Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201590617


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201590617

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jan 30, 2034 Acrotech Biopharma EVOMELA melphalan hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent EA201590617

Last updated: August 12, 2025

Introduction

The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) governs the patent landscape within its member states, including Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan. The patent application EA201590617 offers insights into innovation trends, legal scope, and potential competitive positioning in the pharmaceutical industry. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and overall patent landscape, enabling stakeholders to assess legal strength, market coverage, and strategic implications.

Patent Overview

EA201590617 was filed under the Eurasian Patent Convention (EPC) and published following examination. The application addresses a specific drug-related invention, likely involving pharmaceutical compositions, methods of production, or therapeutic use.

While exact details depend on the patent document itself, typical EAPO patents in the pharmaceutical domain encompass claims concerning chemical compounds, formulations, and methods of treatment. Extracting and analyzing these elements offers insights into the patent's breadth and enforceability.

Scope of the Patent

The scope delineates the patent’s legal boundaries—what is and isn't covered. The scope largely depends on how broad or narrow the claims are drafted, which determines the patent's market exclusivity.

Pharmaceutical Composition Claims

Many patents in this domain claim chemical entities characterized by specific molecular structures, substituents, or isomers. The scope of such claims can range from narrow, focusing on a specific compound, to broad, covering a class of compounds sharing core structural features.

For example, if the patent claims a particular chemical formula with specific substituents, the scope likely extends to all compounds fitting that structure. Broader claims, such as "a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound selected from the group of compounds represented by formula X," increase exclusivity but risk invalidation if found overly broad.

Method of Production

Claims may also encompass methods of synthesizing the drug molecule, which, if drafted broadly, can provide the patentee with leverage over competitors implementing similar processes.

Therapeutic Use Claims

Use claims specify the therapeutic applications of the compound or composition, such as treating a specific disease or condition. These are typically narrower but can be strategically valuable for extending patent life through new medical indications.

Claims Analysis

The validity and enforceability of a patent depend heavily on the specific claims. EA201590617 likely contains several independent claims covering core aspects and subordinate dependent claims providing narrower protections.

Independent Claims

  • Composition claims: Cover the chemical compound or class, likely expressed via structural formulas or parameter ranges.
  • Method claims: Cover processes for preparing the compound or administering it.
  • Use claims: Cover the use of the compound in treating specific diseases.

Dependent Claims

  • Specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, dosage forms, or administration routes.
  • Provide fallback positions if the broader claims are challenged or invalidated.

Claim Strategies

The patent’s strength hinges on balancing breadth and specificity:

  • Breadth: Ensures extensive market coverage but risks invalidity for lack of novelty or inventive step.
  • Narrowness: Enhances validity but limits competitive exclusivity.

Patent drafting under EAPO standards emphasizes clarity, novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, in line with regional patent laws.

Patent Landscape

Understanding the patent landscape involves assessing similar patents, prior art, and existing protections within Eurasia.

Prior Art and Innovation Trends

Recent years have seen increased filings of pharmaceutical patents in the Eurasian region, especially around biologics and targeted therapies. EA201590617 likely addresses a novel therapeutic compound or method, as indicated by strict examination standards in EAPO.

Competitor Patents

Similar patents tend to focus on:

  • Chemical analogs of existing drugs
  • Multimodal drug delivery systems
  • Novel use indications

A thorough landscape review reveals whether EA201590617 is pioneering or follows crowded innovation pathways.

Regional Patent Considerations

  • Russian Federation: Dominates Eurasian patent filings due to market size.
  • Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan: Provide secondary markets with regional patent protection.
  • Patent Maintenance: Eurasian patents require annual fees; non-payment can lead to expiration, affecting exclusivity.

Legal and Regulatory Environment

Pharmaceutical patents in Eurasia are subject to stringent examination, focusing on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, aligning with WIPO standards. Patent invalidation risks include prior art disclosure or lack of inventive step, especially if the claims are overly broad.

Strategic Implications

  • Market Entry: EA201590617 potentially blocks competitors from developing similar drugs within EAPO member states.
  • Patent Life: Since Eurasian patents generally last 20 years from filing, expiring around 2035, strategic planning around life cycle management is crucial.
  • Parallel Filings: Patent families filed simultaneously in other jurisdictions (e.g., Eurasian, Russian, European, US) may maximize territorial coverage.

Legal Challenges and Opportunities

  • Invalidation Risks: Excessively broad claims might be challenged and invalidated. Incorporating narrow, well-supported dependent claims increases defendability.
  • Patent Term Extensions: Eurasia does not permit extensions akin to those available under some other jurisdictions; thus, regulatory delays can impact effective market exclusivity.
  • Compulsory Licensing: Compulsory licensing provisions under Eurasian law can affect patent rights if public health considerations arise.

Conclusion

EA201590617 embodies a strategic approach vital for pharmaceutical innovators seeking regional protection within Eurasia. Its scope depends on the draft claims' breadth—balancing broad exclusivity with legal robustness. The patent landscape illustrates a competitive environment emphasizing innovation, territorial coverage, and strategic claim drafting to maximize market rights and minimize invalidation risks.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope hinges on claim drafting, balancing broad protection with defensibility.
  • Pharmaceutical patents in Eurasia focus heavily on chemical structure, production methods, and therapeutic use.
  • EA201590617 is situated within a dynamic landscape characterized by increasing R&D, regional patent filings, and stringent examination standards.
  • Strategic patent management, including territorial coverage and claim specificity, is critical for maintaining competitive advantage.
  • Vigilance regarding prior art, potential legal challenges, and market dynamics influences the patent’s value and longevity.

FAQs

1. How does patent protection under the Eurasian Patent Organization differ from other jurisdictions like Europe or the US?
EAPO grants regional protection across member states based on a single application and examination process, contrasting with the jurisdiction-specific filings required by the EU or US. Patent terms are generally 20 years from the filing date, with no extensions commonly available.

2. Can a pharmaceutical patent filed in Eurasia be invalidated or challenged?
Yes. Like other jurisdictions, Eurasian patents can be challenged for lack of novelty, inventive step, or industrial applicability. Overbroad claims or prior art disclosures can lead to invalidation.

3. What is the significance of claim drafting in the patent’s enforceability?
Claims define the legal scope of protection. Well-drafted, specific claims enhance enforceability, while overly broad claims risk invalidation and weaken enforceability.

4. How long does patent protection last for pharmaceutical inventions in Eurasia?
The typical patent term is 20 years from the filing date. Regulatory delays do not usually extend this period.

5. What strategic considerations should companies pursue regarding Eurasian patents?
Companies should aim for comprehensive territorial coverage, draft claims to balance breadth and validity, monitor evolving patent landscapes, and consider parallel filings in other jurisdictions to extend protection.


Sources:

  1. Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO) Official Website, "Patent Law and Practice," 2023.
  2. WIPO Guide on Patent Drafting and Examination, 2022.
  3. Eurasian Patent Convention (EPC), 1994.
  4. Industry Reports on Patent Filings and Trends in Eurasia, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.