.

2. How does the claim scope influence market exclusivity?
Wider claims can block generic competitors across multiple product variants, while narrower claims may permit some design-around strategies, impacting exclusivity duration.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges can arise based on prior art that anticipates or renders the invention obvious, particularly if the patent’s scope is broad.

4. What is the significance of patent family members in other jurisdictions?
They extend legal protection into multiple markets, enabling broader commercial strategies and defending against infringement globally.

5. How does Eurasian patent law compare to other jurisdictions in drug patenting?
EAPO balances harmonization with local legal nuances, emphasizing inventive step and novelty, akin to European and other major patent systems, but with specific procedural distinctions.


References

  1. Eurasian Patent Office official documentation and procedural guidelines.
  2. Patent EA202090960 patent publication details (assumed for this analysis).
  3. Regional patent landscape reports, including Eurasian, European, and US patent databases.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.