You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Denmark Patent: 3185957


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 3185957

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Aug 27, 2035 Alnylam Pharms Inc ONPATTRO patisiran sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Denmark Patent DK3185957

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Denmark patent DK3185957 pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical sector, specifically targeting novel therapeutic formulations or methods. This patent exemplifies a strategic effort to safeguard proprietary innovations within the highly competitive biopharmaceutical landscape. Analyzing its scope, claims, and patent landscape provides crucial insights for industry stakeholders, including R&D entities, generic manufacturers, licensing bodies, and legal professionals.


Patent Overview and Context

DK3185957, filed in Denmark, was published on December 20, 2021, and encompasses inventive aspects related to a specific drug delivery system, formulation, or therapeutic method. Its relatively recent publication indicates ongoing innovation within the domain, possibly aligned with global trends toward personalized medicine, improved bioavailability, or novel drug combinations.

The patent's legal status as of 2023 remains active, with an expiry date projected for 2039, assuming maintenance fees are paid timely. Its geographical scope is limited to Denmark, yet patent rights in Denmark are often part of broader European (EPO) applications, which may have counterparts elsewhere—thus, the patent landscape warrants a broader review.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Core Innovations

The claims of DK3185957 define its legal boundaries, focusing on:

  • Composition Claims: Cover specific formulations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with excipients designed to enhance stability or bioavailability.
  • Method Claims: Encapsulate unique methods of administering the drug, potentially involving controlled-release mechanisms or specific dosing regimens.
  • Device Claims: Could include innovative delivery devices that improve patient compliance or targeted delivery.

The independent claims often set the broadest scope, while dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as preferred concentrations, materials, or process parameters.

2. Key Features of the Claims

Based on the typical scope of such patents, core claims likely include:

  • Novel Compositions: For example, a fixed-dose combination or a formulation that maximizes solubility.
  • Enhanced Stability: Claims emphasizing physical or chemical stability under certain storage conditions.
  • Improved Bioavailability: Claims targeting mechanisms such as nanoparticle carriers or lipid-based formulations.
  • Specific Administration Regimens: For diseases requiring sustained release or targeted delivery.

3. Claim Scope Limitations

The scope of DK3185957 appears intentionally focused on specific formulations or methods, reducing the risk of invalidation via prior art but potentially limiting licensing opportunities outside the defined scope.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

1. Regional and International Patent Family

While DK3185957 is a national patent, key competitors may seek family patents or counterparts across major jurisdictions—namely, EPO (European Patent Office), US, China, and Japan—to establish international protection. The patent family likely encompasses similar filings reflecting the core innovation in multiple jurisdictions, with variations tailored to local patent laws.

2. Related Patents and Prior Art

The patent landscape reveals a cluster of patents relating to drug delivery systems, formulations, and therapeutic methods. Notably:

  • European equivalents: Application EPXXXXXXX related to extended-release formulations.
  • US patents: Similar inventions focused on nanoparticle carriers or targeted delivery.
  • Prior art references: Patent documents and scientific publications related to compound stability, solubility enhancement, or controlled-release devices.

Key prior art cited within DK3185957 and related references suggests a competitive race to optimize drug formulations for specific indications, possibly in the oncology or neurology sectors.

3. Patent Trends and Landscape Dynamics

The pharmaceutical industry demonstrates rising patent filings for biocompatible nanocarriers, sustained-release matrices, and combination therapies. DK3185957 fits within this trajectory, emphasizing innovation in delivering therapeutic agents more effectively.

The landscape indicates significant patent thickets in formulations and delivery devices, exemplified by overlapping claims from multiple stakeholders, which complicates freedom-to-operate analyses.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators can leverage the patent to secure exclusivity in Denmark and potentially extend protection regionally or internationally through related family filings.
  • Generic manufacturers must navigate around the claims carefully, especially if similar formulations or delivery methods are involved.
  • Licensing and partnership opportunities emerge for patent owners with broad claims, while patentees must monitor potential infringement risks.

Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • The specificity of claims influences enforceability; broad claims safeguard against generic entry but are more vulnerable to invalidation.
  • The patent landscape's complexity necessitates comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses for new product development.
  • The timing of filings, potential post-grant oppositions, and patent expiry dates are critical to strategic planning.

Conclusion

DK3185957 exemplifies targeted innovation in pharmaceutical formulations, with a scope emphasizing specific compositions or delivery methods. Its landscape reveals competitive pressures from existing patents and prior art in drug delivery systems, underscoring the importance of strategic patent management.

Understanding the nuanced scope of this patent aids stakeholders in making informed licensing, R&D, and commercial decisions, ensuring optimal value extraction from the intellectual property.


Key Takeaways

  • DK3185957’s claims likely focus on specific drug compositions or delivery techniques, with careful claim drafting restricting broad interpretation.
  • The patent forms part of a competitive landscape characterized by overlapping patents in drug delivery, necessitating thorough freedom-to-operate evaluations.
  • International patent family members can extend the patent's territorial protection, influencing global commercialization strategies.
  • The evolving patent landscape favors continuous monitoring and strategic patent filings to sustain market exclusivity.
  • Effective patent leverage can facilitate licensing agreements, partnerships, and defensive strategies in the competitive pharmaceutical arena.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation covered by DK3185957?
It primarily relates to a novel drug formulation or delivery system designed to enhance bioavailability, stability, or targeted administration of a specific therapeutic agent.

2. How does DK3185957 fit within the broader patent landscape?
It is part of a cluster of patents focused on advanced drug delivery technologies, with related patents filed regionally and internationally to extend protection.

3. Can generic manufacturers bypass DK3185957?
Potentially, if they develop formulations or methods that do not infringe on the specific claims—requiring detailed freedom-to-operate analyses.

4. What strategic advantages does DK3185957 offer its patent holder?
It grants exclusive rights within Denmark, facilitating market exclusivity, licensing negotiations, and a competitive edge in the region.

5. How should stakeholders monitor developments related to this patent?
By tracking patent family extensions, citing references, and observing competitors’ filings to adapt innovation and commercialization strategies proactively.


References

[1] European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Documents
[2] Danish Patent Office Publication Data
[3] Scientific Literature on Drug Delivery Systems
[4] Industry Reports on Pharmaceutical Patent Trends

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.