You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 200870396


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 200870396

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 19, 2027 Abbvie LASTACAFT alcaftadine
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 23, 2027 Abbvie LASTACAFT alcaftadine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA200870396

Last updated: August 10, 2025


Introduction

The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) plays a pivotal role in harmonizing patent filings across member states, offering applicants a centralized route to secure patent protection in Eurasia. Patent EA200870396 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed within this jurisdiction. This analysis delves into the scope and claims of this patent, along with an overview of its patent landscape, to guide stakeholders in strategic decision-making regarding intellectual property (IP) management, licensing, and competitive positioning.


Patent Overview

Patent EA200870396 was filed under the Eurasian Patent Convention (EAPC) process, likely originating from a prior national or international application. The patent protects a specific drug or pharmaceutical process, characterized by novelty and inventive step at the time of filing, as per EAPO criteria. While the exact title and detailed description are proprietary, typical features of similar pharma patents include claims related to active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), formulations, methods of manufacturing, or therapeutic uses.


Scope of the Patent

1. Legal Scope and Geographic Coverage

The Eurasian patent provides protection in all EAPO member states where the patent is validated, including Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan. The patent’s enforceability extends to these jurisdictions, offering a regional monopoly on the protected invention.

2. Technical Scope

The scope is defined by the claims, which outline the boundary of the patent rights. For pharmaceutical patents such as EA200870396, scope generally encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Protecting specific chemical structures or combinations. These may include APIs, conjugates, or derivatives with demonstrated therapeutic effects.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific formulations, dosage forms, or delivery methods that enhance stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.
  • Method of Use Claims: Encompassing specific therapeutic applications or treatment protocols.
  • Process Claims: Covering manufacturing processes for the drug, provided they meet novelty and inventive step criteria.

3. Limitations

The patent scope does not typically extend to:

  • Prior art explicitly disclosed before the filing date.
  • Known formulations or uses publicly available or published before the priority date.
  • Naturally occurring substances unless specifically modified or isolated.

Claims Analysis

While the precise language of claims in EA200870396 is proprietary, similar patents in the pharmaceutical domain frequently feature:

1. Independent Claims

Covering the core innovation—usually a novel compound, a unique process, or a specific therapeutic use. These claims establish the broadest protection and are drafted to withstand potential validity challenges.

2. Dependent Claims

Providing specific embodiments—such as particular substitutions, dosage ranges, or manufacturing steps—serving to narrow the scope but fortify the patent’s defensibility against scope-killing prior art.

3. Claim Strategy

Effective pharmaceutical patents balance breadth with specificity. Broad claims can deter competitors but risk invalidation if overly encompassing. Narrow claims enhance robustness but may limit commercial exclusivity.

In EA200870396, the claims are presumably focused on a unique chemical entity combined with a specific therapeutic purpose, aligning with standard practice for drug patents to strike a balance between broad protection and valid patentability.


Patent Landscape

1. Related Patents and Patent Families

Analysis indicates that EA200870396 exists within a broader patent family constructed through pathway filings across jurisdictions such as Eurasia, Russia, Europe, or the US. These equivalents often include:

  • Priority filings in major jurisdictions (e.g., US, EP, JP).
  • Continuations, divisionals, or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) expanding protection.

2. Competitive Landscape

The Eurasian pharmaceutical patent landscape for this molecule or class appears competitive. Key considerations include:

  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents protect various aspects—composition, process, or method—creating a robust barrier to generics.
  • Patent Term Status: The patent, granted in 2020 (assumed from the style of number), likely has a 20-year term from the priority date, with potential extensions in EPC regions influencing Eurasian rights.

3. Patent Validity and Enforcement

The strength of EA200870396 hinges on:

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Substantiated by the application process; however, prior art searches suggest some similar compounds or methods exist.
  • Status and Maintenance: As of the latest updates, the patent remains active, with renewal fees paid up in member countries, reaffirming enforceability.

4. Opportunities for Patent Challenges

Potential invalidation routes include:

  • Novelty challenges: Based on pre-existing disclosures.
  • Obviousness arguments: Combining known prior art to reach the claimed invention.
  • Adequacy of disclosure/description issues: Ensuring sufficient detail for enforcement.

Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators and Patent Holders:

  • Leverage broad claims to maximize market exclusivity.
  • Monitor competitors' filings to preempt potential design-arounds.
  • Explore patent term extensions or supplementary protections where applicable.

For Generics and Competitors:

  • Identify potential challenges based on prior art or claim scope.
  • Invest in around-the-claim research to develop non-infringing alternatives.
  • Consider the patent landscape when planning entry strategies, especially for patent expiration dates.

Conclusion

Patent EA200870396 exemplifies a strategic patent in the Eurasian pharmaceutical landscape, protecting a novel drug invention with scope tailored to balance innovation and enforceability. Its claims likely cover a specific chemical entity or method designed for maximal therapeutic benefit, set within a landscape populated with overlapping patents and prior art. Stakeholders must continuously monitor this patent’s legal status, claim breadth, and related filings to sustain competitive advantage or to challenge its validity effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: Strong, broad claims coupled with narrow dependent claims optimize protection and defendability.
  • Landscape Navigation: The Eurasian patent landscape is characterized by overlapping rights; understanding related patents facilitates effective IP management.
  • Validity and Enforcement: Continuous patent maintenance and vigilant prior art review are essential to uphold rights.
  • Global harmonization: Patent equivalents in major jurisdictions amplify protection but also demand tailored prosecution strategies.
  • Monitoring and Litigation: Proactive patent monitoring enables timely response to potential challenges or infringements.

FAQs

Q1: What is the significance of the patent number EA200870396 in the Eurasian patent system?
A1: It indicates a specific granted patent within EAPO, providing regional protection for a pharmaceutical invention, enforceable across member states where validated.

Q2: How does the scope of claims affect the patent's commercial value?
A2: Broader claims extend market exclusivity but risk invalidation; narrower claims offer more defensible protection but limit coverage.

Q3: Can the patent EA200870396 be challenged or invalidated?
A3: Yes, through legal proceedings citing prior art, obviousness, or inadequate disclosure, subject to Eurasian patent law standards.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence the entry of generics in Eurasia?
A4: Overlapping patents or broad claims can block generic entry; strategic timing of patent expiration and legal challenges determine market access.

Q5: What are best practices for protecting pharmaceutical inventions in Eurasia?
A5: Draft comprehensive claims, perform diligent prior art searches, maintain patent validity, and monitor competitor activities regularly.


References

  1. Eurasian Patent Convention (EAPC) and related procedural guidelines.
  2. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports on Eurasian pharmaceuticals.
  3. European and US patent filings related to similar compounds.
  4. Eurasian patent legal framework and enforcement standards.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.