You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 017595


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 017595

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,679,533 Sep 8, 2029 Boehringer Ingelheim MIRAPEX ER pramipexole dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA017595

Last updated: August 21, 2025

Introduction

The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) administers patent protection across member states, facilitating patent filings that cover multiple jurisdictions within Eurasia. Patent EA017595 pertains to a pharmaceutical compound or formulation, protected under the Eurasian patent system. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, assisting stakeholders in strategic decision-making concerning intellectual property rights (IPR) management, licensing, and market entry.


1. Patent Overview and Context

EA017595 was filed under the Eurasian Patent Office and granted based on an application that typically follows formal examination procedures considering novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability (similar to the European or US patent standards). The patent appears to safeguard a specific drug compound, formulation, or method of use, potentially in the treatment of a particular disease or condition, although precise claim details are essential for a full understanding.

2. Scope of the Patent

The scope of patent EA017595 is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of patent protection. Generally, for pharmaceutical patents, the scope encompasses:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the chemical structure of a novel drug candidate.
  • Formulation Claims: Protecting specific pharmaceutical compositions, including excipients and delivery mechanisms.
  • Method Claims: Covering methods of manufacturing or methods of treatment using the compound.
  • Use Claims: Covering specific therapeutic applications or indications.

In this case, EA017595's claims likely focus on a specific chemical entity or a class of compounds with particular substitutions or configurations conferring desired biological activity. The claims might extend to pharmaceutical formulations that include the compound and methods of administration.

Notably, Eurasian patent law tends to favor broad claims where justified by the invention's novelty and inventive step, potentially covering a wide range of chemical derivatives or treatment methods.


3. Detailed Claim Analysis

a. Independent Claims

  • Core Compound Claim: The central claim probably asserts exclusive rights over a specific chemical structure, with variable substituents represented in Markush format, allowing coverage over derivatives.

  • Formulation and Composition Claims: These might specify dosage forms such as tablets, capsules, injections, or topical preparations. Broad claims would encompass all forms containing the core compound within certain concentration ranges.

  • Method of Use Claims: Possibly claim a method of treating a disease (e.g., a certain type of cancer, infectious disease, or neurological disorder) with the compound.

b. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope to specific embodiments—such as particular substituents, delivery systems, or dosing regimens—enabling strategic fallback positions in patent infringement or validity disputes.

c. Strategic Considerations

The robustness of these claims depends on their breadth and the prior art landscape. Broad claims covering chemical class without narrow limitations may be vulnerable to validity challenges but offer broader protection. Narrow claims reduce validity risk but limit scope.


4. Patent Landscape Analysis

a. Global Patent Environment

The patent landscape for drugs similar to EA017595 is complex, often involving multiple jurisdictions including Europe, the US, China, and others. Key points include:

  • Prior Art: The patent's novelty hinges on a prior art search revealing no identical or obvious derivatives, especially considering international patents such as those under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  • Similar Patents: Several patents may exist claiming related chemical structures or therapeutic methods, resulting in a "patent thicket" complicating freedom to operate.

b. Eurasian Specifics

  • The Eurasian patent system maintains its own unique set of prior art references and legal standards, sometimes stricter or more lenient compared to the European Patent Office (EPO).

  • The patent EA017595's approval indicates the applicant successfully defended against novelty or inventive step objections, possibly through data or claim amendments.

c. Litigation and Licensing Landscape

  • There appears to be limited litigation within the Eurasian region regarding this patent, possibly due to it being relatively recent or niche.

  • Licensing or partnerships may be ongoing, especially if the patent covers a promising compound or novel therapeutic approach.


5. Risks and Opportunities

Risks:

  • Patent Invalidity: Potential prior art or obviousness challenges could threaten the patent’s enforceability.
  • Narrow Claim Scope: If claims are too narrow, competitors might develop similar compounds outside the scope, reducing exclusivity.
  • Limited Jurisdictions: Eurasian protection covers specific countries; global patent strategies require parallel filings in key markets.

Opportunities:

  • Market Exclusivity: Valid patent rights block generic competition in Eurasia, enabling premium pricing.
  • Technology Licensing: The patent can generate revenue through licensing agreements or partnerships.
  • Patent Life Cycle Management: Future patent filings (such as secondary or divisional applications) can extend coverage.

6. Strategic Recommendations

  • Conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses considering existing patents in all target jurisdictions.
  • Explore supplementary protecion via data exclusivity rights, especially in markets with strong regulatory data protection.
  • Monitor patent expiry timelines to plan for generics or biosimilar development.
  • Evaluate opportunities for joint ventures or licensing, capitalizing on the patent’s protected compounds or methods.

7. Regulatory and Market Implications

Patent EA017595 enhances the commercial value of the associated drug candidate by establishing enforceable rights within Eurasia, a growing pharmaceutical market. Its scope influences regulatory strategies, manufacturing options, and competitive positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent EA017595’s scope hinges on its claims, likely covering specific chemical compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods. The breadth of these claims determines its strength and vulnerability.
  • Patent landscape studies identify potential patent overlaps, guiding risk mitigation and strategic planning. A thorough prior art search enhances positioning.
  • Protecting innovations through Eurasian patents offers regional exclusivity but must be complemented by global IP strategies for comprehensive coverage.
  • Valid, broad claims coupled with strong prosecution and enforcement plans maximize commercial value.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent validity, expiry dates, and related patent filings is critical for maintaining market advantage.

FAQs

Q1: How does Eurasian patent EA017595 differ from similar patents in other jurisdictions?
A1: EA017595’s claims are tailored to Eurasian patent standards, which may differ in claim breadth and examination rigor. Its legal scope encompasses specific compounds or methods validated under Eurasian law, which may be narrower or broader compared to US or European patents, depending on local prior art and prosecution history.

Q2: Can companies challenge the validity of EA017595?
A2: Yes. Third parties can file opposition or invalidity proceedings within the Eurasian Patent Office, citing prior art or obviousness to challenge the patent’s validity.

Q3: What strategies can extend the commercial lifespan of the patent?
A3: Filing divisional or continuation applications, pursuing patent term extensions where applicable, and developing new formulations or methods can prolong exclusivity.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence future drug development?
A4: A dense patent landscape may restrict freedom to operate, prompting innovation in alternative compounds or approaches. Conversely, a clear patent scaffold encourages investment and partnership opportunities.

Q5: Is Eurasian patent protection sufficient for global marketing?
A5: No. Eurasian protection is regional. To secure global rights, companies must file corresponding patents in key markets like the US, EU, China, and others.


References

  1. Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO) official documentation and patent database records.
  2. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports, 2022.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO) guidelines on patent drafting and claims analysis.
  4. Patent analytica reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies in Eurasia.
  5. International Patent Classification (IPC) related to pharmaceuticals.

End of Document

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.