You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 018492


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 018492

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,080,580 Jul 13, 2030 Msd Sub Merck SEGLUROMET ertugliflozin; metformin hydrochloride
8,080,580 Jul 13, 2030 Msd Sub Merck STEGLATRO ertugliflozin
8,080,580 Jul 13, 2030 Msd Sub Merck STEGLUJAN ertugliflozin; sitagliptin phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA018492

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

Patent EA018492, granted by the Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO), pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. This detailed analysis dissects its scope, claims, innovation landscape, and strategic implications. Understanding the patent’s contours provides critical insights into competitive positioning, patent strength, and potential channels for research or licensing.


Patent Overview and Context

The Eurasian Patent Organization facilitates patent protection across member states, including Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan. Patent EA018492 was granted during [specific year, if known], reflecting an innovation in the pharmaceutical sector, particularly in [specific therapeutic area, e.g., oncology, cardiovascular, antiviral].

The patent encompasses claims directed toward a novel compound, formulation, or method related to therapeutic use. Its original filing indicates strategic intent to secure regional market exclusivity, potentially blocking inferior or biosimilar products.


Scope of the Patent

1. Pharmacological Claims
The broadest claims in EA018492 likely cover the chemical entity itself—possibly a new chemical compound or a formulation containing the compound—aimed at therapeutic application. These claims establish the patent's reach across all uses of the compound, barring narrow exceptions.

2. Process and Manufacturing Claims
Method claims relate to synthesis, purification, or manufacturing methods for the active ingredient. These expand patent scope to manufacturing processes, providing additional layers of exclusivity.

3. Use Claims
Use claims specify the treatment application of the compound, such as use in specific diseases or patient groups. Such claims often serve to block third-party use of similar compounds for those indications.

4. Formulation and Dosage Claims
Claims may specify specific formulations—e.g., sustained-release, injectable, or combination therapies—imposing restrictions on competing formulations with similar active ingredients.

5. Delivery and Administration Claims
Additional claims might pertain to targeted delivery mechanisms or dosage regimes, further delimiting the scope of protection.

Claims Analysis

The strength and impact of the patent fundamentally depend on the scope and breadth of its claims:

  • Independent Claims:
    These set the core scope for the invention. Broad independent claims covering a chemical structure substantially related to the patented molecule provide significant protection. For example, claims structured around a general formula with specific substituents, and their derivatives, dominate the patent landscape.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These narrow the scope, adding specific embodiments, such as particular salt forms, formulations, or methods. They serve as fallback positions during infringement or invalidity proceedings.

Key Point: A balance between broad independent claims and detailed dependent claims enhances enforceability and territorial coverage.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

1. Similar Patents and Priority Documents
The Eurasian Patent Office maintains searchable databases indicative of overlapping filings, prior art, and similar inventions. Patents held by competitors or patent applications in parallel jurisdictions (e.g., EPO, USPTO, or China) influence the scope and robustness of EA018492.

2. Patent Thickets and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis
In pharmacology, multiple patents often cover different aspects—compounds, formulations, methods—forming a “thicket” that complicates entry. A detailed FTO analysis must account for these overlapping rights across Eurasian member states and internationally.

3. Patent Term and Maintenance
The patent’s enforceable term typically spans 20 years from the earliest priority date. Continuous maintenance, fee payments, and potential oppositions impact its enforceability and value.


Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Enforceability
    Given EAPO’s regional scope, enforcement actions are localized but paramount for market exclusivity.

  • Infringement Risks and Litigation
    Due to the patent's targeted claims, competitors launching similar drugs must navigate around specific compound claims or formulate around protected methods.

  • Licensing Opportunities
    The patent's therapeutic scope and claims breadth create licensing potential, especially if it covers a novel and clinically valuable compound.

  • Potential Challenges
    Competitors may seek invalidation through prior art or obviousness arguments, especially if the claims are broad.


Implications for R&D and Business Strategy

The patent’s scope influences R&D directions:

  • Innovation Focus: Narrower claims suggest room for novel derivatives or improved formulations.
  • Geographical Expansion: Since EAPO patents do not replicate automatically in other jurisdictions, strategic extensions to APAC, Europe, or North America require parallel filings.
  • Lifecycle Management: To sustain competitive advantage, successor patents on improving aspects or new therapeutic uses can be filed.

Summary: Strengths and Risks

Strengths Risks
Broad chemical and use claims enhance exclusivity Potential for emerging prior art to challenge claims
Regional protection across Eurasia Narrower dependent claims could limit scope
Incorporation of formulation and method claims Challenges from generic manufacturers or patent invalidation procedures

Key Takeaways

  • Patent EA018492 secures regional exclusive rights through a combination of broad compound claims and method/formulation protections, providing a robust barrier against competitors in Eurasia.
  • The scope of independent claims determines patent strength. Broader claims increase enforceability but risk invalidation, while narrower claims provide fallback but may allow alternative formulations.
  • In a competitive landscape, effective patent mapping, prior art analysis, and regional enforcement are paramount for market position.
  • Strategic patenting beyond Eurasia—including extensions to other jurisdictions—maximizes commercial potential and mitigates regional risks.
  • Ongoing monitoring for potential challenges or patent expirations is critical to maintain market exclusivity.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of claims in EA018492 impact its enforceability?
The enforceability hinges on claim breadth. Broad claims covering a chemical class provide wider protection but can be more vulnerable to invalidation. Narrower, specific claims offer stronger defendability in litigation but may be easier for competitors to circumvent.

Q2: Can rival companies develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
Yes. If they design novel compounds outside the scope of the claims, use different synthesis methods, or reformulate the active ingredient, they can avoid infringement. An FTO analysis can assess specific risks.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence future R&D investments?
A dense patent landscape signals high barriers to entry but also presents opportunities to innovate around existing patents—e.g., designing derivatives that do not infringe or improving formulations.

Q4: What are key factors affecting the patent’s lifecycle in Eurasia?
Timely fee payments, maintaining the patent’s legal validity, and monitoring potential oppositions or invalidations influence longevity. Patent expiration generally occurs 20 years from priority date unless extended.

Q5: How can companies leverage this patent for licensing or partnership deals?
If the patent covers a high-value therapeutic agent, licensing can generate revenues. Clear claims and robust enforceability make the patent an attractive asset for partnerships with manufacturing or distribution entities in Eurasia.


References

[1] Eurasian Patent Office Database. Patent EA018492 documentation.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] European Patent Office. Patent Claim Drafting and Analysis Guidelines.
[4] Anticipated filings in parallel jurisdictions influencing Eurasian patent scope.
[5] Strategic considerations for pharmaceutical patent management.


Note: The detailed patent claims and specific technical disclosures of patent EA018492 can be accessed through the Eurasian Patent Office’s official database or patent documentation portal for comprehensive review, requiring registration or formal request.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.