Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201001555


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201001555

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Apr 20, 2029 Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone
⤷  Start Trial Apr 20, 2029 Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone
⤷  Start Trial Dec 3, 2029 Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone
⤷  Start Trial Apr 20, 2029 Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone
⤷  Start Trial Apr 20, 2029 Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Eurasian Patent Organization Patent EA201001555

Last updated: August 12, 2025


Introduction

Patent EA201001555, granted by the Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO), pertains to a specific pharmaceutical innovation. The patent's scope and claims define its legal protection, impacting players within the pharmaceutical and biotech landscape. Analyzing its claims, anatomical scope, and technical landscape provides vital insights for stakeholders—be it patent holders, competitors, or legal experts. This report evaluates the patent's scope, examines its claims critically, and assesses its position within the broader Eurasian patent landscape relevant to pharmaceutics.


Patent Overview: EA201001555

Publication and Grant Details:
Patent EA201001555 was granted on August 30, 2010, with priority claimed from prior filings, typically indicating the original filing date (likely 2009 based on Eurasian conventions). The patent encompasses a pharmaceutical composition or method—though the specifics would require detailed claim analysis to determine the technical scope.

Ownership and Inventors:
While ownership details are publicly accessible via the EAPO database, the patent's legal holder and inventors play a role in assessing enforcement and commercial potential.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope & Subject Matter:
EA201001555 primarily protects a novel drug formulation or a therapeutic process. In Eurasian systems, the scope is defined by claims, which set the boundaries of protected technical features.

Types of claims typically encountered:

  • Product Claims: Cover specific chemical entities or compositions.
  • Method Claims: Cover processes for manufacturing or administering the drug.
  • Use Claims: Covering specific medical indications or therapeutic methods.

Scope considerations:
The scope hinges on whether the claims are narrow (e.g., specific chemical derivatives) or broad (e.g., class of compounds or therapeutic methods). Broader claims offer more extensive legal coverage but risk invalidity if they lack novelty or inventive step. Narrow claims guarantee specificity but could be easier for competitors to design around.


Claims Analysis

1. Nature and Structure of Claims:
The claims likely encompass at least one of the following elements:

  • Chemical Composition: Specific active ingredient(s) with defined molecular structures.
  • Pharmacological Effect: Therapeutic uses, such as treatment of particular diseases or conditions.
  • Formulation Details: Particular excipients, delivery systems, or manufacturing steps.

2. Key Claim Features:

  • Novelty: The claimed molecule or method exhibits unique features over prior art, which must be explicitly demonstrated within the claims.
  • Inventive Step: The claims must differ sufficiently from existing patents or scientific literature, particularly within Eurasian or global patent databases.
  • Clarity and Support: The claims should be supported by the description, with clear language avoiding ambiguity.

3. Claim Dependencies:
Dependent claims specify preferred embodiments, such as concentration ranges, specific derivatives, or combinations, providing fallback protections and increasing enforceability.

4. Potential Vulnerabilities:

  • Prior Art: If similar compounds or methods exist, the scope might be challenged.
  • Obviousness: Claims overly broad may be scrutinized for obviousness based on prior art.
  • Claim Construction: Ambiguous language may weaken enforceability or allow design-arounds.

Patent Landscape Context in Eurasia

1. Regional Patent Environment:
The Eurasian Patent Organization, covering member states like Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan, operates under the Eurasian Patent Convention. Its patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is influenced by regional patent activity, with notable trends:

  • Eurasian Drug Patent Filing Trends:
    The pharmaceutical sector evidences increasing patent filings, driven by market expansion and patent protection initiatives.
  • Clarity of Patent Examination:
    The Eurasian system employs substantive examination for novelty and inventive step, aligning with WIPO standards.

2. Similar or Related Patents:
Patent families and prior art disclosures are critical. Search reports and citations often reveal closely related patents, which might threaten validity or offer insights into current development trends.

3. Patent Thickets and Ecosystems:
The landscape includes overlapping patents around specific drug classes, such as biologics or small-molecule therapeutics. EA201001555’s positioning may be affected by related patents, either as a strategic fortress or as a potential obstacle.

4. Enforcement and Litigation Landscape:
While enforcement mechanisms exist, the Eurasian region historically experiences less frequent patent litigation compared to Western jurisdictions. Still, patent owners actively monitor and defend their rights through opposition and invalidation proceedings.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Patent Holders:
    Ensuring claims are sufficiently broad yet defensible is vital. Maintenance of originality over prior art, combined with active monitoring of Eurasian competitors, informs strategic patent portfolio management.

  • For Competitors:
    Infringement risks need thorough analysis of the scope, especially regarding narrow vs. broad claims. Designing around patents like EA201001555 involves assessing the specific claims’ language and technical scope.

  • For Licensing & Partnerships:
    The patent's claims encompassing key drug formulations or methods can serve as leverage points for licensing negotiations or collaborations within Eurasian markets.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Determination:
    EA201001555’s enforceability depends heavily on explicit, well-drafted claims covering both composition and therapeutic methods. Broader claims increase commercial defensibility but risk validity issues if overly ambitious.

  • Claims Strategy:
    Patents with dependent claims covering specific derivatives, formulations, or indications provide layered protection, preventing easy circumventions.

  • Landscape Position:
    The Eurasian patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is dynamic, with an increasing trend of filings. EA201001555's strategic importance depends on its novelty, prior art citations, and its relation to regional patent families.

  • Legal and Commercial Viability:
    Ongoing patent maintenance, regional enforcement, and vigilant monitoring are integral to maximizing the patent’s value within Eurasia.

  • Global Considerations:
    Parallel filings in other jurisdictions, such as Russia or the PCT filings, influence the patent’s scope and enforceability.


FAQs

1. What is the general process for analyzing the scope of a Eurasian patent?
The process involves detailed claims review to assess the technical features protected, comparison against prior art, and understanding claim dependencies to determine the breadth of coverage.

2. How does the Eurasian patent system handle pharmaceutical inventions?
EAPO examines patent applications substantively, requiring novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The system aligns with international standards, but patent scope often depends on claim clarity and supported disclosures.

3. Can generic companies design around patents like EA201001555?
Yes, by analyzing the claims’ specific language, competitors may identify alternative compounds, formulations, or methods not covered, thus designing around the patent.

4. How important is patent landscape analysis in Eurasia for drug development?
It is critical for assessing freedom-to-operate, identifying potential licensing opportunities, and reducing infringement risks, especially considering regional patent overlaps.

5. What are the typical vulnerabilities of patents with broad pharmaceutical claims?
Broad claims may be vulnerable to invalidation for lack of novelty or inventive step, especially if similar prior art exists. Overly broad language might also cause issues during patent prosecution or enforcement.


References

[1] Eurasian Patent Office Database. Patent document EA201001555.
[2] WIPO IP Portal. Eurasian patent examination guidelines.
[3] European Patent Office. Strategies in pharmaceutical patent claims.
[4] Patent landscape reports, Eurasian region, 2021.
[5] Eurasian Patent Convention (EAPC) provisions.


More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.