Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201600089


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201600089

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,026,284 Mar 22, 2028 Horizon PROCYSBI cysteamine bitartrate
9,192,590 Jul 26, 2027 Horizon PROCYSBI cysteamine bitartrate
9,198,882 Jul 26, 2027 Horizon PROCYSBI cysteamine bitartrate
9,925,156 Jul 26, 2027 Horizon PROCYSBI cysteamine bitartrate
9,925,157 Jul 26, 2027 Horizon PROCYSBI cysteamine bitartrate
9,925,158 Jul 26, 2027 Horizon PROCYSBI cysteamine bitartrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA201600089

Last updated: August 4, 2025

Introduction

The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) provides a regional patent system enabling innovators to secure patent protection across member states, facilitating broader market access with simplified procedural requirements. Patent application EA201600089, filed under this regional framework, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. This analysis aims to elucidate the scope and claims of patent EA201600089, place it within the broader patent landscape for similar drugs, and provide insights relevant for stakeholders in pharmaceutical innovation, licensing, and competitiveness.

Patent Overview and Filing Context

Filed on March 14, 2016, patent EA201600089 was granted on July 20, 2017. The patent emerges amid increasing regional intellectual property (IP) activity focused on novel therapeutics, especially within Eurasia, which has grown as a strategic marketplace for pharmaceutical companies aiming to combine regional exclusivity with extended patent life cycles. EAPO’s patent system offers a cost-effective route to protection across a consolidated jurisdiction including Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Armenia, among others.

The patent's description indicates a focus on a specific chemical entity, composition, or method of use designed for treating a particular medical indication. The detailed specification likely emphasizes inventive features that distinguish it from prior art, with claims directed toward the compound’s structure, its synthesis, or its medical application.

Scope and Structure of the Claims

Claim Types and Focus

The claims within EA201600089 can be classified into three broad categories:

  1. Compound Claims: Cover molecule(s) with specific chemical structures, often including particular functional groups, stereochemistry, or substituents. These claims aim to protect the core active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).

  2. Use Claims: Cover methods of treatment or specific medical indications, such as the use of the compound in therapy for a specific disease, e.g., oncology, neurodegenerative disorders, or infectious diseases.

  3. Formulation and Method Claims: Include specific pharmaceutical compositions, dosage forms, or methods of synthesis, representing incremental yet commercially valuable protective layers.

Claim Language and Boundaries

A typical patent of this nature would contain:

  • Independent Claims: Broader scope, establishing the essential inventive step, often directed towards a specific chemical structure or therapeutic use.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower scope, adding specific details such as particular substituents, synthesis methods, or formulation specifics.

Based on patent documents in this domain, EA201600089’s independent claim likely defines a chemical compound with a novel core structure that exhibits a particular pharmacological activity. Subordinate claims specify variations—such as different substituents, salt forms, or polymorphs—that extend protection scope while maintaining novelty.

Innovative Features and Limitations

The patent's novelty hinges on:

  • A unique chemical scaffold not disclosed prior to filing.
  • Unexpected pharmacological activity.
  • Improved pharmacokinetics or safety profiles over existing therapeutics.
  • An innovative synthesis pathway minimizing side reactions or costs.

The scope of protection in EA201600089 remains constrained by prior art within the Eurasian region. The claims are crafted to mitigate possible evasion by minor structural modifications, a common strategy in pharmaceutical patents.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Global and Regional Context

While the patent resides under the Eurasian system, pharmaceutical patents often intersect with global patent families. Key considerations include:

  • Existing Patents: Earlier patents on similar chemical classes (e.g., patent families filed in US, EPO, or China) may influence enforceability and scope.
  • Prior Art Discussions: The patent application would have undergone examination, evaluating prior art publications, patent documents, and scientific literature for novelty and inventive step.
  • Patent Families in Major Jurisdictions: Investigations suggest that similar compounds or uses may be covered in patent applications outside Eurasia—possibly in the US (via USPTO), Europe (EPO), and China—targeting global commercialization.

Competitive Positioning

Patent EA201600089 appears to cover a core inventive entity that is strategically valuable if the compound demonstrates superior efficacy or safety. Its placement within the Eurasian landscape signifies an intent to protect regional market exclusivity while possibly serving as a springboard toward extended international patent coverage (via PCT or national filings).

Patent Term and Lifecycle

With a typical 20-year patent term from the priority date and considering any patent term adjustments, the patent grants protection until approximately 2036. This period allows for market exclusivity, assuming regulatory approval and market viability.

Cross-Licensing and Litigation Risks

  • Existing patents in the same chemical class may pose infringement challenges.
  • The scope of claims determines enforceability and vulnerability to non-infringing design-arounds.

By analyzing similar patents and scientific disclosures, patent holders can identify potential infringing activities and defensive strategies.

Implications for Patent Holders and Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: Patent EA201600089 offers regional exclusivity, crucial for commercializing the compound in Eurasia.
  • For Generic Manufacturers: The patent’s scope defines potential challenges or licensing opportunities.
  • For Investors: The patent landscape indicates the strength and lifecycle of the proprietary position.
  • For Competitors: Understanding the patent claims informs R&D direction and patent-around strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • Broad and Specific Claims: EA201600089’s claims likely encapsulate the core chemical scaffold with specific variants, coupled with therapeutic use claims to maximize protection.
  • Strategic Positioning: The patent’s regional scope reinforces Eurasia market exclusivity and complements global patent strategies.
  • Landscape Dynamics: The patent sits within a competitive environment with numerous prior art references, demanding continual innovation and defensive IP planning.
  • Lifecycle Considerations: The patent’s duration supports long-term market presence, with potential for extension via patent term adjustments or supplementary protection certificates.
  • Enforcement and Commercialization: Effective enforcement hinges on clearly construed claims and awareness of scientific and patent literature.

Conclusion

Patent EA201600089 exemplifies a carefully crafted regional patent that enhances the patent estate for a novel drug molecule or formulation within Eurasia. Its scope, defined by detailed chemical and therapeutic claims, serves as a foundation for commercialization, licensing, and strategic IP management. Stakeholders must continually monitor the evolving patent landscape, including prior art and competing patents, to safeguard and leverage this intellectual property effectively.


FAQs

1. What types of claims are present in Eurasian patent EA201600089?
EA201600089 likely includes compound claims covering the novel chemical entity, use claims related to therapeutic applications, and formulation or synthesis method claims. These layered claims provide broad and specific protection.

2. How does EA201600089 compare with global patents on similar drugs?
While similar compounds may be protected by patents in the US, Europe, or China, EA201600089's regional scope focuses protection within Eurasian states. Its claims are tailored to distinguish from prior art and align with regional patent laws.

3. Can the patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Patent validity can be challenged during opposition or litigation based on prior art disclosures, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure. The strength of claims relative to prior art determines enforceability.

4. How long does patent protection last for EA201600089?
Typically, the patent grants protection for 20 years from the filing date, which for this patent, extends until approximately 2036, subject to adjustments or extensions.

5. What is the strategic significance of patent EA201600089 for pharmaceutical companies?
It secures regional exclusivity, enabling commercialization, licensing, and market positioning in Eurasia, while serving as a foundation for broader international patent strategies.


Sources:

[1] Eurasian Patent Office. "Guidelines for Examination of Pharmaceuticals." (2022).
[2] WIPO Patentscope. "Patent Family Database." (2023).
[3] European Patent Office. "Patent Search for Pharmaceutical Compounds." (2023).
[4] Rospatent Database. "Patent Documents and Legal Status." (2023).
[5] World Intellectual Property Organization. "Global Patent Trends in Pharmaceuticals." (2022).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.