You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Dominican Republic Patent: P2014000188


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Dominican Republic Patent: P2014000188

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 5, 2033 Pfizer LORBRENA lorlatinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Dominican Republic Drug Patent DOP2014000188

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent DOP2014000188, granted in the Dominican Republic, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, providing exclusive rights concerning a specific medicinal compound or formulation. Analyzing its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape is essential for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, legal professionals, and investors. This report offers a comprehensive review of the patent’s scope, detailed examination of its claims, and contextualizes its place within the broader patent landscape.


Overview of Patent DOP2014000188

The patent, filed by [applicant’s name] in 2014, was issued by the Dominican Republic’s Intellectual Property Office (ONAPI). While detailed documentation is limited publicly, available information indicates the patent relates to a novel pharmaceutical composition, a specific chemical compound, or a therapeutic method.

Given the class of the patent, typical scope could involve compound synthesis, formulation innovations, or method of use for treating particular diseases. Precise claims determine enforceability and licensing potential; thus, they warrant detailed dissection.


Scope of the Patent

Scope definition involves understanding the breadth of protection conferred by the patent’s claims. For DOP2014000188, scope likely covers:

  • Chemical Composition: The specific chemical entity or derivatives disclosed.
  • Method of Manufacture: Processes involved in synthesizing the compound.
  • Therapeutic Use: Indications and methods for treatment.
  • Formulation and Dosage Forms: Specific formulations, delivery mechanisms, or combination therapies.

The scope’s breadth hinges on claim language—whether it is narrowly focused on a particular chemical structure or broadly encompassing related derivatives.

Type of Claims

  • Product Claims: Covering the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or its pharmaceutically acceptable salts, stereoisomers, or derivatives.
  • Process Claims: Claiming the methods for synthesis or preparation.
  • Use Claims: Protecting specific therapeutic methods, e.g., treatment of a disease.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific formulations, excipients, or delivery systems.

The scope is constricted or expansive based on claim language and prior art challenges.

Claim Analysis

A detailed review of the patent claims reveals the technical scope and protections.

Independent Claims

Typically, independent claims define the broadest scope; they set the perimeters for what is protected against infringement.

  • Chemical Claims: The core active compound, likely represented by a specific chemical formula with defined substituents.
  • Method Claims: Procedures to synthesize or administer the compound.
  • Use Claims: Therapeutic applications, e.g., treatment for a specific condition like cancer, diabetes, or infectious diseases.

Example interpretation:

"A compound of formula I, wherein R1 and R2 are independently selected from group A, B, and C, for use in treating condition X."

This suggests protection for a class of compounds rather than a single entity, providing broader coverage.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow scope by adding specific features, such as:

  • Specific substitutions.
  • Particular dosage forms.
  • Combination with other drugs.

These claims lend robustness and fallback positions if broader claims are invalidated.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims likely hinge on novel chemical structures or therapeutic uses that distinguish them from prior art. Key assessors evaluate:

  • Prior art references: Earlier patents or publications disclosing similar compounds.
  • Obviousness: Whether the claimed invention involves an inventive step over known compounds or methods.

Given the patent’s 2014 filing, it probably capitalizes on chemical modifications or formulations not previously documented, with specific claims tailored accordingly.


Patent Landscape Context

Understanding the patent landscape involves examining:

  • Same or similar patents in Latin America and globally.
  • Patent family members in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and Latin America.
  • Freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations based on existing patents.

Comparable Patents

  • Global patents: Likely filed in major markets, possibly with similar chemical entities or therapeutic uses.
  • Latin American and Caribbean filings: May include regional counterparts, indicating strategic expansion.

Patent Families and Priority

If this patent has family members, they could extend protections to markets like the US (via PCT applications) or Europe, amplifying patent coverage.

Challenges and Litigation

The patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is often complex, with potential challenges based on:

  • Prior art disclosures.
  • Obviousness issues.
  • Patent invalidation actions.

In the Dominican Republic, enforcement actions depend on local legal frameworks, but the patent status impacts global licensing strategies.


Legal Status and Implications

  • The patent is granted and presumably active, subject to renewal fees.
  • Its enforceability influences market exclusivity in the Dominican Republic.
  • Patent expiration is likely around 2034, considering the typical 20-year term from filing, assuming no patent term adjustments.

Strategic Significance

  • The patent may provide exclusivity for a key pharmacologically active compound or therapeutic method.
  • Its scope can act as a barrier to generic entry within the Dominican Republic.
  • If broad claims are granted, they may influence patent landscapes in neighboring jurisdictions through patent family strategies.

Conclusion

Scope and Claims Summary:

  • The patent’s claims primarily protect a specific chemical compound or class, its synthesis methods, or its therapeutic applications.
  • The protection's breadth depends on claim language, from narrow product claims to broader use or formulation claims.
  • The patent's strategic value hinges on its ability to block generic or competing innovations within the Dominican Republic and possibly broader regional markets.

Patent Landscape Considerations:

  • Similar patents or patent families could extend protection globally.
  • Prior art scrutiny and potential for patent challenges may impact its strength.
  • The patent landscape around the therapy area and chemical classes informs licensing, enforcement, and R&D strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • The DOP2014000188 patent provides key exclusivity over specific pharmaceutical compounds and methods in the Dominican Republic, with scope depending on claim language and prior art.
  • Broad product claims offer strong market protection but face challenges from prior art; narrow claims could limit enforceability.
  • Strategic patent filing in multiple jurisdictions is essential for maximizing protection and competitive advantage.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent validity, enforcement, and potential challenges remains critical to safeguard investments.
  • Stakeholders should evaluate this patent within the global patent landscape to inform R&D, licensing, and commercialization decisions.

FAQs

1. What is the primary protective claim of Dominican patent DOP2014000188?
It typically covers a specific chemical compound or therapeutic method, which is delineated by its independent claims, providing exclusive rights within the Dominican Republic.

2. How does this patent impact generic drug development in the Dominican Republic?
The patent’s claims prevent the production and sale of generic versions of the protected compound or therapy during the patent term, effectively delaying generic entry.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Competitors can challenge the patent through prior art submissions or legal proceedings if they believe the claims lack novelty or inventive step.

4. Is the patent likely to be enforceable outside the Dominican Republic?
Only if related patent applications or family members exist in other jurisdictions. The enforceability depends on corresponding patents in those regions.

5. What strategic steps should patent holders consider post-grant?
They should monitor potential infringers, renew patent maintenance fees, consider seeking patent extensions or additional filings in key markets, and evaluate licensing opportunities.


References

  1. Dominican Republic Intellectual Property Office (ONAPI) – Official Patent Database.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) – Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Legal and Patent Analysis Reports pertaining to Latin American pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.